BigEezyE22
Continuing to not support HF.
Yikes
Like I said before...the important thing is giving the award to a guy from the right part of Canada playing for a Canadian team.
Yikes
Why is it that when Rielly got off to his hot start all the non Leafs fans on here said it's to early to give Rielly the Norris Trophy, even though Leafs fans only said he should be considered the favorite. So is it not hypocritical saying that Karlsson should win it because he's currently on a hot streak?And Karlson played another mins crunching game. 27:34, where he was 29:15, and 30:54 in the previous 2 games. The more he plays the better EK is. It is a bonus to have a D man that can log mins and not only handle it, but whose play improves with more mins. With half a season to go, wouldn't surprise me if EK wins another Norris if he continues to hit his stride. Who are we kidding, he has hit it. 19 points in his last 11 games, eating up mins and Sharks winning.
The only reason someone like Erik Karlsson has won the Norris 2x was because of his offensive numbers. So once again I will ask isn't it hypocritical saying that's the only reason Rielly could win it, since Karlsson has won it for the same reason?At least they got Gio right. Were always going to see the Toronto bias, but Reilly should be a distant second IMO and only there because of his offensive numbers. Goaltending and offense in general is carrying the Leafs, not their amazing defense.
Why is it that when Rielly got off to his hot start all the non Leafs fans on here said it's to early to give Rielly the Norris Trophy, even though Leafs fans only said he should be considered the favorite. So is it not hypocritical saying that Karlsson should win it because he's currently on a hot streak?
The only reason someone like Erik Karlsson has won the Norris 2x was because of his offensive numbers. So once again I will ask isn't it hypocritical saying that's the only reason Rielly could win it, since Karlsson has won it for the same reason?
Why is it that when Rielly got off to his hot start all the non Leafs fans on here said it's to early to give Rielly the Norris Trophy, even though Leafs fans only said he should be considered the favorite. So is it not hypocritical saying that Karlsson should win it because he's currently on a hot streak?
Yes I am. Whenever I hear about Karlsson winning the Norris 2x during his career I remember others saying a major reason was his offensive numbers during those seasons.You're not serious, are you?
So you are going to penalize Rielly for playing in Toronto and it's market size? Other people refer to Oliver Ekman-Larsson as a future Norris Trophy winner and he's playing in Arizona which we know is not a major NHL market. The same thing can be said about Victor Hedman. I'm not saying he didn't deserve the Norris last year, however he let his play do the talking and Tampa is still not in the same league as a major market compared to Toronto. Hell the numbers show that Rielly is on pace to have better numbers than Hedman did last season.No, it's not, because before this season, if he was on any other team, nobody has heard of Morgan Reilly. Meanwhile, Erik Karlsson is already a first ballot Hall of Famer.
I can't believe I had to explain that to you.
Rielly is still leading all defensemen in total goals with 13 and is only 4 points behind Bruins with 45. So his argument is far from gone.Rielly isn't even leading defensemen scoring anymore, so his primary argument for the Norris is gone at this point. Burns is outscoring him in raw numbers and PPG.
Rielly isn't even leading defensemen scoring anymore, so his primary argument for the Norris is gone at this point. Burns is outscoring him in raw numbers and PPG.
No, it's not, because before this season, if he was on any other team, nobody has heard of Morgan Reilly. Meanwhile, Erik Karlsson is already a first ballot Hall of Famer.
I can't believe I had to explain that to you.
In the end it's clearly obvious that you are only pumping the tires of Karlsson and Burns because of their recent hot streaks, along with your hatred of all things Maple Leafs because it's your agenda. The fact is when Rielly got off to his amazing start everyone who is not a Leafs fan tried to come up with every excuse why Rielly should not win the Norris. So just because he is no longer the points leader among defensemen is a reason to say he has no chance at winning it, however Burns chances went up because he's now leading defensemen in scoring? It's the same argument Leafs fans said about Rielly which we were told was not valid.Thanks. I didn't think an explanation was needed. Apparently this isn't the case, even when It is obvious to most.
That probably says a lot more about you than anything.No, it's not, because before this season, if he was on any other team, nobody has heard of Morgan Reilly. Meanwhile, Erik Karlsson is already a first ballot Hall of Famer.
I can't believe I had to explain that to you.
The point is the thread was ...In the end it's clearly obvious that you are only pumping the tires of Karlsson and Burns because of their recent hot streaks, along with your hatred of all things Maple Leafs because it's your agenda. The fact is when Rielly got off to his amazing start everyone who is not a Leafs fan tried to come up with every excuse why Rielly should not win the Norris. So just because he is no longer the points leader among defensemen is a reason to say he has no chance at winning it, however Burns chances went up because he's now leading defensemen in scoring? It's the same argument Leafs fans said about Rielly which we were told was not valid.
So much for that historical season.Rielly isn't even leading defensemen scoring anymore, so his primary argument for the Norris is gone at this point. Burns is outscoring him in raw numbers and PPG.
Whatever your opinion is no one can deny that when Rielly was leading all defensemen in scoring and long before this thread was ever created, the non Leafs fans on here said that stat never mattered. So just because Burns now leads all defensemen in total points all of the sudden if you don't like the Leafs something like that now matters? I say that's the definition of hypocrisy.The point is the thread was ...
Norris Trophy Power Rankings: Rielly on top with gaudy offensive numbers
Some were pumping the tires of Rielly because as the title said.... his gaudy offensive numbers.
Now that some other player has taken over that spot those same fans backing up Rielly should now be backing up Burns or does those gaudy offensive numbers not so important now.
You’re reaching dudeRielly is still leading all defensemen in total goals with 13 and is only 4 points behind Bruins with 45. So his argument is far from gone.
Also this reply is exactly what I was referring to before. When Rielly was leading all defensemen in scoring we were told it didn't matter about his chance to win the Norris. All of the sudden now that Brent Burns is leading them in scoring all of the sudden it matters.
So your in agreement that Burns is now the front leader? If not than that is also the definition of hypocrisy.Whatever your opinion is no one can deny that when Rielly was leading all defensemen in scoring and long before this thread was ever created, the non Leafs fans on here said that stat never mattered. So just because Burns now leads all defensemen in total points all of the sudden if you don't like the Leafs something like that now matters? I say that's the definition of hypocrisy.
Those were the days. I mean you still got the leaf defenseman thing going for ya but that's not saying much.So far this is the best performance we've seen from a dman since the days of Lidstrom at least. Maybe even further back.
Maybe the best performance by a Leaf dman, or any dman playing for an Ontario team, ever.
Let's hope he keeps it up, it's incredibly entertaining.