Melvin
21/12/05
Here comes the 4th that we traded to Chicago for Bowey and a 5th.
All these stupid little trades. I didn't even remember that one.
All these stupid little trades. I didn't even remember that one.
Here comes the 4th that we traded to Chicago for Bowey and a 5th.
All these stupid little trades. I didn't even remember that one.
off the top of my headSuch as?
What the f*** was even the point of that trade?
What the f*** was even the point of that trade?
Exposure requirements for Seattle? I don't even know.
Will be frustrating if Stankoven is still available at that spot.
Stankoven went in the mid 2ndExposure requirements for Seattle? I don't even know.
Will be frustrating if Stankoven is still available at that spot.
Here comes the 4th that we traded to Chicago for Bowey and a 5th.
All these stupid little trades. I didn't even remember that one.
the Flames just took a dude named Whynot. That is amazing.
And even if he had been selected then they could have used that cap space for at worst the same quality defender. That's being really kind.We had to waste a pick to get a defender to expose because they stupidly didn’t want to expose Tyler Myers and his terrible contract that would never have been selected.
off the top of my head
in terms of promoting high end f/d/g over same time(not the current prospects with "potential"):
better than: cal, , sj, arz, buf, wpg, edm, nsh, stl, pits, wsh, la, det, vegas, *(obv bit different with them joining same year boeser played 1st season but they had a large amount of picks)
equalish: dal, chi, ana, tor, fla
worse than: tb, carolina, nyr,
And what are the 8 "high end" players the Canucks promoted? You're already counting Pod as "high end" before he plays a single game? If so, you have to do the same for those other teams that have a likely addition for next year.
For the Canucks it's Hoglander, Hughes, Pettersson, Demko...? who else in the past 4 years + next year?
The Canucks *already* have just one pick in the top-100 in the 2022 draft. And the odds of Benning adding any is basically zero.
For Nate Schmidt.
So I was replying to a person and said if they are considering podz and rathbone as roster players id consider it 8(should be 7, 8 was from a comment with someone else over something else, sorry). If you dont consider them you have Boeser in 17-18, pettersson in 18-19, Hughes 19-20. Demko+ Hoglander(who eclipsed what i thought would be a 3rd liner) in 20-21. Thats a 1c, top pairing d, 1w, 2w, and a high end 1g. I havent seen many teams be able to promote that many high end players in the last 5 years.And what are the 8 "high end" players the Canucks promoted? You're already counting Pod as "high end" before he plays a single game? If so, you have to do the same for those other teams that have a likely addition for next year.
For the Canucks it's Hoglander, Hughes, Pettersson, Demko...? who else in the past 4 years + next year?
We're having the usual voices chime in about trading picks (Miller deal, Dickinson deal, OEL deal, etc etc etc.) in the same way:
"most picks bust"
"Prospects can't help the team for 3-4 years"
The problem with this is that if you think this way 3-4 years ago....you wont have anyone coming up ready to push for the team today.
Same people love to crow on about how much our drafting has improved, but they just simply seldom use the draft picks for some reason. And it's strange how few players have made an impact. We're at well under 1 legit NHL player per draft.
And every year we are told it is no big deal, ran out of time, can't just manufacture trades, wait until next year, blah blah blah. It isn't a one-off. It's a trend.This lack of picks comes directly from mismanagement of assets. It's little things. For example, not moving players in their last seasons at the deadline when you're obviously not winning a cup and they won't be re-signing. You can go back through all the years even to Hamhuis. It all adds up.