burstnbloom
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2006
- 4,552
- 3,980
5.75M a steal? Is he a Norris candidate that I am not aware?
Uh...should be?
5.75M a steal? Is he a Norris candidate that I am not aware?
That is really hard to say. So much of what a player can do depends upon fit these days. Even the greatest players. Pelech plays with as part of a pairing that communicates automatically. Pelech-Pulock have been together for years, and it shows.
NYI's most recent Barzal memories are of him playing with a giant hole offensively at LW. He is a puck distributor. That was going to hurt him, and it did.
It is really an unfair comparison. But what it also shows is that Pelech's contract is only part one - NYI have to start working on Pulock's extension.
It's a good contract, think people are a bit over the top on how good. It's a Lindell contract who is a comp.
And what does all that mean? It seems more like gibirish from baseball analytics.
Which part?And what does all that mean? It seems more like gibirish from baseball analytics.
CaUsE pOiNtS
Maybe that has to change.With all due respect to Pelech, but...yes? Points matter? Has there ever been an era where two-way defensemen weren't the one's winning the Norris? Closest I can think of is Rod Langway going back-to-back.
With all due respect to Pelech, but...yes? Points matter? Has there ever been an era where two-way defensemen weren't the one's winning the Norris? Closest I can think of is Rod Langway going back-to-back.
You seem to be in the minority........
........wait, no, you're the only one thinking this.
EDIT: Wait!! You've got company now!! JeffreyLFC has entered the game!!
Maybe that has to change.
Points totals for D-men matter less when power plays are fewer.
Consider that an era of few power plays, NYI games have FAR fewer than most.
Even strength play is magnified.
Also, Pelech has a little bit of Chara in him. His offensive game is growing. You can see he has more flair than he typically shows. I suspect he's being encouraged to use it more.
Unfortunately, the Norris has devolved over the years to an award that looks first at points, with too little regard to how well a given player actually plays defense. He's a cornerstone defenseman that's a must have on any team that actually wants to win something. He'll never win a Norris because he'll never put up enough points, but that's fine -- he's more valuable than many that have won the award.
Well, if his offensive game grows, hopefully he'll get more Norris talk. And if power plays are fewer for everybody, I don't see how that affects how points should be taken into accounts. I don't think Pelech gets marks because his team obtains fewer power plays.
Unfortunately, the Norris has devolved over the years to an award that looks first at points, with too little regard to how well a given player actually plays defense. He's a cornerstone defenseman that's a must have on any team that actually wants to win something. He'll never win a Norris because he'll never put up enough points, but that's fine -- he's more valuable than many that have won the award.