How we’d the team producing when McDavid was injured again? I can’t remember
See above.
I'm not even sure why I bothered with your thought experiment given how much of my previous post you ignored and how obvious your lack of attention to the Oilers has been, but here we go.
His injury was Oct 22, so in the eight games until Woody was fired (Nov 12), we were 2-6 and 26th in GF/G at 2.75. Anyone actually paying attention to the team realized that the much larger issue was being 28th in GA/G at 3.88, a number that was 4+ prior to the game we played that day vs the Kraken (which was ranked 31st for GA/G). Along with almost last in PK. Over those eight games the Oilers scored 22 goals and had 31 against. Simultaneously, Connor McDavid played eight games and had 2 points, for a PPG of 0.33.
The next eight games post coaching change, he had PPG of 2.25 and had 18 points in 8 games. I assume it's fair to say he was back at this moment and it was an equal sample to the games he missed while injured. The Oilers shot up to 2nd in GF/G over that period scoring 35 goals (an increase of 13 over the prior period). You can likely infer that the difference 16 points he had (18-2), had a direct impact on the team scoring 13 more goals (35-22). I concede that point. Interestingly enough, despite this massive boost in production, the team still managed to only go 5-3 because GA/G only rose seven spots to 21st at 3.38, which was a decrease of half a goal per game. The team scoring 1.5 more goals per game wasn't making many strides in the standings due to continued defensive/goaltending failures.
Beyond that stretch of games to the present, the team has played 18 games and seen McDavid's PPG normalize down from 2.25 to 1.61. While that has had a nominal impact on the teams GF/G by decreasing it about 0.60 goals per game, putting them 4th instead of 2nd at 3.67 GF/G, the team managed a monumental 15-3 record... Largely due to GA/G per game decrease by 1.2 down to 2.17. This period saw the Oilers go from 21st in GA/G to 3rd...
It confuses me that your rebuttal to being called out for some laughable 'compliment' was, "what was the production while he was injured", when any analysis at all shows the lions share of recent team success has been due to significant improvement on the defensive/goaltending side of the game.
- The team was floundering in every zone of the ice when he was injured. Fair to question his offensive impact.
- The team was still floundering defensively when he was no longer injured and barely breaking even despite huge offensive contributions from him.
- The team settling in post coaching change to move up from 21st to 3rd in GA, from bottom 5 to top 5 in PK, and top 10 in other shot and possession metrics, along with being top 5 in xG%.
Unless the assertion is that McDavid is playing as a top 3 offensive and defensive forward currently, I don't know how you got anywhere near your original take that he is nearly alone in deserving praise for the team going 15-3. You don't even have to look any further than how much Skinner has progressed over the last 18+ games.