Value of: Oilers 2017 unprotected 1st

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Dbrownss

Registered User
Jan 5, 2014
31,359
8,734
Mid range pick this year, worth a #4dman or prospect close to NHL ready with that upside
 

oStealthKiller*

Master Monkey Herder
Jul 2, 2012
1,342
0
Edmonton
So does anyone other then the Toronto fan want to state what they would trade for it? Don't say number 4 dman, pick someone off ur roster you'd trade for it, 1st + something
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,064
100,847
Been hearing this for years.

Not an Oilers fan, but I feel this year (injuries not withstanding) will be different for a few reasons. They've shored up their defense, have good coaching, have good goaltending and McDavid will be on year 2. Of course, injuries could derail it, but in the recent past, they've never been as complete.

Not saying they'll make the playoffs for sure, but I expect them to compete for the playoffs and predict the pick will be in the 12-18 range.

As a Canes fan, I really wouldn't trade for that pick. Not because that pick won't be valuable, but the Canes are already a very young team with lots of young players so not sure it makes a lot of sense to trade a young D or young F for a draft pick in that range.
 

StephenPeat

Registered User
Jul 19, 2015
4,654
1,617
that's what makes this thread intriguing though.

And precisely the reason the pick won't be traded before the season and likely into the second half of the season at the earliest. Edm GM values the pick as Top 5, Opposing GM value it as 10-20. I suspect the former is why Edm hasn't traded the pick in previous seasons, the later is why similar trades won't be entertained from here on out. It's just not a good poker play to bet on good luck and bad circumstance to be infinite. Also any halfway decent player traded for the pick likely dents the realized value, too many variables currently.
 

StephenPeat

Registered User
Jul 19, 2015
4,654
1,617
Most likely 8th-14th. A second pairing RHD, or solid 3C isn't going to vault this team into the playoffs

If Edm wanted to trade the pick today, this is approximately it's value...3D or more likely 4D or 3C. From the Capitals, I wouldn't trade Backstrom or Kuznetsov for that pick ditto Carlson, Alzner, Niskanen.

Now starting from there is the pick still on the table? For say Orlov......Edm fans don't seem to like that idea and that's what it would be worth. This is why Edm will be unsuccessful trading the pick for help now or if they are successful, their fan base will likely not be thrilled with the return.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,407
13,886
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
GM's don't trade for picks this far away often. I do think Chiarelli will shop it come next draft though, might be a good way to get another d-man.

EDIT - might be a deal that happens partway through the season too. If we are in playoff contention, I would bet that the pick moves for a piece that helps us on the blueline.
 
Last edited:

Homesick

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
17,114
3,512
Calgary

McWeber

Mouthbreather
Jul 14, 2015
2,847
787
Lethbridge
At this time of the year its probably less a matter of finding who you can get for the pick and more about who can be had for a 1st. Not many teams are willing to trade away from the roster for futures before a season starts, not exactly sending the right message. Once a team looks to be falling out of the standings then there may actually be a market for a 1st rounder.
 

Homesick

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
17,114
3,512
Calgary
If Edm wanted to trade the pick today, this is approximately it's value...3D or more likely 4D or 3C. From the Capitals, I wouldn't trade Backstrom or Kuznetsov for that pick ditto Carlson, Alzner, Niskanen.

Now starting from there is the pick still on the table? For say Orlov......Edm fans don't seem to like that idea and that's what it would be worth. This is why Edm will be unsuccessful trading the pick for help now or if they are successful, their fan base will likely not be thrilled with the return.
I agree with you that Oiler fans won't agree with that but I do. I know Orlov is a LHD but he plays the right side if I remember correctly.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,407
13,886
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
Not an Oilers fan, but I feel this year (injuries not withstanding) will be different for a few reasons. They've shored up their defense, have good coaching, have good goaltending and McDavid will be on year 2. Of course, injuries could derail it, but in the recent past, they've never been as complete.

Not saying they'll make the playoffs for sure, but I expect them to compete for the playoffs and predict the pick will be in the 12-18 range.

As a Canes fan, I really wouldn't trade for that pick. Not because that pick won't be valuable, but the Canes are already a very young team with lots of young players so not sure it makes a lot of sense to trade a young D or young F for a draft pick in that range.

Too bad. We could really use Slavin. :naughty:
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,407
13,886
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
I agree with you that Oiler fans won't agree with that but I do. I know Orlov is a LHD but he plays the right side if I remember correctly.

My only issue with Orlov is that I think we need more of a puck moving powerplay specialist. I like the player, just not sure if he is the right fit.

That said, if we go with a 4 forward 1st powerplay unit then we may not need a powerplay guy at all. Lucic-McDavid-Eberle up front, Nuge as the distributor on the backend and Sekera as the point shot could work. Sekera didn't work as shooter last year, but I believe that was because we spent most of the year not looking at enough options on the powerplay. Sorry...off topic, ha ha.
 

member 157595

Guest
A guy like Shattenkirk could be had for a top 5-10 pick.

If Shattenkirk was signed long-term he'd probably already be an Oiler.

Don't see the Oilers moving an unprotected 1st for a rental at the moment.
 

StephenPeat

Registered User
Jul 19, 2015
4,654
1,617
If Shattenkirk was signed long-term he'd probably already be an Oiler.

Don't see the Oilers moving an unprotected 1st for a rental at the moment.

Herein lies the rub. If Shattenkirk was signed long-term he'd probably stay a Blue and his value would likely exceed the value the Oilers 1st will have when it's actually used (by the Oilers or whomever they trade it to).
 

Beacon

Embrace the tank
May 28, 2007
13,676
1,454
The Oilers are expected to make the playoffs so their pick won't be that valuable. Lucic+Larsson are better than Hall alone. McDavid and Klefbom should play the full season. Nurse and Reinhardt should mature. Oilers definitely won't be top 10, so protection won't matter. They may not even be top 20.
 

Brock Radunske

안양종합운동장 빙상장
Aug 8, 2012
16,787
4,701
Wow! I did a "Oilers" search and couldn't find anything for this. Although not that surprising since its usually the only thing Oilers fans have to look forward to.

Well documented what the Oilers are looking for but here's a list of their "depth"

Centre: McDavid, Nugent-Hopkins, Draisaitl, Letestu, Lander, Khaira
Left Wing: Lucic, Pouliot, Maroon, Hendricks, Benson, Slepyshev
Right Wing: Eberle, Yakupov, Puljujarvi, Kassian, Caggiula, *Versteeg

Left Defense: Klefbom, Sekera, Davidson, Nurse, Reinhart, Oesterle, Musil, C.Jones
Right Defense: Larsson, Fayne, Bear, Berglund

Goal: Talbot, Gustuvsson, Brossoit

Shatty for the 1st (top 5 protected)
 

Homesick

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
17,114
3,512
Calgary
Shatty for the 1st (top 5 protected)
I would do that. Adding Shattenkirk would make the Oilers a legit playoff contender and thats the price a team would pay for him at the deadline anyways. If he does help this team make the playoffs and skips town then so be it. The experience and boost in confidence by making the playoffs for all the kids would be worth it
 

StephenPeat

Registered User
Jul 19, 2015
4,654
1,617
L.p.
Any player the Oilers trade their pick for will have enough value to drop that pick out of the top 15, or more.

It's fools gold.

Precisely why no team will trade a player good enough to have that kind of impact for the Oilers 1st before having some assurance the Oilers will, in fact, be in the lottery. Every GM is not Toronto-era Brian Burke.
 

A91

Oilers + Real Madrid
May 21, 2011
6,944
2,221
Edmonton
I would do that. Adding Shattenkirk would make the Oilers a legit playoff contender and thats the price a team would pay for him at the deadline anyways. If he does help this team make the playoffs and skips town then so be it. The experience and boost in confidence by making the playoffs for all the kids would be worth it

How about us fans who have waited over a decade for playoff hockey. I do this trade and hope the new arena + McDavid factor + Potential of the team + Money will make him stay.
 

Dbrownss

Registered User
Jan 5, 2014
31,359
8,734
Shatty for the 1st (top 5 protected)

There would be zero protection. Adding Shattenkirk makes the chances of that pick being very valuable slim. If the Oilers can't make the playoffs after adding Shattenkirk....then they just don't deserve anymore top picks lol. A 1st round pick this early in the year just isn't THAT valuable
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad