Canadian Finn
Oskee Wee Wee
you can fool some people some times, but you can't fool all the people all the time..Dubas house a crumbling down - Ya can only fool em so long .
you can fool some people some times, but you can't fool all the people all the time..Dubas house a crumbling down - Ya can only fool em so long .
Dubas doesn't have to worry. The lawyers at MLSE can drown this kind of nuisance in paper. Oh wait...
Seriously, if the guy negotiating the contract for Dubas isn't an actual registered agent with the PA and the league (I'm assuming he isn't, maybe he is) then I suppose no rules about agents applies here.
Yes you are correct, and anybody denying this just has their head in the sand. Unless that agency just really hates money.Kyle was buddies with his agent in Uni. That's why he works with him in particular.
You're kidding yourselves if you think a "beneficial to all agreement" could not happen where; 2 agents who work at the same firm each repping 2 of the highest profile clients in hockey; employed by the same organization. oh, and by the way, one of those clients has immense influence over the other clients salary.
And now, all of the Dubas camps theatrics over his last week as GM kinda make sense.
I'll give you full credit Waffles - you were trying to have discussions about this long before it was a thing.I made some very calm and level-headed arguments in 2019 that the unprecedented dramatic overpayments stunk of something beyond mere incompetence and should be investigated.
Or like this one below. Very calm and level-headed. You have to click the links to see my post. Those words below aren't mine for some reason.
Kyle Dubas appreciation / hot seat discussion ***Mod warning in OP***
Dubas is an idiot. But the damage is done and the only thing we can hope for is he'll be fired within the next 2-3 years and let a real GM handle the next wave of contracts.forums.hfboards.com
This is a good one too.
Friedman: - Leafs do not see Marner making more than Kane
$72M was discussion point prior to season for Marner, Maple Leafs - Sportsnet.ca “The discussion point was around $72 million prior to the season and my understanding is it was too rich for the Toronto Maple Leafs.” Yeh zero chance Marner signs for 8 years at 9 million......zero chance. Max...forums.hfboards.com
This Wasserman agent is new, he wasn't around during Dubas's initial contract. Shanahan said as much during the press conference. He asked Dubas who his agent was and Dubas said the agent would reach out to Shanahan, implying this agent is new. I don't think its crazy to assume Shanahan: a) did not know which agency this new agent Dubas had was fromIf the Leafs had this knowledge on hand (which they would have considering they were literally negotiating with Dubas agent during his initial contract as well as the extension while also knowing who represented Matthews) it obviously wasn't a problem with them earlier otherwise Shanny wouldn't have had an extension offer earlier
If it was leaked by the Leafs it was probably to put a bit of rain on Dubas' parade
Probably best.The collective IQ on here continues to drop… it must be all the 5G towers. Things are getting embarrassing this off-season. Guess it’s time to avoid this place until we’re closer to the next season.
So Wasserman is unethical?Wasserman presents Dubas with x contract proposal from a Leaf player. Wasserman says accept the offer and we will make sure you get a split of commissions and we will also lower any fees you might incur or waive them when using our services. In addition lower demands in future player negotiations.
This is where I think it is problem. I am not saying this is what happening. But this scenario could happen.
The optics are just as important as the truth; Sometimes even more important.
Do really large agencies do this across groups? Wasserman has different groups for different sports. So, while I can see the hockey group having meetings like that, do you think they have meetings where the hockey group, the baseball group, the football group, the basketball group, the golf group all sit down together? Dubas is not represented by someone from the Wasserman hockey group. He is represented by someone listed as part of the golf group.
who is on the other phone?
So Wasserman is unethical?
Then go flip on CBC or something.The collective IQ on here continues to drop… it must be all the 5G towers. Things are getting embarrassing this off-season. Guess it’s time to avoid this place until we’re closer to the next season.
If Dubas accepted it, I would agree. However, the scenario only includes the offer. A completely fictional ( at this point anyway) one.If Dubas accepts the proposal in the scenario I put forward both Wasserman and Dubas are acting Unethically.
George Soroswho is on the other phone?
You don’t think Shannahan knew who he was talking to for months getting a contract set up for offer to Kyle?This Wasserman agent is new, he wasn't around during Dubas's initial contract. Shanahan said as much during the press conference. He asked Dubas who his agent was and Dubas said the agent would reach out to Shanahan, implying this agent is new. I don't think its crazy to assume Shanahan: a) did not know which agency this new agent Dubas had was from
b) in another vein may not have known which agency Matthew's agent was from even if he did know where Dubas's agent was as Dubas was the one negotiating not Shanahan with Matthew's agent. He probably knew Matthew's agents name and so on but agency is up for debate.
I think it's very possible Shanahan and the Leafs only found out about this once it came on the news post firing. With all the mud Dubas has been spreading about Shanahan it's possible he took this news and made a complaint to the NHLPA.
I couldn't help noticing that you didn't actually explain in any way why this thread is embarrassing. And we all know you never will. You just used ridicule rhetoric in an effort to stifle this discussion. And that seems to have failed.The collective IQ on here continues to drop… it must be all the 5G towers. Things are getting embarrassing this off-season. Guess it’s time to avoid this place until we’re closer to the next season.
It's a common logical fallacy that most simpler folks use. Not much to pay attention to.I couldn't help noticing that you didn't actually explain in any way why this thread is embarrassing. And we all know you never will. You just used ridicule rhetoric in an effort to stifle this discussion. And that seems to have failed.
I don't see the incentive for the agency to do any shady deal with Dubas for Matthews. Matthews was going to get whatever he asked for whether that be through Dubas or through an offer sheet and it wouldn't have been particularly hard either.
If Dubas accepted it, I would agree. However, the scenario only includes the offer. A completely fictional ( at this point anyway) one.
Yeah, I was pretty surprised when I heard that Dubas' agent shares the same agency as Matthews. That seemed fraught with complications.
Where in what I said did you get that takeaway? He knew he was talking to a guy named Armstrong. Did he know he was from Wasserman? Not necessarily.You don’t think Shannahan knew who he was talking to for months getting a contract set up for offer to Kyle?
For all of Wasserman? Just Armstrong? Who?It was meant to be hypothetical to illustrate how a conflict of interest might arise.
Bottom line the optics of this are not good all involved.
There are also potential tertiary complications. Dubas is a certified player agent - there is nothing to preclude a potential incestuous relationship where it is promised to Dubas (in not so many words) that there's a job for him at the agency if the GM career doesn't pan out at his next stop.
This happens all the time in gov't with lobbyists and elected officials.
For all of Wasserman? Just Armstrong? Who?