He will be a stealLate 1st to mid 2nd.
We won't be selecting him.
He will be a stealLate 1st to mid 2nd.
We won't be selecting him.
I don't think Gorton could do 20 to save his life.wonder if any players put a 20 dollar bill on the table when that happens
By the time it is revealed which players were hits and which were misses, Matheson will be irrelevant to the NHL. I'd rather get two shots at picking up one of the relevant hits than one.Of those top 14, there are only going to be 4-6 hits. 3-5 hits from 13 players if you take Celebrini away because we can't draft him.
I was looking at the 2018 draft last night which was fairly deep in the top 13 or top 14 as well. There are 4-6 hits. Dahlin, Svechnikov, Tkachuk, Hughes, Bouchard, Dobson. Islanders had the 11 and 12 picks and missed with Wahlstrom but hit with Dobson.
I would want an extra pick as well but the thing I ponder is how many hits will there be in this draft. Another 4-6? or more? If there are more, that is an anomaly.
What does him getting injured in the semi final of the playoffs has to do with not being taken by the habs?Sennecke not available for testing really dampens me taking him. Too many good players available to take risk like that
Of those top 14, there are only going to be 4-6 hits. 3-5 hits from 13 players if you take Celebrini away because we can't draft him.
I was looking at the 2018 draft last night which was fairly deep in the top 13 or top 14 as well. There are 4-6 hits. Dahlin, Svechnikov, Tkachuk, Hughes, Bouchard, Dobson. Islanders had the 11 and 12 picks and missed with Wahlstrom but hit with Dobson.
I would want an extra pick as well but the thing I ponder is how many hits will there be in this draft. Another 4-6? or more? If there are more, that is an anomaly.
No way we can reach to take Sennecke 5th. It would be a KK type reach. Only way we can draft Sennecke is to get another pick from 10-14 range.
Not a reach.No way we can reach to take Sennecke 5th. It would be a KK type reach. Only way we can draft Sennecke is to get another pick from 10-14 range.
Kotkaniemi was ranked 5th in McKenzie's final ranking, he wasn't really a draft reachNo way we can reach to take Sennecke 5th. It would be a KK type reach. Only way we can draft Sennecke is to get another pick from 10-14 range.
And then you go to 2016 and there's 8 hits in the top14. 9 in 2017. 11 in 2015.
You can't decisively say only 4-6 of the top14 will hit.
Kotkaniemi was ranked 5th in McKenzie's final ranking, he wasn't really a draft reach
Kotkaniemi surges into top five of TSN Draft Ranking - TSN.ca
Finn’s strong performance at the World Under-18 Championships in April has some scouts believing he’s a potential future No. 1 centre, Bob McKenzie writes. His late push could make the top 10 of the draft more unpredictable than originally anticipated.www.tsn.ca
There's no such thing as a reach. There's just good and bad picks.Of those top 14, there are only going to be 4-6 hits. 3-5 hits from 13 players if you take Celebrini away because we can't draft him.
I was looking at the 2018 draft last night which was fairly deep in the top 13 or top 14 as well. There are 4-6 hits. Dahlin, Svechnikov, Tkachuk, Hughes, Bouchard, Dobson. Islanders had the 11 and 12 picks and missed with Wahlstrom but hit with Dobson.
I would want an extra pick as well but the thing I ponder is how many hits will there be in this draft. Another 4-6? or more? If there are more, that is an anomaly.
No way we can reach to take Sennecke 5th. It would be a KK type reach. Only way we can draft Sennecke is to get another pick from 10-14 range.
There's no such thing as a reach. There's just good and bad picks.
You said it yourself, some of the top picks will be bad picks, and yet they are rated high on consensus rankings. So those rankings are flawed.
Thus picking outside of the consensus is not necessarily a bad thing.
KK was just a bad pick.
They could've picked Zadina and it would've been a bad pick even if he was rated high.
They could've picked Dobson and it would've been a good pick even if some would have said at the time that he was a reach.
That's one list.Kotkaniemi was ranked 5th in McKenzie's final ranking, he wasn't really a draft reach
Kotkaniemi surges into top five of TSN Draft Ranking - TSN.ca
Finn’s strong performance at the World Under-18 Championships in April has some scouts believing he’s a potential future No. 1 centre, Bob McKenzie writes. His late push could make the top 10 of the draft more unpredictable than originally anticipated.www.tsn.ca
where did you see this?Sennecke not available for testing really dampens me taking him. Too many good players available to take risk like that
And in return his scouts gave him Andersson, Kravtsov and KakkoNot a decisive statement though. It's going on probability. I remember watching a video right after we hired Gorton. He was talking to his Rangers scouts and said... "Come on guys, They won't all turn into what the ceilings projection says. It can't be. There is not that much talent that comes from each draft, you need to tell me who the can't miss guys are"
Will there be 4-6 or 6+ hits in this draft? When I talk hits, I'm talking about legit top pairing or top line forward talents. I'm sure there are plenty of top 6F and top 4D in this top 13 though.
My money would be put on 4-6 real hits. Top paring or top line forward talent. I see an equal chance of the guys on D turning into top pairing as it is with the forwards.
My BPA's at 5 are one of Dickinson, Demidov, Iggy, Lindstrom. I think Dickinson gets taken before us but not sure with Demidov. Call me crazy but I'm seriously considering Iggy over Demidov (if he slips).
And in return his scouts gave him Andersson, Kravtsov and Kakko
It's the most accurate list that gets put out there.That's one list.
2018 NHL Draft Final Consensus Rankings - The Hockey Writers NHL Entry Draft Latest News, Analysis & More
The final edition of the 2018 NHL Draft Consensus Rankings, averaging out the rankings from six major NHL Draft evaluators.thehockeywriters.com
Maybe they put too much weight on the position that he played but ultimately, it was just bad evaluation.You can reach in the BPA narrative but then the BPA can be different from each teams board. We reached because KK's resume was solely based on his U18's where his Liiga numbers were not that impressive at all. There are flaws with taking KK because his resume had holes. For this reason, it was a reach IMO. Thinking he will improve skating and fill into his frame and become a monster center like Barkov or Kopitar. That's a reach for me.
Good picks can disappoint you yes but we got to take the guy with the most impressive resume. If the guy disappoints but his resume was very good, not much you can do about that. It's difficult to project the players hunger to improve from age 17/18+
I believe it's tomorrow.@ME when the measurements are out plz
agreed.Again, can we have a thread about actual combine info and not people talking the same shit they have in other threads ? Would be f***ing amazing
good then we can have combine updates and not trade talk and suchI believe it's tomorrow.
Weird that it's not the first thing they do lol.I believe it's tomorrow.
Edit. looks like it will be Saturday.
Molson didn't hire him to be a scout, obviously.That video was in the 2020 draft. They traded up to get Schneider. Do I think Gorton is great at scouting? NO. I do think he has good team building skills though and he has to trust his scouts.
Anderson and Kravtsov were top 10 misses. Kakko was a BPA pick. Can't blame them for that.
I thought it was the same day as the medical. We will see tomorrow.Weird that it's not the first thing they do lol.