The downside with trading Nils is that we know 200% that we will get a long term injury at RD early in the season if he is traded.
0, but he stomped his feet and slammed doors and was heard saying I HATE YOU! when Drury told him to go to his roomHow many games did Jones refuse to dress for?
Yep. That’s why I think the move is to rotate him with Schneider paired with Lindgren. Keep seven defensemen involved. See what happens. Schneider has been good but sophomore slump is a thing. He’ll benefit from some days off. Maybe Nils could even play the left a bit with Trouba too. No team gets through a season with just six defensemen.The downside with trading Nils is that we know 200% that we will get a long term injury at RD early in the season if he is traded.
Has he said he’ll be holding out? I thought he made a trade request only. If he’s holding out, that’s a different story. I wasn’t aware. I hope he changes his mind if so.Are people still thinking if we don't trade him he's going to show up for camp after he said he wasn't? I don't. If someone says he/she are going to do something I usually take them at their word. So if we don't move him I'm guessing he's in Sweden and not here and not going to be part of the equation if one of our RD's get hurt.
Brooks said in the original report that Lundkvist was unlikely to report to camp if he wasn't dealt. Then the other day Arthur Staple said that a source said it was like 80% or something that Lundkvist wouldn't report if he wasn't dealt. I'm not sure that it's a certainty, but it does seem like a very real possibility.Has he said he’ll be holding out? I thought he made a trade request only. If he’s holding out, that’s a different story. I wasn’t aware. I hope he changes his mind if so.
So, it was a steaming heap of bullshit.0, but he stomped his feet and slammed doors and was heard saying I HATE YOU! when Drury told him to go to his room
would be a shame because - just looking at the camp roster - it seems he’s almost a shoo-in to make the team.Brooks said in the original report that Lundkvist was unlikely to report to camp if he wasn't dealt. Then the other day Arthur Staple said that a source said it was like 80% or something that Lundkvist wouldn't report if he wasn't dealt. I'm not sure that it's a certainty, but it does seem like a very real possibility.
Sounds like the 3 RD are set with Trouba, Fox, and Schneider, and 2 LD with Miller and Lindgren. So there's one spot up for grabs and I guess the thinking is that Jones has the inside track there, maybe, but that in any event Lundkvist would still have to win a spot and then it's likely on the left--and I guess he's not interested in getting third pair minutes with no real PP time, and wants to go somewhere with a less-established D chart.would be a shame because - just looking at the camp roster - it seems he’s almost a shoo-in to make the team.
I get it. But we all know seven or eight defensemen get significant time every year on every team. If Nils is gonna be on the NHL roster making NHL money, and able to at least showcase himself…on a contender, no less…I don’t know what else he can reasonably expect. Especially after last season. It’s not like he blew the doors off the AHL, let alone the NHL.Sounds like the 3 RD are set with Trouba, Fox, and Schneider, and 2 LD with Miller and Lindgren. So there's one spot up for grabs and I guess the thinking is that Jones has the inside track there, maybe, but that in any event Lundkvist would still have to win a spot and then it's likely on the left--and I guess he's not interested in getting third pair minutes with no real PP time, and wants to go somewhere with a less-established D chart.
Yeah, I generally agree. I understand why he wants to be traded to a team that maybe has a more immediate need for what he brings, but I feel like he should at least report and give it a go. I don't think he helps himself if he doesn't report.I get it. But we all know seven or eight defensemen get significant time every year on every team. If Nils is gonna be on the NHL roster making NHL money, and able to at least showcase himself…on a contender, no less…I don’t know what else he can reasonably expect. Especially after last season. It’s not like he blew the doors off the AHL, let alone the NHL.
I mean, it’s possible he’s not even considered a hopeful to make the team as the 7D. And if that’s the case and he knows it - sure, force a trade. But does anyone think Hajek is blocking him? If so, well, either Nils is not that good or the rangers are off their rocker.
Also, another factor, there are a ton of experienced defensemen squeezed into PTOs. The competition for those 6/7D slots is going to be fierce. How many cushy landing spots are there?
Seems to me he should be the 7D and also I think that’s pretty fair and good for both Nils and the Rangers.
I agree, I’m not a fan of this ongoing trend of younger players who haven’t proven much making demands of playing time, roster spots or even money coming off their ELC, I get where he’s coming from but how about zip it and show up with something to prove? Make the organization have to make a difficult decision and peak the interest of other teams through your play because if you’re good enough, one way or another, you’re gonna land on your feet somewhereYeah, I generally agree. I understand why he wants to be traded to a team that maybe has a more immediate need for what he brings, but I feel like he should at least report and give it a go. I don't think he helps himself if he doesn't report.
Totally. The weakness in Nils’ argument is that there aren’t many teams looking for him. Who’s gonna give him a top six defense spot, let alone power play time. I mean, it seems pretty flakey, more than anything else.Yeah, I generally agree. I understand why he wants to be traded to a team that maybe has a more immediate need for what he brings, but I feel like he should at least report and give it a go. I don't think he helps himself if he doesn't report.
Totally. The weakness in Nils’ argument is that there aren’t many teams looking for him. Who’s gonna give him a top six defense spot, let alone power play time. I mean, it seems pretty flakey, more than anything else.
Which is why I think he ends up reporting, makes the team as 7D, and gets a pretty good amount of ice time.
This is our hell, Murphys law. Troubas groin is goin to explode the second the league approves the dealThe downside with trading Nils is that we know 200% that we will get a long term injury at RD early in the season if he is traded.
I imagine Nils wants to play in the NHL sooner rather than later. And it's probably not a great idea to tell anyone that you plan to trade the guy you just named captain in a couple years.Apologies if this has been brought up, but what do we think about this scenario?
We tell Nils to go back to Sweden and make his money for 2 years and when Trouba's NMC turns to a NTC, we trade him and Nils takes his place.
Paying for Fox and bringing him in early was 100% the right move. The wait and see approach to get Fox for free, season later, would have been the wrong move.Arthur Staple
Which team offered a high 2nd round pick? Buffalo? Montreal? Buffalo has the Flyers 2nd in June. Gorton paid two 2nds to Carolina for Fox. He could have waited one more year and signed Fox as a free agent. Two 2nds from the Habs. 2023 and 2025.
There is an 80% chance Lundkvist will stay in Sweden until a trade is made. It would be hard to trade him if the Rangers loaned him to Lulea who is not looking for a short term commitment. They would want him to play the entire season there.
Drury can play hardball here. If you don’t report to Rangers camp on September 21, I will loan you to Lulea for the entire season. I will retain your rights. The Lundkvist trade is not making or breaking the Rangers season.
Staple believes the Rangers could bring in Nathan Beaulieu as depth on D. 7/8 D in the organization. He played for Gallant and Kelly in the Q.
I get it. But we all know seven or eight defensemen get significant time every year on every team. If Nils is gonna be on the NHL roster making NHL money, and able to at least showcase himself…on a contender, no less…I don’t know what else he can reasonably expect. Especially after last season. It’s not like he blew the doors off the AHL, let alone the NHL.
I mean, it’s possible he’s not even considered a hopeful to make the team as the 7D. And if that’s the case and he knows it - sure, force a trade. But does anyone think Hajek is blocking him? If so, well, either Nils is not that good or the rangers are off their rocker.
Also, another factor, there are a ton of experienced defensemen squeezed into PTOs. The competition for those 6/7D slots is going to be fierce. How many cushy landing spots are there?
Seems to me he should be the 7D and also I think that’s pretty fair and good for both Nils and the Rangers.
I imagine Nils wants to play in the NHL sooner rather than later. And it's probably not a great idea to tell anyone that you plan to trade the guy you just named captain in a couple years.
Can anyone explain why this hasn't triggered everyone like when Kravtsov left, only difference is that Kravtsov actually showed up at camp and then left, by the sounds of it this kid isn't even gonna attempt to make the team and doesn't want to report to Hartford so he's looking for a trade. There is a spot open on the left side if he wants to compete for that spot, and maybe if he shows them he is the next best dman they might even move Schneider to the left side who knows?
He never said that though. Brooks threw that line in at the end basically as a rumor. Way too much misinformation going around. Lets see where Nils is in 10 days as camp approaches, i’m sure he will be there.Are people still thinking if we don't trade him he's going to show up for camp after he said he wasn't? I don't. If someone says he/she are going to do something I usually take them at their word. So if we don't move him I'm guessing he's in Sweden and not here and not going to be part of the equation if one of our RD's get hurt.