Again, how is shooting hard at any point when the puck is legally in play being a clown? Even if this was the literal first time this has ever happened in the history of the NHL, being upset over it is wholly irrational and comes off as someone just looking for a reason to be upset. And if it was the first time it ever happened, then how is there an unwritten rule against it whereby it’s justified to cross check someone in the face or claim that it is an intrinsically memorable thing?
I mean hell, this is a sport where it is totally acceptable for a pissed off defender to show his disdain for an allowed goal by clumsily slapshotting it out of the net back down ice. That’s okay and this isn’t? C’mon…