TheDoldrums
Registered User
I don't know why this isn't brought up more, but Rielly has a oiSH% of 15, he's never had a season above 10. Having 15% is unsustainable for a forward and even more so for a defenseman.
this makes no sense
I don't know why this isn't brought up more, but Rielly has a oiSH% of 15, he's never had a season above 10. Having 15% is unsustainable for a forward and even more so for a defenseman.
Subban, Ellis, Ekholm, and Josi dominated. Clearly the 4 best d men on the ice tonight. There is a difference of reading offensive stats lines, and watching how a D dominates on both sides of the puck.
this makes no sense
I Yes I defended him more than anyone.Did you miss the 512,125 Karlsson threads when he was in Ottawa?
I think it may happen with the Leafs and their forwards. It should not, but sometimes it really hurts your overall votes to have 2 players competing for 1 trophy.How exactly do people believe votes would get "split" between Karlsson and Burns? You don't only get to vote for one player per team.
For what award?I think it may happen with the Leafs and their forwards.
He ended up with 3 A (2 primary, 1 secondary) in a 3-1 win.
Just a suggestion but your time is better served not discoursing with the drama queen.
I hate that the only measure to determine a Norris winner is points. It's a defensive award, it should be overall play.
Rielly has 1 pt in his last 5 games, Karlsson has 12 pts in his last 5 games. This is the problem of declarations at the time of this OP was created. 35+ games. Sample size will weed out the pretenders.Leads Norris rankings but isn't good enough for the all star game, huh?
When will they realize that if they're going to be having all stars, it should be about the best players?
What exactly is a defensman supposed to be? Just someone who produces or someone who produces and defends? I said overall ability but the award is always given to the top point scorer irregardless of how he plays defensively. Which is his role.It is NOT a defensive award. It is for the top DEFENSEMAN. As in the top player who plays on the backend. The best defence can no doubt be a killer offence.
So Matty Ekholm?What exactly is a defensman supposed to be? Just someone who produces or someone who produces and defends? I said overall ability but the award is always given to the top point scorer irregardless of how he plays defensively. Which is his role.
"The James Norris Memorial Trophy, or simply the Norris Trophy, is awarded annually to the National Hockey League's top "defense player who demonstrates throughout the season the greatest all-round ability in the position". It is named after James E. Norris, the longtime owner of the Detroit Red Wings."
Tell me that they always give the trophy as per the definition above.
Rielly has 1 pt in his last 5 games, Karlsson has 12 pts in his last 5 games. This is the problem of declarations at the time of this OP was created. 35+ games. Sample size will weed out the pretenders.
This Burns and EK thing is insane. I cannot recall anything like this, not even Pronger and Niedermayer.
So Matty Ekholm?
Leads Norris rankings but isn't good enough for the all star game, huh?
When will they realize that if they're going to be having all stars, it should be about the best players?
Right now i'd say Giordano is the best overall defenseman.So Matty Ekholm?
I hate that the only measure to determine a Norris winner is points. It's a defensive award, it should be overall play.
Not sure why your take is better. Sarcasm. Nice, very clever.What a fresh and hot take.
and I couldn't argue against it much.Right now i'd say Giordano is the best overall defenseman.