(This is not a leaf thread, in my example I use a FEW leaf players as I know them best, but also compare other players in the league as well, so please don't flame me as a leaf fan).
Apparently OEL is an elite #1 dman according to this board..
Right now he has 23 points in 48 games on pace for 39 points and a -12 on pace for -20.
So a 39 point, -20 dman is elite?
Just for comparison..
Cody Franson has 25 points in 48 and is -6, on pace for just over 40 points and a better +/- and an equally terrible team.
Justin Faulk has 28 in 47 on pace for 48 points and a much better +/- on a worse team.
Other guys with similar or better production to him..
Markov
Krug
Boychuk
Hell, even Dion Phaneuf who some call not even a top pairing D has 1 less point and is only a -4.
OEL is so over rated it's not funny. He doesn't bring D, and is average O. His skating ability makes him over rated. Those who call him a #1 now, are Franson, Phaneuf, Faulk, and Krug number 1's now?
Oh lets despell some myths I know I'll get...
But he is Young!
Age 23. Not like he is an 18 year old. His age adds value, but lets not act like every player magically becomes elite if he isn't close before.
He plays on a bad team!
Yup, so do Faulk and the leaf players. They still put up similar offensive numbers, and Arizona is a much better defensive team than both of those clubs, yet their players have better +/-.
Also Yandle has managed to put up 30+ points on the same team, yet isn't called an elite #1.
I also assume some people will dismiss this because I used +/-, my answer for them is that any stat shouldn't count unless it is assists and goals then. Even things like Corsi you can use the same arguments people use against +/-.