GDT: ONCE MORE UNTO THE BREACH, DEAR FRIENDS, ONCE MORE

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,664
47,315
Yeah, how much can we really blame Necas when Rod kept him on Staal's 3rd line? Even if the Staal line gets a good amount of TOI, it's safe to say Necas didn't have some of the better linemates.

Rod should've put Necas back to the top 6 for this series. It took him too long to change the lines that worked well enough against NJ, and that was a big part of the problem. Even after he changed the lines, Necas was still on the 3rd line.

I would've been okay with Necas being on the 1st line with Aho and Jarvis, especially at home with last line change, if that meant more goals.

For that reason and several others, Waddell and the rest of our front office better have a good offseason.

Enough of not getting over the hump; injuries or not. Past history aside, set this team up for success as much as possible.

You wanted the Necas that has been basically invisible since mid-March to get more ice time?

He had 7 goals in the 31 games since Svech went down. He (and Aho, frankly) were non-factors in two of the three series the team played (Necas against NYI and FLA, Aho against Jersey and FLA).

The earlier than expected exit was due to three factors: Bob was superhuman, our remaining legitimate Top 6 forwards weren’t impactful enough, and (surprise, surprise) our PP stunk.
 

chaz4hockey

Old man but still a PP2 Candidate
Sponsor
Jan 21, 2021
8,398
17,879
Naples, FL
Patches was an exceptionally good offseason pickup and then tragedy struck.

It is not often that teams that finish in the 110s in points acquire a top 6 winger and a top pair dman and give up virtually nothing in return. They were savvy moves that demonstrated an understanding of what the team needed to get better.
Sorry, don’t agree. It looked good on paper but result was dismal.
 

Identity404

I'm not superstitious, but I am a little stitious
Nov 5, 2005
2,898
7,270
Washington DC
Patches was an exceptionally good offseason pickup and then tragedy struck.

It is not often that teams that finish in the 110s in points acquire a top 6 winger and a top pair dman and give up virtually nothing in return. They were savvy moves that demonstrated an understanding of what the team needed to get better.
Pacioretty was cheap because of his injury history. I don't think the Borg should be given any kudos for the potential that Patches remained healthy and produced in the top six. He was a gamble that didn't pay off. Even though he had a bit of a freak injury that kept him out, him being healthy most of the season was also unlikely
 

Sigurd

Slavin, our Lord and Saver (AKA Extra Goalie)
Feb 4, 2018
1,852
5,312
North Carolina
You wanted the Necas that has been basically invisible since mid-March to get more ice time?

He had 7 goals in the 31 games since Svech went down. He (and Aho, frankly) were non-factors in two of the three series the team played (Necas against NYI and FLA, Aho against Jersey and FLA).


The earlier than expected exit was due to three factors: Bob was superhuman, our remaining legitimate Top 6 forwards weren’t impactful enough, and (surprise, surprise) our PP stunk.
You'd have a good point, except Fast and Martinook just had excellent playoff performances this year for us, and they're hardly the only players to have ever stepped up during the playoffs during a low key season, or in Necas's case late in the season, an inconsistent season.

Also, who is to say Necas wouldn't have generated more offense if he was in the top 6 with better linemates than Staal and one of TT (since you brought up Necas struggling late in the regular season; TT seems VERY relevant unless you think he's been good) or Drury (a kid still trying to break into a bigger role with the organization after being in the AHL)?

Back to Martinook and Fast, they were promoted to the 2nd line for a long time, and did well. They were bumped down to the 4th line after having so much success, but Necas stayed on the 3rd line (iirc, TT was promoted to the 2nd line and that's on top of his recent injury)?

Nope, doesn't make sense to keep Necas on the 3rd line; especially since he's one of the small handful of offensively skilled forwards we have/had left after all of our injuries.

*Edit* I think some folks just don't want to blame Rod for anything. I love the guy too, but he doesn't walk on water. We can complain when warranted.
 
Last edited:
Jul 18, 2010
26,720
57,547
Atlanta, GA
Pacioretty was cheap because of his injury history. I don't think the Borg should be given any kudos for the potential that Patches remained healthy and produced in the top six. He was a gamble that didn't pay off. Even though he had a bit of a freak injury that kept him out, him being healthy most of the season was also unlikely

Him being healthy "most" of the season was probably a more likely outcome than him missing the entire season.

Also, Pacioretty was cheap because Vegas needed the cap space. His injury history played a part but was not the main driver. In his prior 3 seasons he'd played 39/82, 48/56, and 71/71 games. His 39 game season was because of broken bones, not the type of "recurring" injury that gets you an "injury prone" reputation. The full season Achilles injury was a fluke that had nothing to do with prior injury history.
 
Last edited:

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
Gms get fired for making apparently “good” on paper but ultimately poor decisions. Calgary’s GM took a lot of heat this season even though he “won” the off season.
GMs get fired for making terrible that were terrible when made and continued to be terrible for a long time. Luckily for us, Gardiner has been on LTIR for 2 seasons. That was the only one close to that criteria. Patches deal looked great on paper. The best part is, it doesn’t hurt us. Nor did any of the others being 1 year deals.

Stas’ deal looked good until he fell off a cliff
Kase was the real iffy one. But it only hurt in terms of 1.5 million real dollars. Not much at all
 

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Feb 23, 2014
27,714
86,665
Patches was an exceptionally good offseason pickup and then tragedy struck.
The Patches injury pronity proneness... was factored into the price we paid for him. The odds for us getting a prime Patches to play for us weren't particularly good. Tying up 10M of cap into him came with a calculated risk that then non-unexpectedly realized.
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
The Patches injury pronity proneness... was factored into the price we paid for him. The odds for us getting a prime Patches to play for us weren't particularly good. Tying up 10M of cap into him came with a calculated risk that then non-unexpectedly realized.
10M?

It was a risk of him playing a more than 50+ games, not a risk of him playing less than 6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lempo and Tryamw

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,331
102,079
He barely played in 50% of the games the previous two seasons before we aquire him. Him playing most of the season was always a gamble.
That's a bit misleading

Regular season:
He played 71/71 3 seasons before (100%)
He played 48/56 2 seasons before (86%)
He played 39/82 1 season before. (48%)

If it was the same injury that caused him to miss time in the prior seasons, then sure, I'd agree with you, but tearing his achilles wasn't related to anything prior to that.

As we've seen with guys like Justin Williams where he had 4 seasons with injuries, guys can get an "injury prone" label and be perfectly healthy the next season.
 

Identity404

I'm not superstitious, but I am a little stitious
Nov 5, 2005
2,898
7,270
Washington DC
That's just not true. Remember the season before last was a 56 game season. His injuries last season were broken bones, not the type of thing that recurs.
That's a bit misleading

Regular season:
He played 71/71 3 seasons before (100%)
He played 48/56 2 seasons before (86%)
He played 39/82 1 season before. (48%)

If it was the same injury that caused him to miss time in the prior seasons, then sure, I'd agree with you, but tearing his achilles wasn't related to anything prior to that.

As we've seen with guys like Justin Williams where he had 4 seasons with injuries, guys can get an "injury prone" label and be perfectly healthy the next season.
My bad, I forgot about the COVID cup.

Even if we don't label him as injury prone (Vegas still chose him as their cap dump, so I assume they must have had some concerns). I still don't see why we should give credit to the Borg for a paper win during the off-season. It had the potential for being a good move, and didn't pan out. It's a wash.
 
  • Love
Reactions: chaz4hockey

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,644
144,079
Bojangles Parking Lot
Postseason is going to depress scoring. Amd when was he getting top minutes this postseason?

He got PP1 time, but I don't think they ever played him on Aho's line at even strength this offseason.

Sure postseason depresses scoring, but not to the tune of 50%.

We have one more year of Necas on a bargain contract. Next summer he’s going to get paid like a 25 year old 28-goal scorer gets paid. We need to be pretty damn careful with that situation, considering he’s one of the only pure-offense players on the team and he doesn’t produce offense in a physical environment.
 
Jul 18, 2010
26,720
57,547
Atlanta, GA
My bad, I forgot about the COVID cup.

Even if we don't label him as injury prone (Vegas still chose him as their cap dump, so I assume they must have had some concerns). I still don't see why we should give credit to the Borg for a paper win during the off-season. It had the potential for being a good move, and didn't pan out. It's a wash.

Because a process-oriented assessment is probably a better indicator of future performance than a results-oriented assessment where we say “Pacioretty got hurt and therefore it wasn’t a smart move and the Borg doesn’t know how to make smart moves.”
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,644
144,079
Bojangles Parking Lot
Yeah if we find a way to come back and win this series it’ll be the greatest comeback in NHL history for sure.

Never give up.

First thing tomorrow morning, we start digging into potential ineligible players on the Panthers roster. Gonna have to dig deep to win the case for a forfeit, but I think this group is special enough to pull it off.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad