I wasn't trying to be sympathetic, and the only speculation I was controlling was my own. Your morality policing doesn't move me.
If some facts turn up and they're sad, I'll have all the sympathy for him that I can muster. I'm not into schadenfreude, and have said since he was traded that I hope things work out for him. I still feel that way.
A thought occurred to me and I shared it. You misread it, chastised me for being wrong, reread it once your error was pointed out to you, then chastised me for being mean. I'm sorry that my stating some facts to cite current similarities offended your sensibilities.
If you personally don't want to speculate, don't. But you're burning a lot of calories pointing out that it could be anything else; that it need not be any of these terrible or mean things. He might just be sleepy. And you're right. He might be. That would be nice. That's all speculative, mind you, but I guess I made you do it, so shame on me.
However, your insistence that everyone else throw out their own reason and etiquette and use yours instead is a little presumptuous. I stand by what I said. Sorry if it bugs you.