Teams clearly circumvent the rules all the time.Low key love that waivers idea with the Sharks.
Doubt the league would let us get away with it though, pretty clear attempt to circumvent the cannot trade for a year rule.
This was my question and what I mentioned in my post. Seems to be circumvention, and also collusion. I think the NHL could look at either in intervening and likely would. In the Oilers instance anyway.Low key love that waivers idea with the Sharks.
Doubt the league would let us get away with it though, pretty clear attempt to circumvent the cannot trade for a year rule.
That has never stopped the NHL from inventing a new, retroactive requirement.
I suspect somewhere in their bylaws they have a “member conduct unbecoming to fair play” that allows the commish to step in as he desires.
Teams clearly circumvent the rules all the time.
The league ignored the Rangers waiving Goodrow to send him to the Sharks despite SJ being on his no trade list.Low key love that waivers idea with the Sharks.
Doubt the league would let us get away with it though, pretty clear attempt to circumvent the cannot trade for a year rule.
Guy's a baller. It's part of the reason he's carved out a solid career as a journeyman defenseman. He plays hard and can absorb minutes on poor teams. Pattern has been as those bad teams improve his ice-time reduces and he moves as a deadline depth d on playoffs teams and then repeats the cycle again.Yeah, the bigger issue (double edged sword) for Stecher is he doesn't know when to back down.
He's a great example of don't look at the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog. (sorry for linking those 3 idiots, but they cover the point well)
But this is what makes Stecher unreliable. It's not his on-ice play, it's the fact that at 5'10 and 185lb I have zero hope he'd last 82 games and/or 4 playoff rounds before breaking down and getting injured.
Yup, that's pretty much it. Broberg and Hollywood were left to rot and their development was purposely thrown aside for geriatric vets, and now we are here.Sorry wasn't labeling you on that. Only general comments made over the years on the board.
I credit Coffey for informing the d-change decision to Broberg. But this is a player who built the confidence in himself through the AHL demotion. In height of playoff competition, I highly doubt the Oilers coaching staff are actively working with Black Aces versus focused on the teams on-ice, their own and game planning to beat elite competition.
Ballsy call but Knoblauch and Coffey unlocked a high value performance from a player who did his work to earn it thousands of miles away from their field of view and focus. And I'm someone who loved the Coffey hire from announcement. Credit is Broberg's.
It's now about value and projection by Oilers braintrust. They've painted themselves into a corner financially and through very poor development of their primary, pedigree young assets.
This has been mentioned many times in the thread but there is a huge difference between older players who are already earnings rich and younger players who are not.I wouldn't give Broberg the money, full stop. But when you consider the other stuff that is rumored, such as him not really wanting to be part of the team, as well as the impact on the locker room, I am 110% on board with waving bye bye.
McDrai are apparently about to leave millions on the table, and other vet players took cuts as well (RNH, Henrique as prime examples) and there is going to be some 23 year old kid who hasn't proved anything, and whined last year about his treatment that is gonna get paid $2-2.5 million more than he should be getting paid? That sets a pretty bad precedent in the locker room IMO.
Wish you the best Broberg, hope it works out for you, I really do, but I don't want you on the team anymore.
Stone going on the IR at the same time every year is crazy obvious is well. Same with the Leafs signing old glass Tanev until 2050.Yes but there are levels. This sort of thing would be Kovalchuk contract with New Jersey levels of obvious.
Either way seems like a pretty unrealistic idea in the real world.
I don't think thats the same thing unless a no trade list prohibits waiver entirely.The league ignored the Rangers waiving Goodrow to send him to the Sharks despite SJ being on his no trade list.
One good turn deserves another...weren't posters on here talking about Karma?I'd rather have the 2nd rounder than Kostin. Unless Oilers just want to screw over the Blues.
Agreed on your post. I wouldn't necessarily say hatred but circumstantially this has been a high chaos organization with extreme highs and lows that spun through 3 coaches since Broberg's draft day. Youth was not trusted to pull this team out of the muck with the pressure from all areas, ownership, management, fanbase, to become a legitimate playoff contender. Their badly neglected sub-average defense needed immediate upgrades with proven veterans Keith, Kulak, Ekholm filling up LD spots.Yup, that's pretty much it. Broberg and Hollywood were left to rot and their development was purposely thrown aside for geriatric vets, and now we are here.
And Broberg was doing this on his offside. How would you feel if you are finally given your shot but have to basically start your full-time nhl career on your off side, thus even throwing another wrench in your development and potentially future earnings. I don't blame him for being frustrated. Woody and Holland's hatred for youth brought us here.
These are our two top fwd and D prospects that got the shaft over the last 2 years and it's all our fault.
He has $9M reasons to report. And since the team can't trade him for a year if the deal is matched, he pisses away $4.5M? Not possible.My fear would be if Oilers match and Broberg doesn't report
That’s not the point. It’s a team clearly circumventing a NTC through waivers.I don't think thats the same thing unless a no trade list prohibits waiver entirely.
Nor is there the one year rule that applies specifically to matching offer sheets.
Unless I'm mistaken there is no clause that says you cannot waive a player with a NTC.That’s not the point. It’s a team clearly circumventing a NTC through waivers.
The Oilers would be circumventing a no trade rule through waivers. It’s same same but different.
Woodrow was a president. I know Woody tried to look all important and everything in suits but.....Agreed on your post. I wouldn't necessarily say hatred but circumstantially this has been a high chaos organization with extreme highs and lows that spun through 3 coaches since Broberg's draft day. Youth was not trusted to pull this team out of the muck with the pressure from all areas, ownership, management, fanbase, to become a legitimate playoff contender. Their badly neglected sub-average defense needed immediate upgrades with proven veterans Keith, Kulak, Ekholm filling up LD spots.
Woodrow the AHL development coach gave long leashes to kids but largely acted like a run-of-the mill veteran coach when his job was to win NHL games. Taking over from Tippett one of his first decisions was to send down Skinner despite the shaky goaltending of Smith/Koskinen. It's what NHL coaches tend to do in situations where winning and playoffs are expected and their teams aren't meeting those expectations.
Onboarding a mature phase organization is tough to do, especially for young defensemen, and especially within high chaos situations we've seen in yo yo Edmonton seasons. It's had an exceptionally high cost as this organization has walked itself into a fork on the road defining situation with its two NHL ready pedigree young players.
EDIT: Just to add, Woody's coaching 'genius' was found out as just as this team's talent did for him replacing Tippett, they normalized their on-ice results to expected levels, they did the same and more for Knoblauch and Coffey.
There's real danger in being forced to make decisions on especially Broberg in light of the fog of chaos surround this team.
No worries. Did not see it as labeling. I was just making myself clearer. Fair point its Broberg that is credited. Mentoring was there though under Coffey, and it wasn't under Manson.Sorry wasn't labeling you on that. Only general comments made over the years on the board.
I credit Coffey for informing the d-change decision to Broberg. But this is a player who built the confidence in himself through the AHL demotion. In height of playoff competition, I highly doubt the Oilers coaching staff are actively working with Black Aces versus focused on the teams on-ice, their own and game planning to beat elite competition.
Ballsy call but Knoblauch and Coffey unlocked a high value performance from a player who did his work to earn it thousands of miles away from their field of view and focus. And I'm someone who loved the Coffey hire from announcement. Credit is Broberg's.
It's now about value and projection by Oilers braintrust. They've painted themselves into a corner financially and through very poor development of their primary, pedigree young assets.
Broberg would be getting waived, not tradedUnless I'm mistaken there is no clause that says you cannot waive a player with a NTC.
There is a specific clause that says a matched offersheet player CANNOT be traded at all for one year.
They are different things.
NHL wouldn't allow us to do this anyway so..
not sure either what makes the SJ thing so great. I'm not revenge motivated.
ps this lays out the rules pretty well
Pittsburgh Steelers, Penguins, Pirates News, Live Coverage | DK Pittsburgh Sports
Pittsburgh Steelers, Penguins, Pirates News, Live Coverage | DK Pittsburgh Sportswww.dkpittsburghsports.com
Woodrow was a president. I know Woody tried to look all important and everything in suits but.....
Thanks captain obvious.Broberg would be getting waived, not traded
That's devious as fack. I would rather give san Jose broberg than st Louis. f*** those guys
Interesting idea