Hodgy
Registered User
- Feb 23, 2012
- 4,841
- 5,049
Well no, that is obviously not the case at all. Tyler Toffoli was the teams best player in expected goals since coming over, and is out with injury. While Josh Leivo also played well with Bo, was productive and is a terrific defensive presence on that 2nd line. His injury also affects the roster construction.
You also forgot Brandon Sutter was one of the Canucks best forwards in this series, from 3rd line centre. He was instrumental in this series win.
Antoine Roussel also does well with tough matchups from the bottom 6.
The Canucks played the majority of this series with 4 top 9 forwards out with injury. Benning’s overpaid bottom 6 was instrumental in covering for those injuries and not hurting the team. That depth 16-17 deep turned into a positive storyline for the club.
None of this answers my question. You still have tons of money allocated to bottom six players that couldn’t be counted on for tough matchups. Why wasn’t Sutter or Beagle taking the tough matchups? They were signed to ridiculously poor contracts so that they could shelter the young players, but yet, it is Bo Horvst, a young player, sheltering then. It’s a total failure.
And this isn’t to say that Sutter was bad this series. Clearly he played much better than he has. But still, Green didn’t use him as the shutdown centre.