hes busy doing real life work that apparently sounds like a pretty serious/responsible job.. but he dont know more than ppl on this other forum who watched baseball pre-2015 "lmfao"
Im wondering where djq is for this... probably just igoring
where did I ever say that about him?
Since you have literally provided nothing to this, would you say Stroman lands you Goldschmidt, Turner, Correa etc?
How about you ignore the sarcastic response for once on this?
where did I ever say that about him?
Since you have literally provided nothing to this, would you say Stroman lands you Goldschmidt, Turner, Correa etc?
How about you ignore the sarcastic response for once on this?
...... Seriously?
Yes, he should net you Goldschmidt. The other two should have been on the untouchable list.
Red Sox giving the big **** you to Josh Rutledge
Guy elects free agency from Boston, then signs somewhere else and Boston takes him back
How have I provided nothing to this when I explained to you how FIP changes yr to yr so the avg/above avg titles change, and I also said his WAR, FIP, and xFIP and told u where they were amongst all pitchers. What have YOU provided? anything of importance other than flip flopping your opinion from 3 to 2?
Stroman nets us Goldschmidt? If so, this trade should have been done yesterdayYes, he should net you Goldschmidt. The other two should have been on the untouchable list.
so him being a long time poster on this one site makes me wrong? Gotcha.
HFBoards isn't the only forum on the internet.
Also in no way did I attack him. If he knows baseball, I'd love to talk with him. Just because I didn't agree with his opinion, doesn't make me not know what I'm talking about.
I'm not flip flopping at all. I said he's a number 3, but can accept that people view him as a number 2?
Also answer my question about his value for Correa.
I'd strongly disagree. His contract is a steal and he has been one of the most valuable offensive players since 2012.
what does correa have to do with anything ive said? I never brought him up ...
Career as SP:
Stroman (25): 56gs, 6.3ip/gs, 91era-, 82fip-, 81xfip-, 7.1fwar, 6.6ra9war, 3.9war/32gs
So far, overall, he's been a good #2 SP.
Though at this point he's actually looked more like a #1 for most of the time, with one crazy stretch of awfulness in the middle of this season bringing down his numbers.
MTF is pretty good too
And while you are entitled to disagree, Stroman was higher in WAR relative to other starters than Goldschmidt was to other hitters
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.as...type=8&season=2016&month=0&season1=2016&ind=0
Goldschmidt put up roughly the same numbers as Edwin, while also being a 1B.
Only Dave Stewart wouldn't make that deal (given that Stroman is likely to trend up while Goldschmidt is likely to trend down) if offered Stroman.
Stroman nets us Goldschmidt? If so, this trade should have been done yesterday
Stroman nets us Goldschmidt? If so, this trade should have been done yesterday
So you can accept people view him as a #2 but you feel the need to continuously ***** with everyone all at the same time anyway?
Most of us didn't call him an ace, if you're ok with people calling him a #2(because he is one) then why did this argument occur in the first place.
I also 'ed at the "being a #3 isn't a bad thing", ok then, lets call Clayton Kershaw a #3 and then when people laugh at us just tell them it's not a bad thing. It isn't a bad thing, but it's also nice to be accurate in our judgements, and not fallback on a stat(FIP) that ranks him 21st as a means to argue that he's a #3.
And no before you ***** some more I'm not saying Stroman is Clayton Kershaw it's a damn example. I'm done, looking forward to not reading your next 4 replies.
I think he is assuming that Dbacks management would be under the influence like during the Shelby Miller trade