GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 192,874
- 43,420
Last edited:
stanley cup wining NAK says hello..If the talent to only be a middle/bottom sixer is there, then years of lost development that squanders necessary skills for the NHL isn't going to be overcome. There's a reason why the Flyers can only succeed with the players who were too good to fail and can't manage to reliably produce anything else while other teams can.
stanley cup wining NAK says hello..
Discarded forward NAK says hello, so his money could be used on a 35 year old scrub forward.stanley cup wining NAK says hello..
It is a mixture of both being bad at drafting and development. Not 1 player they didn't "develop" has gone anywhere to produce anything significant in the last decade or so.If the talent to only be a middle/bottom sixer is there, then years of lost development that squanders necessary skills for the NHL isn't going to be overcome. There's a reason why the Flyers can only succeed with the players who were too good to fail and can't manage to reliably produce anything else while other teams can.
One also wonders why they drafted players who didn't have the talent.Yeah, the guy whose career is probably dead if a smart team doesn't grab him on waivers.
One wonders what other useful players were crushed by the team
It is a mixture of both being bad at drafting and development. Not 1 player they didn't "develop" has gone anywhere to produce anything significant in the last decade or so.
One also wonders why they drafted players who didn't have the talent.
Do you not find it odd at all that all these guys the Flyers didn't "develop" didn't go anywhere to amount to anything?
Not a single one went elsewhere to carve any success. Seems to me it is the drafting is the bigger issue.They're not going to amount to anything after years of the Flyers developing away all necessary skills in favor of "safe" grinding. They're ruined.
The Flyers draft classes were widely regarded as obviously talented at the time they were drafted and they were all turned into mush. Even the "successes" in TK, Sanheim, and Provorov have all fallen short of expectations in some way for various reasons, many not remotely their fault.
Discarded forward NAK says hello, so his money could be used on a 35 year old scrub forward.
We didn't have the players that would make sense in that kind of deal.
Why would you trade Farabee (22) and ??? (have to match cap and value) for Tkachuk (24) if you're rebuilding?
Yeah but did they play with Makar?Helm and Cogliano were useful players on a Cup winning team, which is why Colorado kept them. Obviously you have zero idea what a Cup winning roster looks like if you think they are equivalent to an actual scrub like MacEwen who would never get near a regular lineup spot on a team like the Avs.
Cogliano - 16 points in 64 regular season games, 6 points in 16 playoff games
Helm - 15 points in 68 regular season games, 5 points in 20 playoff games
MacEwen - 9 points in SEVENTY FIVE regular season games
Not a single one went elsewhere to carve any success. Seems to me it is the drafting is the bigger issue.
If you have the talent you will overcome the bad development if you leave. None have. Not buying the they ruined him angle as much as you push it.
Yes, none of them become anything else because the Flyers ruined them so badly. I keep saying that. Why would other teams spend years repairing a player when they can draft someone who hasn't had the offense slammed out of them in favor of "safety?"
Cogliano is a scrub. Put him on the Flyers last season and he'd look bad, not as bad as MacEwen, but still bad.Helm and Cogliano were useful players on a Cup winning team, which is why Colorado kept them. Obviously you have zero idea what a Cup winning roster looks like if you think they are equivalent to an actual scrub like MacEwen who would never get near a regular lineup spot on a team like the Avs.
Cogliano - 16 points in 64 regular season games, 6 points in 16 playoff games
Helm - 15 points in 68 regular season games, 5 points in 20 playoff games
MacEwen - 9 points in SEVENTY FIVE regular season games
Yeah but did they play with Makar?
Cogliano scored 15 points in 56 games on the San Jose Sharks, who only scored 2.57 goals per game. The Flyers scored 2.56 goals per game. If Fletcher had acquired him instead of Nate Thompson in free agency a year ago there would have been rejoicing, and the Flyers 4th line wouldn't have been the worst 4th line in the league.Cogliano is a scrub. Put him on the Flyers last season and he'd look bad, not as bad as MacEwen, but still bad.
He's still a scrub. Exactly the kind of player people around here like to whine about.Cogliano scored 15 points in 56 games on the San Jose Sharks, who only scored 2.57 goals per game. The Flyers scored 2.56 goals per game. If Fletcher had acquired him instead of Nate Thompson in free agency a year ago there would have been rejoicing, and the Flyers 4th line wouldn't have been the worst 4th line in the league.
Cogliano also would have helped the Flyers PK much more than Thompson did, and for only $200,000 more. That is where he has more value than NAK, as a very useful penalty killer. On the Sharks he averaged the most SH/TOI of any forward until he was traded, and they had the league's 4th= best Net PK%.
Preview/Lines #61: Penalty Kill Has Been Sharks’ “Backbone”
It’s probably bad luck to talk about how good the San Jose Sharks’ penalty kill has been with Cale Makar and Nathan MacKinnon coming into town. But the Sharks have given up just two power play goals since the All-Star break – even including yesterday’s Anze Kopitar strike. They’ve killed...sanjosehockeynow.com
It's equal parts amazing and embarrassing that you did not know that this "scrub" you keep talking about as if you know all about him, is actually one of the league's better penalty killers. If you had watched any of the Avs playoff games you would have surely noticed him and Helm out there more than any other Colorado forwards as they racked up a very solid Net PK% of 83.9. NAK didn't get a second of SH TOI. That's why they kept the old guys, so give that ignorant narrative a rest and move on to your next piece of clueless fan fiction.
Cogliano blows Thompson out of the water when it comes to the PK. Again, it's not gambling playing Cogliano on the PK. Gambling (or throwing money away) is the Deslaurier contract.He's still a scrub. Exactly the kind of player people around here like to whine about.
"Why are we adding some veteran who can't score and not playing a more skilled prospect?"
Yes, he'd be better than Thompson at 35, but he's what Thompson was at 32-34, we just got him past his expiration date.
Thompson was traded twice at the TDL in those years b/c of his value as a 4C/PK guy.
The Avs are taking the same chance with Cogliano that we took with Thompson, is there anything left?
Helm is a better bet to age like PEB.
The fact they'd rather gamble on Cogliano than teach NAK how to PK tells you all you need to know about NAK - because his physical skills should translate to an elite PK guy.
without a doubt.He's still a scrub. Exactly the kind of player people around here like to whine about.
"Why are we adding some veteran who can't score and not playing a more skilled prospect?"
Yes, he'd be better than Thompson at 35, but he's what Thompson was at 32-34, we just got him past his expiration date.
Thompson was traded twice at the TDL in those years b/c of his value as a 4C/PK guy.
The Avs are taking the same chance with Cogliano that we took with Thompson, is there anything left?
Helm is a better bet to age like PEB.
The fact they'd rather gamble on Cogliano than teach NAK how to PK tells you all you need to know about NAK - because his physical skills should translate to an elite PK guy.
People think of the Thompson who played on the Flyers, before he came here he was very similar to Cogliano, if he was as bad as people think he was, he wouldn't have started for 10 years in the NHL - for one thing, he doesn't fight.without a doubt.
Also Cogliano much much better than Nate.
Nate Thompson had no attributes on par with Cogliano's skating ability. A trait that will always play in this league.People think of the Thompson who played on the Flyers, before he came here he was very similar to Cogliano, if he was as bad as people think he was, he wouldn't have started for 10 years in the NHL - for one thing, he doesn't fight.
We just got him a year late.
People think of the Thompson who played on the Flyers, before he came here he was very similar to Cogliano, if he was as bad as people think he was, he wouldn't have started for 10 years in the NHL - for one thing, he doesn't fight.
We just got him a year late.
Cogliano is a plus skater and capable hockey player, even if he does not produce offense.
Thompson was signed only for being a voice in the locker room and as a role model for younger players.
Is it stupid to sign somebody for intangibles only? Yes, of course.