Yeah but then he wouldn't get his prediction right soo.... Get with the program dis.Also that Collins doesn't need waivers.
He doesn't need waivers but that is irrelevant if we are carrying 3C either way.
It makes sense if we were going 2C, Bird, Lukes, Tapia, Espinal for example.
But even though both Reese McGuire and Zack Collins play catcher, they do so in very different ways. Amusingly, as we at FanGraphs work through our Positional Power Rankings, Collins is essentially positionless power. His home run totals in the minors and batted ball metrics in the majors tell a consistent story; if he can figure out a way to limit his strikeouts, he’ll be a fearsome hitter.
Having all of Jansen, Kirk, and McGuire on the Blue Jays clearly didn’t make sense, particularly with Moreno’s imminent arrival. If you had to choose one of the three as a starter, it would be Jansen, who best combines defense and offense. If you had to choose one as a backup, it would be Kirk; the extra value he provides as a DH is huge, and even at catcher, his combination of good hitting and acceptable defense might make him a better option than McGuire. That leaves McGuire to get jerked around between Triple-A and the majors as needed, except that he was out of options. As soon as the Jays needed roster space, they’d lose him for nothing.
Feel like Katoh having reverse splits in both of his past two seasons makes him a weird option for a lefty bench bat but I guess the positional versality won out?
I still don't love our Centerfield depth and would have liked to see Lukes shore that up but we'll see how it plays out. If Springer gets hurt, all of the sudden we're reliant on Tapia playing everyday despite a below average glove in center and a below average bat that Montoyo is going to play too high in the lineup.
I'm admittedly no expert in defensive analytics, I usually just go off of UZR/150 through fangraphs or dWar through BRef, neither of which look too favourably on Tapia but if there's better metrics out there that like his play, I'll embrace him as a defensive option.Tapia doesn't have much experience in CF, but the numbers there are fantastic (even though they come in under 200 innings, which makes them basically meaningless).
The issue with the lefty bench bat thing is... whether it's Bird, Katoh, Lukes, or Palacios, who is he going to come off the bench for? None of those guys hit righties better than any of the righties in the everyday lineup.
Tapia has played 37 games in CF at at the major league level and only 18 of those games were starts which means that in he other 19 games, he was likely moved in the last two or three innings. So, is this even a big enough sample space for any of these defensive stats to mean anything?I'm admittedly no expert in defensive analytics, I usually just go off of UZR/150 through fangraphs or dWar through BRef, neither of which look too favourably on Tapia but if there's better metrics out there that like his play, I'll embrace him as a defensive option.
You're right that the PH opportunities would probably be limited, I think alot of that it would've depended on how well Espinal/Biggio do this season but that's all secondary to my main argument in favour of Lukes. I think he has a very good chance of having a better season than Tapia and I'd prefer to try him as the 4th OF with Tapia being mostly restricted to PR and defensive substitutions.
We all know that Katoh will start at least once per week because Montoyo. Heck, it wouldn't shock me if he DHs game 3 or 4 of the season.I'm really not a fan of this. If Springer, Gurriel, or Teo is DHing or a day off I want Tapia or Biggio playing. If Chapman, Bo, or Biggio is DHing or day off I want Espinal playing. What use does Katoh have? I sure don't want him playing unless there's injuries. I'm prepared to be angry everytime he gets into the lineup. Seems like that spot would have been better used on an extra pen arm for now.
That's okay. The Jays are saying Katoh plays RF and he's played 7 outs worth in his pro career.Tapia has played 37 games in CF at at the major league level and only 18 of those games were starts which means that in he other 19 games, he was likely moved in the last two or three innings. So, is this even a big enough sample space for any of these defensive stats to mean anything?
.
There will never be a valid reason for Katoh to play ahead of Espinal or pinch hit for Espinal - ever.We all know that Katoh will start at least once per week because Montoyo. Heck, it wouldn't shock me if he DHs game 3 or 4 of the season.
Tapia in CF (in just 189 inning):I'm admittedly no expert in defensive analytics, I usually just go off of UZR/150 through fangraphs or dWar through BRef, neither of which look too favourably on Tapia but if there's better metrics out there that like his play, I'll embrace him as a defensive option.
You're right that the PH opportunities would probably be limited, I think alot of that it would've depended on how well Espinal/Biggio do this season but that's all secondary to my main argument in favour of Lukes. I think he has a very good chance of having a better season than Tapia and I'd prefer to try him as the 4th OF with Tapia being mostly restricted to PR and defensive substitutions.
The only good thing is that he is 27 and has a 10+ BB rate his whole minor league career.There will never be a valid reason for Katoh to play ahead of Espinal or pinch hit for Espinal - ever.
But it's going to happen and will cost W's.