Ted Hoffman
Done
- Dec 15, 2002
- 29,289
- 8,727
Yeah, and if we only make it "best-on-best" scoring will skyrocket. Maybe make rinks 200x100, so everyone has more room to work with, too.My God, have you watched the quality of play of some of the teams now? Water the product down more and it will become unwatchable...
What could go wrong?
I mean, if one is in the pro-Canada, BETTMAN HATES OUR f***ING GUTS AND WANTS ALL 32 TEAMS IN THE U.S. camp, then yes - one should absolutely be pulling for a team in a "clearly failed" hockey market since that's the easiest route to end up with a team in Canada.so in 10 years will this team be relocating to Quebec City or Hamilton?
Every time we talk about adding/relocating teams, geography becomes the biggest impediment. "Well, we can't have a team in _____ because that screws up geography, we'd have to add a team in _______ to balance." Or, "if ____ moves to ___________ then someone has to move back over to keep things in balance."If relocation, the 'Yotes are actually a promising team but that reignites the east/west balance issue.
That's why I have long advocated for, and will continue to advocate for, divisions that span the entire continent without regard to geography. Then, if/when we need to add/relocate teams, geography is entirely out of the list of things that need to be accounted for.