Scion
Registered User
- May 25, 2012
- 2,739
- 1,475
If D'Arnaud is in the deal you have to figure it includes Davis and possibly Niese as well.
Niese doesn't make sense, unless the Jays plan on re-flipping him or someone else in the rotation.
If D'Arnaud is in the deal you have to figure it includes Davis and possibly Niese as well.
Ike Davis sucks.
They both suck and one should go.
Want to repeat 1 thing reported earlier, because important here. 2 people involved in this tell me Dickey will do extension w TOR if traded
eeeew no. If we had to give up D'Arnaud i'd do this:D'Arnaud + Gose + Buck for Dickey + Davis + Thole
Perhaps?
D'Arnaud + Gose + Buck for Dickey + Davis + Thole
Perhaps?
Niese doesn't make sense, unless the Jays plan on re-flipping him or someone else in the rotation.
Wouldn't be surprised if the Jays moved Buehrle either in the trade or another one right after if it happened, and then used the extra money money (about 5.5M) to try to upgrade at 1B this year.
If we are trading d'Arnaud for Dickey, AA is making a huge mistake.
Top 10 prospects provide so much surplus value because of the low salary they are played, if d'Arnaud does go to the Mets we will be regretting it.
We should just stay away from deals with d'Arnaud involved unless we are getting a young and controllable asset similar to him.
If we are trading d'Arnaud for Dickey, AA is making a huge mistake.
Top 10 prospects provide so much surplus value because of the low salary they are played, if d'Arnaud does go to the Mets we will be regretting it.
We should just stay away from deals with d'Arnaud involved unless we are getting a young and controllable asset similar to him.
Andy Martino@MartinoNYDN
Trading D'Arnaud doesn't make sense to me...
Trading D'Arnaud doesn't make sense to me...
Want to repeat 1 thing reported earlier, because important here. 2 people involved in this tell me Dickey will do extension w TOR if traded
which means we would have to give up more
what kind of extension
he would want scary dollars