LTCPain75
Registered User
- Jul 12, 2022
- 561
- 679
The same person told you a stork delivered you, right?I was told it was cheese
The same person told you a stork delivered you, right?I was told it was cheese
Wait….The same person told you a stork delivered you, right?
...and a migrant in a hotel.I was told it was cheese
And despite that in the 8 games he played he was more effective than anyone else on the team.Serious issues?
The guy is seemingly addicted to a party drug/partying, hence his little Seattle stunt last year.
Then you look at his Instagram photos and it's clear the guy likes to have a good time and prioritizes that over hockey.
Please explain to me how the league terminating his contract for addiction will punish the Avs as a cap hit.This is incorrect
Please show us where it says in the CBA that entering phase 4 = league terminating his contractPlease explain to me how the league terminating his contract for addiction will punish the Avs as a cap hit.
its pretty clearly written in the part of a league ban. You think they just fire your ass but then continue to pay you 6m+ per year just because?Please show us where it says in the CBA that entering phase 4 = league terminating his contract
Please show us the part in the CBA where it says that phase 4 = lifetime ban thenits pretty clearly written in the part of a lifetime ban. You think they just fire your ass but then continue to pay you 6m+ per year just because?
Stage 4 is not a ban. It is a 1 year suspension where reinstatement is not guaranteed. That does not mean outright ban or termination. If a player follows the program and is clean at the end, the NHLPA will fight for him to be reinstated and by the agreement, he should be.Please explain to me how the league terminating his contract for addiction will punish the Avs as a cap hit.
What could happen assuming he fails another test hasn’t happened in cap era and only happened once before with Brantt Myhres. It’s not comparable to the Mike Richards or Evander Kane situation (or Jake Dotchin etc) where the team terminated.
Is this a poem?This is sad.
Half of you are arguing CBA, the other debating ethics of drug use.
Nuke screwed the team.
Thrice.
I love the player.
I wish the addict well.
But I also want him off this team.
Full stop.
Nuke isn't an Av.
I don't care how.
He's gone.
Is this a poem?
If only crack was legal…And despite that in the 8 games he played he was more effective than anyone else on the team.
Would you rather have Nuke who may not show up depending on whether he gets his hands on some powder. Or Rantanen who you know won't show up. Or MacK who may or may not compete depending on if the other team decides to check him for two consecutive games.
Do we?So, w e know as long as Nuke is clean, he is guaranteed a chance to come back, which is why we have to have the cap space available to accommodate his removal from LTIR to active status. Things could turn out that the best option is to play him.
Not really… most are VERY lax. The NHL doesn’t care until the program. Many guys test positive for recreational drugs and it simply doesn’t matter or get addressed until they are in the PAP.Just something I am pondering: Are the drug rules in pro sports horribly outdated?
But if it is used as PED…Not really… most are VERY lax. The NHL doesn’t care until the program. Many guys test positive for recreational drugs and it simply doesn’t matter or get addressed until they are in the PAP.
But if it is used as PED…
Man, I know this is true. And I know the entertainment/hollywood business is probably even more relaxed. But it absolutely boggles my mind that an entire industry can be so cavalier about drug usage.The NHLPA specifically had cocaine carved out of the PED list. Many leagues around the world consider it a PED, but the NHL is not one of them. Players can hammer rails 5 minutes before games and it wouldn’t matter as a PED.
Wait until he finds out what happens at wall street officesMan, I know this is true. And I know the entertainment/hollywood business is probably even more relaxed. But it absolutely boggles my mind that an entire industry can be so cavalier about drug usage.