Confirmed with Link: Oilers Do Not Match Broberg ($4.58M X2) & Holloway ($2.29M x 2) Offer Sheets | Oilers acquire STL 3rd '28 & Paul Fischer for Futures

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

What Would You Do?


  • Total voters
    646
  • Poll closed .

Oilslick941611

Registered User
Jul 4, 2006
16,316
16,884
Ottawa
so now we are back to square one...hoping and praying this thin D corps can hold together for a saviour at the deadline

unreal
People hate Ceci because was playing top 4 minutes and could handle it at 2ish mil, I imagine how pissed people would be at broberg playing bottom pairing minutes and not handling it at 4.6 mil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McTonyBrar

CantHaveTkachev

Jealousy
Nov 30, 2004
51,626
33,454
St. OILbert, AB
As a stop gap until we fill the #4 spot. I'm going to be optimistic and hope that before the playoffs, we have a better defenseman than Cody Ceci in that spot. If we can long term upgrade on the 2RD position, taking the side-step from VD to Emberson or Stecher is fine.
again, that's embarrassing during a Cup window a journeyman D making league min. is vying for a top 4 spot
 
  • Like
Reactions: McTonyBrar

nabob

Big Daddy Kane
Aug 3, 2005
35,306
22,353
HF boards
yes...Stetcher was #8 on the depth chart, now vying for a top 4 spot
He was probably 6. Battling with 6/7/8/9 for that 4th spot before moving Ceci.

Ceci was 7, Vinny was 8. Only difference now is we have a viable replacement for him and cap space to improve. Being mad about that seems odd
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
14,878
15,990
so now we are back to square one...hoping and praying this thin D corps can hold together for a saviour at the deadline

unreal

It's possible, maybe even likely that we're in that exact same position even with Broberg on the roster. Top 4 RSD was still a demand around here when we all thought Borberg would still be on the team.

Only difference is now we don't have the possibility of a $4.5M anchor that we have to work around. Broberg played all of about 3 games that were actually good his entire time here, it's silly to assume that keeping him would have just worked.
 

McBooya42

Let's do this!
Jun 28, 2010
9,153
7,082
Edmonton
so now we are back to square one...hoping and praying this thin D corps can hold together for a saviour at the deadline

unreal
Same as we were before, which is actually some good work done by Stan considering what we just went through. Broberg was not the answer for 2nd pairing RHD, as he sucked at it. We would still be looking at finding a Ceci replacement regardless.
 

Paralyzer

Oilers Win Cup in 2025
Sep 29, 2006
15,953
8,343
Somewhere Up North
Broberg camp's offer was 1 yr at $1.8M, so yeah he would have.

You guys don't have to apologize or make excuses for the team, sometimes idiotic failure is just infact that.

That's what 1 reporter said. They also said there was tons of teams wanting to offer sheet him, but that could also be a lie too. In the end, we don't know what his intentions were, but to pin blame on the team, or anything without concrete evidence, that is being short-sighted. We wouldn't have improved with Broberg here, and if he was to falter, we gambled on a bust (like we have numerous times in the past), and we lose out yet again on another prospect. It's more of an excuse to want to fault the blame on someone than just moving on and saying it is what it is.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,396
13,866
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
again, that's embarrassing during a Cup window a journeyman D making league min. is vying for a top 4 spot
TEMPORARILY. What would have been embarrassing would have been if we matched and Broberg couldn't handle top 4 RD minutes beside Nurse, as he hasn't shown to be any better than that journeyman. At least now, we can upgrade on that position. If we matched and gave that spot to Broberg, we were locked into him there regardless of his performance, with no cap space to do anything else.

You're acting like this is our playoff team. Chill out. This isn't Ken Holland where nothing is going to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilers

oXo Cube

Power Play Merchant
Nov 4, 2008
11,228
11,913
In your closet
The people melting down about the defense being worse are the group that should be lauding this decision the most. By not committing to Broberg here the team how has cap flexibility and tradable assets to address the problem.

The alternative is you play the equally unproven Philip on his off side and if the mostly likely result comes to pass and that doesn't work out the team is just screwed.
 

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
16,362
18,030
Vancouver
The issue is not losing the players. It's that this was a self-induced situation that led them into inflationary market pricing on two young NHL players than exceeded their spent budget and risk threshold. They allegedly walked from a last deadline deal with these players for a retained Buchnevich to get caught with their pants down taking 2nd and 3rd lottery tickets.

Getting off the overpay cycle is a critical need for a team that's tendency and reality to buy high. Failing to see danger and lose cheap value young talent is a massive issue that was avoidable.
Now a hole at 2RD that they'll have to fill going back to the market likely at peak inflationary time of trade deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oilers4life5

Broberg Speed

Registered User
Oct 23, 2020
7,986
5,366
They used the playoffs to boost their value and held out for the OS
Not a lie.

I would still like to know the dates of the Broberg 1.8M ask and the Holloway 1.1-1.2M offer. Were they before or after the playoffs.

Not good losing young NHL talent like this.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad