OMG67
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 12,028
- 7,801
Power skating clinic for Joe Scho; you might be stuck in the ‘70s. I can tell you at least as far back as 2005 that parents of 25 kids in an area with two AAA bantam (and minor midget I should add) programs were shelling out $5K a pop for professional training sessions, many of them two sessions in the off-season. That is in addition to 2 week hockey camp and a power skating clinic. A parent of a goalie might feel compelled to shell out an additional $5K for private coaching to keep up with Joe Schmo.
Parents dig deep so that one day the child might fulfill the parents dream.
And yeah, kids can be taught how to be winners. Keefe turned a floundering hounds team within 3 weeks, he had that team playing 0.667 by week 5 or 6. Erie dominated with Knaublach behind the bench, but not without. Richmond makes pros out of kids with about half the draft capital of the ‘67s. Almost all agents/parents want their kids in Hunter’s program. The ‘67s success is much more due to Tourigny & Cameron than all other factors combined imo.
Don’t get me wrong, I 100% agree that coaching is an integral part of it. I’ve made no bones about that repeatedly. My only point is that it isn’t the only part. You need kids that are receptive to your program and you need to provide them with the requisite support and training to couple with it otherwise it is just words. You can’t walk into a room half filled with players not capable of playing at this level and make then winners and feel like winners. It isn’t a Hollywood movie. You have to have something to start with.
A strong approach is to put jobs up for grabs and let the kids work for them. Let them earn their ice time. Kids that don’t buy into the program get the boot. My whole issue with Niagara was they didn’t do that. They made an immediate decision on the status of their team and in the offseason acquired a bunch of players and anointed them status by way of trade value to acquire. You don’t typically spend what Niagara spent only to now let them fight for jobs.
Poor leadership above the bench leads to poor leadership on the bench. That leadership above the bench has a significant impact on the ice. But you can’t be a leader barking orders either. The leadership above the bench has to put in the effort and demonstrate ability as well. That starts with access to an elite training and development program. I understand what you are saying about “some” Bantam “AAA” teams and players getting what those kids and parents consider elite training but here is a wide difference between what a Bantam team gets for $5k per player per year and what the NHL provides. OHL teams have the status and ability to provide at least close to what the NhL provides And much of it can be through Sponsorship opportunities etc. There are no Bantam teams working with mental coaches on an individual one on one basis. there are no Bantam teams working with players individually to help the individual player reach their peak potential. They join cookie cutter programs designed for the group.