Blue Jays Discussion: No More AA, Everyone is very Sad (and by Sad, I mean Mad)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Muston Atthews

Bunch of Bangerz
Jul 2, 2009
32,642
5,008
Toronto, Ontario
If Shapiro really wants to have full control of baseball ops, I don't really know why Rogers has decided to give him the keys to the franchise.

Since 2010, Cleveland has gone 475-496. The Blue Jays 489-483.

I mean, I'd understand if it was a guy like Dombrowski, who's had sustained success... but I can't see how Shapiro is an upgrade over AA on the baseball side.

And sure, he had to work with a lower payroll. But he also wasn't in a division with the Yankees and Red Sox every year.

Maybe it'll work out... who knows. But in terms of optics, this is terrible for Rogers, and I don't think the potential benefit outweighs that.

Best case scenario, Shapiro takes the team to the WS next year, but AA still gets most of the credit. If they don't make the playoffs... well all that blame is going on him.

Cleveland won one less game than we did this year and missed the playoffs while we won the AL East.
 

DaveMatthew

Bring in Peter
Apr 13, 2005
14,507
13,180
Ott
Yes. He was. His previous job was as GM to report to Paul Beeston. His offered job was as GM to report to Mark Shapiro. Only thing that changed was the man he would have to report to. Everything I've heard is that he didn't want to report to anyone anymore. His ego took hold.

Main difference was that Beeston wasn't involved in most of the baseball ops. He let AA run the show. Shapiro was not going to do that.
 

one77

Registered User
Dec 22, 2013
2,243
45
Replacing AA with Shapiro... brutal. 3 steps back for the Jays here. Hopefully this does not spell the end of the team we had this year. Hopefully Rogers gives Shapiro the go ahead to spend money and add to this team. Come back stronger next year.

But I have my doubts, in both Rogers and in Shapiro. I think this is the end of the team we saw this year. Price likely isn't going to be signed, would not surprise me if Shapiro traded Bautista/Encarnacion/Tulo as well... This is going to bring the Jays back to the dark days.
 

Morguee

Registered User
Jan 22, 2010
3,002
184
If Shapiro really wants to have full control of baseball ops, I don't really know why Rogers has decided to give him the keys to the franchise.

Since 2010, Cleveland has gone 475-496. The Blue Jays 489-483.

I mean, I'd understand if it was a guy like Dombrowski, who's had sustained success... but I can't see how Shapiro is an upgrade over AA on the baseball side.

And sure, he had to work with a lower payroll. But he also wasn't in a division with the Yankees and Red Sox every year.

Maybe it'll work out... who knows. But in terms of optics, this is terrible for Rogers, and I don't think the potential benefit outweighs that.

Best case scenario, Shapiro takes the team to the WS next year, but AA still gets most of the credit. If they don't make the playoffs... well all that blame is going on him.

Yes, because AA is leaving him a solid starting pitching rotation and very deep and experienced bullpen. I also don't forsee Tulo, EE and Bautista ever being hurt for long periods of time next year. This team may be in for a hell of a reality check next year.
 

theaub

34-38-61-10-13-15
Nov 21, 2008
18,886
1,977
Toronto
During AA's reign, the Jays had a better record than Cleveland 4/6 years

This means absolutely nothing, as Shapiro wasn't even the GM. But I still don't know where this argument is going on either side.
 

DaveMatthew

Bring in Peter
Apr 13, 2005
14,507
13,180
Ott
Yes, because AA is leaving him a solid starting pitching rotation and very deep and experienced bullpen. I also don't forsee Tulo, EE and Bautista ever being hurt for long periods of time next year. This team may be in for a hell of a reality check next year.

I didn't say he deserved the blame, but the casual fan (the fan that Rogers needs to most) will blame it on this change.
 

Muston Atthews

Bunch of Bangerz
Jul 2, 2009
32,642
5,008
Toronto, Ontario
Main difference was that Beeston wasn't involved in most of the baseball ops. He let AA run the show. Shapiro was not going to do that.

He wasn't involved but had the ability to nix deals, and he did. The difference is that AA had a trusting relationship with Beeston where Beeston didn't have to get involved in baseball ops. He assumingly did not have the same relationship with Shapiro and was not willing to try and build that.
 

KuleminFan41

Registered User
Jan 5, 2009
5,845
614
If Shapiro really wants to have full control of baseball ops, I don't really know why Rogers has decided to give him the keys to the franchise.

Since 2010, Cleveland has gone 475-496. The Blue Jays 489-483.

I mean, I'd understand if it was a guy like Dombrowski, who's had sustained success... but I can't see how Shapiro is an upgrade over AA.

And sure, he had to work with a lower payroll. But he also wasn't in a division with the Yankees and Red Sox every year.
Shapiro has 2 executive of the year awards. Cleveland also lost in a game 7 in the ALCS against the eventual winners Red Sox all the while having one of the lowest budgets in baseball. People need to stop acting like he doesn't know what he's doing.

Also, that record is a little misleading. You can't exactly cherry pick stats just because it works for you. in 2013 the Indians won 92 ball games and in 2015 the Jays won 93. I can cherry pick stats too, since 2011 the Indians have had a better record than the Jays with 406-403 and 398-412 for the Jays. All the while having consistently in the bottom 5-10 in payroll except for 2013 where they were 14th .
 

Jack Bauer

Registered User
May 30, 2007
6,154
743
Cape Breton
I didn't say he deserved the blame, but the casual fan (the fan that Rogers needs to most) will blame it on this change.

They're also the fan who cares the least about all that stuff when the team is doing well.

It wasn't casual fans chanting Thank You Alex in Baltimore. Casual fans didn't even know who the Jays GM was until the last week of September.
 

DaveMatthew

Bring in Peter
Apr 13, 2005
14,507
13,180
Ott
Shapiro has 2 executive of the year awards. Cleveland also lost in a game 7 in the ALCS against the eventual winners Red Sox all the while having one of the lowest budgets in baseball. People need to stop acting like he doesn't know what he's doing.

Also, that record is a little misleading. You can't exactly cherry pick stats just because it works for you. in 2013 the Indians won 92 ball games and in 2015 the Jays won 93. I can cherry pick stats too, since 2011 the Indians have had a better record than the Jays with 406-403 and 398-412 for the Jays. All the while having consistently in the bottom 5-10 in payroll except for 2013 where they were 14th .

So basically it looks like a very lateral move... in terms of performance of their respective teams. Yes, Shapiro was handicapped by his budget, but Anthopoulos was handicapped by playing in a division with the Red Sox and Yankees, who spend money as if they print it.

Why make the change then?

I'm sure there are plenty of more than capable execs out there who'd be great at managing the stadium upgrades and corporate sales strategy while leaving AA to baseball ops.
 

bullocks

Registered User
Jun 26, 2007
5,780
9
Toronto
Shapiro has 2 executive of the year awards. Cleveland also lost in a game 7 in the ALCS against the eventual winners Red Sox all the while having one of the lowest budgets in baseball. People need to stop acting like he doesn't know what he's doing.

Also, that record is a little misleading. You can't exactly cherry pick stats just because it works for you. in 2013 the Indians won 92 ball games and in 2015 the Jays won 93. I can cherry pick stats too, since 2011 the Indians have had a better record than the Jays with 406-403 and 398-412 for the Jays. All the while having consistently in the bottom 5-10 in payroll except for 2013 where they were 14th .

Indians also played in quite the easy division.
 

Muston Atthews

Bunch of Bangerz
Jul 2, 2009
32,642
5,008
Toronto, Ontario
You'd think so, but from 2010-2014 the Indians went 394-416, and the Jays went 396-414.

I meant the two years prior to this year.

How could u get your facts messed up? If Cleavland finished with one less win they would have easily made the playoffs :huh:

Because I've been reading a lot of different facts for a while now and I messed up years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad