NHLPA investigating FORMER Leafs GM Dubas' agent for possible violation

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Kyle was buddies with his agent in Uni. That's why he works with him in particular.

You're kidding yourselves if you think a "beneficial to all agreement" could not happen where; 2 agents who work at the same firm each repping 2 of the highest profile clients in hockey; employed by the same organization. oh, and by the way, one of those clients has immense influence over the other clients salary.

And now, all of the Dubas camps theatrics over his last week as GM kinda make sense.
 
Dubas doesn't have to worry. The lawyers at MLSE can drown this kind of nuisance in paper. Oh wait...

Seriously, if the guy negotiating the contract for Dubas isn't an actual registered agent with the PA and the league (I'm assuming he isn't, maybe he is) then I suppose no rules about agents applies here.

Even if that is the case Wasserman as an entity is involved. This would not matter if Dubas’s agent is employed as an independent agent and has no connection to Wasserman.
 
Kyle was buddies with his agent in Uni. That's why he works with him in particular.

You're kidding yourselves if you think a "beneficial to all agreement" could not happen where; 2 agents who work at the same firm each repping 2 of the highest profile clients in hockey; employed by the same organization. oh, and by the way, one of those clients has immense influence over the other clients salary.

And now, all of the Dubas camps theatrics over his last week as GM kinda make sense.
Yes you are correct, and anybody denying this just has their head in the sand. Unless that agency just really hates money.

I made some very calm and level-headed arguments in 2019 that the unprecedented dramatic overpayments stunk of something beyond mere incompetence and should be investigated.




Or like this one below. Very calm and level-headed. You have to click the links to see my post. Those words below aren't mine for some reason.


This is a good one too.

I'll give you full credit Waffles - you were trying to have discussions about this long before it was a thing.
 
If the Leafs had this knowledge on hand (which they would have considering they were literally negotiating with Dubas agent during his initial contract as well as the extension while also knowing who represented Matthews) it obviously wasn't a problem with them earlier otherwise Shanny wouldn't have had an extension offer earlier

If it was leaked by the Leafs it was probably to put a bit of rain on Dubas' parade
This Wasserman agent is new, he wasn't around during Dubas's initial contract. Shanahan said as much during the press conference. He asked Dubas who his agent was and Dubas said the agent would reach out to Shanahan, implying this agent is new. I don't think its crazy to assume Shanahan: a) did not know which agency this new agent Dubas had was from
b) in another vein may not have known which agency Matthew's agent was from even if he did know where Dubas's agent was as Dubas was the one negotiating not Shanahan with Matthew's agent. He probably knew Matthew's agents name and so on but agency is up for debate.

I think it's very possible Shanahan and the Leafs only found out about this once it came on the news post firing. With all the mud Dubas has been spreading about Shanahan it's possible he took this news and made a complaint to the NHLPA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PromisedLand
I don't see the incentive for the agency to do any shady deal with Dubas for Matthews. Matthews was going to get whatever he asked for whether that be through Dubas or through an offer sheet and it wouldn't have been particularly hard either.
 
The collective IQ on here continues to drop… it must be all the 5G towers. Things are getting embarrassing this off-season. Guess it’s time to avoid this place until we’re closer to the next season.
Probably best. :laugh:
 
Wasserman presents Dubas with x contract proposal from a Leaf player. Wasserman says accept the offer and we will make sure you get a split of commissions and we will also lower any fees you might incur or waive them when using our services. In addition lower demands in future player negotiations.

This is where I think it is problem. I am not saying this is what happening. But this scenario could happen.

The optics are just as important as the truth; Sometimes even more important.
So Wasserman is unethical?
 
Do really large agencies do this across groups? Wasserman has different groups for different sports. So, while I can see the hockey group having meetings like that, do you think they have meetings where the hockey group, the baseball group, the football group, the basketball group, the golf group all sit down together? Dubas is not represented by someone from the Wasserman hockey group. He is represented by someone listed as part of the golf group.
1685051484981.png


Apparently, according to the latest news Armstrong was involved with the NHL side as well. Not "formally" but assisted. This is getting very interesting.
 
One thing we can do for certain is get rid of the word "conspiracy" in regards to this.

There is no conspiracy here - Both Matthews and Dubas work with Wasserman - this is a fact.

The NHLPA isn't doing an investigation - more of an inquiry about the relationships between all the parties. This kind of thing is clearly allowed too - there's no rules anywhere saying that a GM and a player can't share the same agency.

What people wanna know is that when Dubas negotiated these contracts - was he doing it in the best interest of the Leafs or was he working with Wasserman to help them, himself and Auston more than helping the Leafs?

Two things about Kyle during his tenure here that make me question some things:

1. He was married to this core no matter what, defended them to the death every playoff failure.
2. The NMC's aligned directly with his own contract expiring. Mitch's specifically kicking in 2 years from free agency - unluckily aligning it directly beside Matthews'.
 
If Dubas accepts the proposal in the scenario I put forward both Wasserman and Dubas are acting Unethically.
If Dubas accepted it, I would agree. However, the scenario only includes the offer. A completely fictional ( at this point anyway) one.
 
This Wasserman agent is new, he wasn't around during Dubas's initial contract. Shanahan said as much during the press conference. He asked Dubas who his agent was and Dubas said the agent would reach out to Shanahan, implying this agent is new. I don't think its crazy to assume Shanahan: a) did not know which agency this new agent Dubas had was from
b) in another vein may not have known which agency Matthew's agent was from even if he did know where Dubas's agent was as Dubas was the one negotiating not Shanahan with Matthew's agent. He probably knew Matthew's agents name and so on but agency is up for debate.

I think it's very possible Shanahan and the Leafs only found out about this once it came on the news post firing. With all the mud Dubas has been spreading about Shanahan it's possible he took this news and made a complaint to the NHLPA.
You don’t think Shannahan knew who he was talking to for months getting a contract set up for offer to Kyle?
 
The collective IQ on here continues to drop… it must be all the 5G towers. Things are getting embarrassing this off-season. Guess it’s time to avoid this place until we’re closer to the next season.
I couldn't help noticing that you didn't actually explain in any way why this thread is embarrassing. And we all know you never will. You just used ridicule rhetoric in an effort to stifle this discussion. And that seems to have failed.
 
I don't see the incentive for the agency to do any shady deal with Dubas for Matthews. Matthews was going to get whatever he asked for whether that be through Dubas or through an offer sheet and it wouldn't have been particularly hard either.

Perhaps, the commission structure is such that the agency earns more as the AAV increases.

All it is needed is for the guy at MLSE who makes the contact decisions agree by giving a cut of the additional commissions.

In addition the relationship is solidified long term for future negotiations.
 
If Dubas accepted it, I would agree. However, the scenario only includes the offer. A completely fictional ( at this point anyway) one.

It was meant to be hypothetical to illustrate how a conflict of interest might arise. I did not want to state Dubas would accept it. But I think it was a given in the scenario I put forward.
Bottom line the optics of this are not good all involved.
 
You don’t think Shannahan knew who he was talking to for months getting a contract set up for offer to Kyle?
Where in what I said did you get that takeaway? He knew he was talking to a guy named Armstrong. Did he know he was from Wasserman? Not necessarily.
 
There are also potential tertiary complications. Dubas is a certified player agent - there is nothing to preclude a potential incestuous relationship where it is promised to Dubas (in not so many words) that there's a job for him at the agency if the GM career doesn't pan out at his next stop.

This happens all the time in gov't with lobbyists and elected officials.

A partner of one of the biggest agencies in hockey (which he very likely still has a significant ownership stake in) is running the Habs and you’re writing conspiracy theories about a guy who was an agent for like a week a decade ago lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad