Doc5
Registered User
- Aug 8, 2012
- 2,709
- 3,623
With that run he just had, he just almost matched his last years ppg average despite that slow start. Didn’t Really think he’d be able to do it!
View attachment 510953
Suzuki has really improved his faceoffs.
Now at 49.1% on the season not counting today (13/16 on faceoffs so far)
The way he came back after his goal was disallowed with another snipe was badass. He just had Smith confused as hell. First snipe was low blocker, then comes back with the high glove. He’s like Bobby Fisher. Just a move ahead of his opponents.Those “impossible-weird-angled-passes” and that laser wrist shot are so lethal. Love watching this guy, have not felt this since Kovalev.
He is outpacing Ryan O'Reilly by a decent margin at the same point in his career. O'Reilly was also an a much better offensive oriented team. Good News.He’s on schedule to be a very rare player. True Centerman. PPG player. Elite defensively. Can play all situations.
He’s on schedule to be a very rare player. True Centerman. PPG player. Elite defensively. Can play all situations.
Kovalev?Potentially the best player since... who?
According to defensive WAR, Suzuki is a top 10 defensive forward in the league.Elite defensively? I'm a HUGE fan of Suzuki and I've been perpetuating he's a fine two-way player who can line up with the opponents' best, but a quick look at his NHL stats page shows he's an impressive -17 for the season and -37 career-wise.
On the surface, that's not a positive goal differential at even strength. Is he that good on the PP and the PK to rue out this mark?
Where are we getting all this elite defensively stuff? Is the +\- States that superfluous? Why bother even taking it into account on a Stat sheet?
He's moving his feet like never before, it really adds to his game.
Potentially the best player since... who?
Elite defensively? I'm a HUGE fan of Suzuki and I've been perpetuating he's a fine two-way player who can line up with the opponents' best, but a quick look at his NHL stats page shows he's an impressive -17 for the season and -37 career-wise.
On the surface, that's not a positive goal differential at even strength. Is he that good on the PP and the PK to rue out this mark?
Where are we getting all this elite defensively stuff? Is the +\- States that superfluous? Why bother even taking it into account on a Stat sheet?
That's the telling sign indeed. He is super strong on the puck when he's on.Suzuki is at his best when he plays with an edge. When he gets cocky or when he’s finishing his hits. For some reason, when i see Suzuki going into the corner and hitting guys and getting dirty, i know right away that’s he’s gonna play a good one!
Bergevin made a lot of moves in his ten year tenure and I can name a few better than giving Suzuki a blank cheque. Suzuki at 7.8m for 8 years is far too much cap hit and term, the only comparable is Nico Hirscher and that's not a good thing.If there is one thing MB did right its that he signed Suzuki to a long term deal.
In a couple of years we are going to be loving this deal.Bergevin made a lot of moves in his ten year tenure and I can name a few better than giving Suzuki a blank cheque. Suzuki at 7.8m for 8 years is far too much cap hit and term, the only comparable is Nico Hirscher and that's not a good thing.
I sure hope so. But it was clearly a gamble, and a bad one for a team that has over 20% of its cap to Weber and Price for the next four years... and another 20% to Armia, Gallagher, and Petry.In a couple of years we are going to be loving this deal.