RussianGuyovich
Hella Ennui
- Jan 2, 2007
- 10,132
- 8,443
The Hart is a tough one. I watched the Oilers play the Avalanche on Friday and when Rantanen left the game the Avalanche roster sure looked weak. If the Oilers somehow win their division which seemed absolutely laughable to even think possible early in the season, McDavid has a pretty strong case. Kucherov has been great all season long. It's a tough one. All 3 are deserving winners,
That is why it's such a hard decision. You think that is the most important factor and another person can point to other factors as to why another player is deserving. Everyone values different factors differently and more then just one factor needs to be considered. A solid argument can be made for all three.It's Kuch's to lose. He is 51 Points ahead of his closest teammate.
What factors? Kuch is more important to his team than any other player. And the gap between 1'st & 2'd is much larger in Tampa than in other teams.That is why it's such a hard decision. You think that is the most important factor and another person can point to other factors as to why another player is deserving. Everyone values different factors differently and more then just one factor needs to be considered. A solid argument can be made for all three.
If that is all you look at that is fine but I do not necessarily agree. I think Tampa Bay has a better forward group then Colorado does.What factors? Kuch is more important to his team than any other player. And the gap between 1'st & 2'd is much larger in Tampa than in other teams.
Doubtful. Tampa wouldn't have been in Playoffs without Kuch. Lightning have been awful this season, especially early this season. Vasy was horrible too.Tampa Bay's forward group is better then Colorado's. Just because Colorado's second best player is better then Tampa Bay's that really doesn't matter. I look deeper then that.
Without Mackinnon, Colorado would definitely not have made the playoffs with their weak depth and goaltending. Edmonton probably wouldn't have made the playoffs either without McDavid, Edmonton was at the bottom with San Jose at one point this season when McDavid was not playing well. I guess it depends on who a person thinks was most valuable to their teams success. All 3 have great arguments.Doubtful. Tampa wouldn't have been in Playoffs without Kuch. Lightning have been awful this season, especially early this season. Vasy was horrible too.
Kuch was only bright light of this team.
Without Mackinnon, Colorado would definitely not have made the playoffs with their weak depth and goaltending. Edmonton wouldn't have made the playoffs either without McDavid, That argument is the same for all 3 teams.
Very good point but not only point to point towards.It's Kuch's to lose. He is 51 Points ahead of his closest teammate.
This.That is why it's such a hard decision. You think that is the most important factor and another person can point to other factors as to why another player is deserving. Everyone values different factors differently and more then just one factor needs to be considered. A solid argument can be made for all three.
I don't know. Their goaltending is not that good and Nishushkin missed a lot of games. Outside of Mackinnon and Rantanen I don't think their roster overall has been that great for a lot of the season. I guess the issue I have is I like Tampa's roster more then Colorado's or Edmonton's.I think Colorado would still be a Playoff team.
*and peak Crosby (and everyone in the cap era minus last season and 2021 McDavid). Robert Frost couldn’t write that.Kucherov eclipsing mcdavid whilst we are in the middle of a solar eclipse. Oh the poetry....
Sounds like McDuevid and DueKinnon need to be better about spreading the wealth.Very good point but not only point to point towards.
This.
I am leaning towards Kucherov though.
Tampa Bay has Kucherov and 4 players above 70 points.
Colorado has Mckinnon and 2 guys above 70
McDavid has him and 3 guys above 70.
Not Just point gap from 1st to 2nd in my opinion matters. I thought McDavids would be 1 and 2. Forgot Bouchard is kicking ass.
It was a simple observation that encompassed the duration that most people consider the current era of hockey. If I wanted to make a really stupid post, I would have said 1917-18 Joe Malone would have scored 180 goals at his pace against today's scrubs. Let's put '92 LaFontaine in today's NHL against 6'6" goaltenders playing the butterfly style and 3rd and 4th liners that would be playing in the AHL and ECHL today.what a stupid post, pat LaFontaines 148 point season wins the Ross every year except mcdavids during the same time frame.
I think Colorado would still be a Playoff team.
isn't it a coincidence how scoring has gone up and everyone under the sun is having career yearsIt was a simple observation that encompassed the duration that most people consider the current era of hockey. If I wanted to make a really stupid post, I would have said 1917-18 Joe Malone would have scored 180 goals at his pace against today's scrubs. Let's put '92 LaFontaine in today's NHL against 6'6" goaltenders playing the butterfly style and 3rd and 4th liners that would be playing in the AHL and ECHL today.
I think the tide might be turning a bit on that. Seems like, as conversations become more serious, and voters/media actually research what they're talking about a bit, most people I've heard/seen lately are saying Kucherov even if he doesn't win the Art Ross.IMO Kucherov will need to hit 100+ assists and win the Ross by double digits to win the Hart, and even then I don't trust voters to do the right thing considering past trophy voting.
I think the tide might be turning a bit on that. Seems like, as conversations become more serious, and voters/media actually research what they're talking about a bit, most people I've heard/seen lately are saying Kucherov even if he doesn't win the Art Ross.
I think Colorado would still be a Playoff team.
That's more about TB's defense and goaltending. It's a lot worse when he's not on the ice.Its weird that Kuch is only at +8 as a player with 138 points.