Rob Brown
Way She Goes
- Dec 17, 2009
- 17,448
- 14,543
They didn’t have bertuzzi domi in the playoffs and knies got hurt .The problem they had in the playoffs was scoring, not D.
You are just making a big problem even worse.
Between bertuzzi domi and knives they will make up for the loss of Willy.you're right, we should trade the guy who just scored 40 goals to keep a kid who might score 40 points
The Leafs ahve been collectively so bad in the playoffs that 88 looks like a palyoff stud, let’s not kid ouselves, he’s no Glenn Anderson……..The problem they had in the playoffs was scoring, not D.
You are just making a big problem even worse.
Yes but can we please find a Claude Lemieux. Just one royal a*****eThe Leafs ahve been collectively so bad in the playoffs that 88 looks like a palyoff stud, let’s not kid ouselves, he’s no Glenn Anderson……..
The problem they had in the playoffs was scoring, not D.
You are just making a big problem even worse.
and now we have Klingberg and Timmins who can do that.A big part of our inability to score came from our blueline’s inability to effectively move the puck up ice.
Tbh, the ideal situation would be getting Zadorov and Tanev from Calgary because I feel like those 2 fill out the D and fit in perfectly, especially for the kind of players Treliving wants back there.and now we have Klingberg and Timmins who can do that.
--------------------------------------------
Patience folks. Teams aren't going to be trading a major D piece at this time of year. There aren't teams with excess D, of the quality you'd trade for Nylander. At this point, we are more likely going to need to wait until teams start falling out of the playoffs, are struggling, or have major injuries and are willing to make moves.
Plus we honestly don't know how our group will perform this season. Give McCabe a full year with the team, Klingberg some time to adjust, maybe Timmins can play a stretch without injury, let's see where Liljegren is at once the rust is off, if Brodie has actually declined, and what Gio has to contribute. Or if some Marlie surprises and becomes a force for us. I've wanted a physical partner for Rielly, a decent top pairing guy, but at this point, we have to wait... and it's prudent. This group is fine for regular season, and we have plenty of time to judge what changes might need to be made, and how we can accomplish that later in the year.
I don't think playing him at wing in one practise (and maybe one game) is a guarantee he would start the season there either.I don't think trying him out in preseason was ever meant to be taken as a guarantee he would start the season there.
Tbh, the ideal situation would be getting Zadorov and Tanev from Calgary because I feel like those 2 fill out the D and fit in perfectly, especially for the kind of players Treliving wants back there.
Rielly-Tanev
McCabe-Klingberg
Zadorov-Liljegren/Timmins
Gio-Timmins/Liljegren
Only issue is making it work cap wise and other then Brodie who else do we involve in that trade? Jarnkrok would have to be involved on our side. Idk how LTIR works or trading guys who are on LTIR but does Murray getting put in the trade help both sides cap wise? Anyways, not gonna happen but just thinking out loud pretty much.
What’s the value on Trocheck+Schneider. In a Nylander trade ?
Cap saving being a solid plus as well
Sounds great in theory, but no team wants to just trade a quality D man. Not one who will impact a game as much as Willy does anyway.With all these kids making it difficult to send them down there’s no better time to flip 88 for a quality D man……..
I read they moved Nylander back to the wing... I do not want JT as a centre anymore lol. Too slow to do the job.
The best argument for trading Nylander is to avoid an "own rental" situation abd lose him for nothing. Which is very likely what we're going to doyou're right, we should trade the guy who just scored 40 goals to keep a kid who might score 40 points
The best argument for trading Nylander is to avoid an "own rental" situation abd lose him for nothing. Which is very likely what we're going to do
Who do you add for an expiring Nylander that makes us better in the playoffs than we are now by keeping Nylander?The best argument for trading Nylander is to avoid an "own rental" situation abd lose him for nothing. Which is very likely what we're going to do
Minten like Holmberg they don't jump of the page but they play the right way.Not sure why everyone is freaking out. Keefe said in his presser that Nylander was moved to the wing at practice to get Minten some more reps in camp.
Minten has had a good camp for sure. Has it been jump off the page? Not really. But he's shown very well. He's likely going to get another exhibition game. I guess there is an outside chance that he gets a 9 game stint but I think it's more likely that they send him back to the WHL on a positive note. Tell him what to specifically work on and have him ina good spot to make the team next year.
If he can play his way onto the Canadian World Junior team this year, that would be a great feat in itself.
Minten people woried that his true potential won't realize by staying . He will be learning from the best JT faceoffs mathews shooting etc.
Some players are better in the NHL, he could be one of them.
Minten like Holmberg they don't jump of the page but they play the right way.
He had 67 points in 57 games in the WHL, I wouldn't say he ideally should be playing in the AHL just yet. Let him take over from Stankoven this year as the #1 option in Kamloops and hopefully play for Canada at the WJC and next year he'll be either ready for a role on the Leafs and if not start with the Marlies.Minten is in an weird spot, ideally he should be playing in AHL
I think he's still another year away from competing for an NHL role.