robertmac43
Forever 43!
- Mar 31, 2015
- 25,048
- 17,263
That is true. 48 Tracks is a nice addition.But it's essentially the content of a new game for a really good price.
That is true. 48 Tracks is a nice addition.But it's essentially the content of a new game for a really good price.
I mean MK8D will have almost 100 tracks by the time this is said and done. MK9 would have way too much to live up to at this point.The obvious downside is that there definitely won't be a Mario Kart 9 for the very foreseeable future. Maybe a Switch 2 launch title at the earliest at this point.
Still no BotW2 news isn't too surprising, but it's hard to not feel worried about its development given how little we've gotten. Granted, they could announce it for December 2022 as late as this summer and still have a half a year to hype it up to hell and back, so I don't see it as indicative of anything that it wasn't included. If we don't hear anything by the 4th of July, that's when I'll start worrying.
I wonder how much of that 48 tracks is going to be gutted from Tour.
There's a lot of great tracks in the history of that series but 48 is a huge order to fill and will almost assuredly deplete the list for Mario Kart 9, whenever it does come out.
Square's quest to put every RPG of theirs that isn't FF1-6 is coming along beautifully.
If any game doesn't need fan hype to sell ridiculous copies, it's BoTW 2. They could literally just say it is coming out tomorrow and it will break 10m sales insanely fast and probably hit close to 20m overall. The original has sold like 25m while rarely going on sale.The obvious downside is that there definitely won't be a Mario Kart 9 for the very foreseeable future. Maybe a Switch 2 launch title at the earliest at this point.
Still no BotW2 news isn't too surprising, but it's hard to not feel worried about its development given how little we've gotten. Granted, they could announce it for December 2022 as late as this summer and still have a half a year to hype it up to hell and back, so I don't see it as indicative of anything that it wasn't included. If we don't hear anything by the 4th of July, that's when I'll start worrying.
I have an impossible time imagining that they won't eventually put the Pixel Remasters on the Switch. They probably just want to milk the mobile and PC market as long as possible before finally releasing them on the consoles, which would be their biggest bread and butter.
I mean they really should've announced that from the get go but it's Square, I don't trust them to make rational decisions. I do hope they're coming at some point.I have an impossible time imagining that they won't eventually put the Pixel Remasters on the Switch. They probably just want to milk the mobile and PC market as long as possible before finally releasing them on the consoles, which would be their biggest bread and butter.
I mean they really should've announced that from the get go but it's Square, I don't trust them to make rational decisions. I do hope they're coming at some point.
Square's quest to put every RPG of theirs that isn't FF1-6 is coming along beautifully.
I actually said a while ago that Three Houses would be perfect for a Dynasty Warriors-esque game. Some people want Ike/Roy to be in one of these but I mean meh...Is there a fanbase more upset at their series popularity then Fire Emblem fans?
You would think the Warriors game was a damn war crime with how some are reacting.
If there was something else on the horizon then that’s one thing. They could have said hey the PoR/Radiant Dawn will be remade on the Switch but here’s this game to pass the time. It would have a huge reception. Issue is it feels like they are just like hey I know you want this but there’s this that you don’t want. As a huge FE fan, I find these hack and slash games to be cheap gimmicks.Is there a fanbase more upset at their series popularity then Fire Emblem fans?
You would think the Warriors game was a damn war crime with how some are reacting.