yes. we just can't get too excited if only 1 moves up because they might've won the 2OA drawingMaybe I'm dumb, but if during the lotto one of the 12-16 teams move up that means we're assured either 1 or 2 overall right?
yes. we just can't get too excited if only 1 moves up because they might've won the 2OA drawingMaybe I'm dumb, but if during the lotto one of the 12-16 teams move up that means we're assured either 1 or 2 overall right?
The chance they get #2 instead of #1 is significantly lower. Basically 0.1% or lower any of these teams gets #2. So if they win a pick its extremely likely we get #1yes. we just can't get too excited if only 1 moves up because they might've won the 2OA drawing
Yes. This is what we want.Maybe I'm dumb, but if during the lotto one of the 12-16 teams move up that means we're assured either 1 or 2 overall right?
Yes. This is what we want.
Correct. And if the 12-16 teams stay the same, we essentially drop down to an 18.5% chance at #1.So if one of the 12-16 teams moves up during the broadcast, we will know right away that we got at least 2nd OA, correct? Trying to figure out the new rules.
So if one of the 12-16 teams moves up during the broadcast, we will know right away that we got at least 2nd OA, correct? Trying to figure out the new rules.
Took me a moment, but I think that’s a misinterpretation of the graphic in the OP. The 0.1% for the later pick - I think- is because it would require an even more lowly seeded team to win the first drawing and get locked in. The higher odds (like 5% for OTT to pick 2nd) is IMO already the aggregate of them a) winning the 1st draw and b) them winning the 2nd draw after the Ducks win the 1st draw. If we had the isolated odds, I’d have to think their odds for the 2nd draw would be better (or at least close) to the odds to win the 1st draw. Sorry for not making this more intelligible lolThe chance they get #2 instead of #1 is significantly lower. Basically 0.1% or lower any of these teams gets #2. So if they win a pick its extremely likely we get #1
As far as the player goes, I don’t think a drop is that huge. Bedard probably becomes a 120 point player or so, possibly more, and the next few guys probably around 90-100. So points wise I don’t think the difference will be crazy, and the others have a more rounded game. One of the big reasons I really want Bedard though is so people can finally start f***ing paying attention to us. He’d generate so much buzz around our franchiseObviously no way to really know, but what are all of your opinions on the gap between 1st overall and 2nd/3rd in terms of what it would mean for us?
I'm seeing a lot of people rationalize the apparent inevitable drop in draft order, but I wonder how much eventual anguish it really warrants.
Yeah in hindsight that didn't really make sense as a response to you specifically. Just in general. Today's a good day, only thing we don't know is if it's a great day.
Yeah, exactly.As far as the player goes, I don’t think a drop is that huge. Bedard probably becomes a 120 point player or so, possibly more, and the next few guys probably around 90-100. So points wise I don’t think the difference will be crazy, and the others have a more rounded game. One of the big reasons I really want Bedard though is so people can finally start f***ing paying attention to us. He’d generate so much buzz around our franchise
yeah basically we're not out of the woods if that happens. the only way we're out of the woods is if two teams in 12-16 move up.Took me a moment, but I think that’s a misinterpretation of the graphic in the OP. The 0.1% for the later pick - I think- is because it would require an even more lowly seeded team to win the first drawing and get locked in. The higher odds (like 5% for OTT to pick 2nd) is IMO already the aggregate of them a) winning the 1st draw and b) them winning the 2nd draw after the Ducks win the 1st draw. If we had the isolated odds, I’d have to think their odds for the 2nd draw would be better (or at least close) to the odds to win the 1st draw. Sorry for not making this more intelligible lol
Yeah, exactly.
No one player is going to change that much obviously. Look at McDavid for example, he's been basically the best player in the league since his second season in 2016 and the Oilers haven't made a SCF appearance. Hell, they basically have the top two forwards in the NHL and same issue. They didn't even make the playoffs in four of McDavid's first five years in the league.
Even if Bedard turns into McDavid, we need help pretty much everywhere.
That's when the camera cuts back to evil Gary who then says, "There's been a challenge! We're going to Toronto for a replay on the drawing! Somebody may have misread the numbers!"It would be so damn hilarious (and cool) if they started going through the picks and the very first two went out of order. Weeks of anticipation, surely a long TV buildup to a dramatic reveal, and then have it over in the first potential moment
If I don't run the scenarios on Tankathon then they're going to run in my head. At least this way I have an external source to be mad at. Worrying about things completely out of my control is what I do best.People need to stop running the Tankathon simulator. You are putting yourself on an emotional rollercoaster. I just gave my co-worker the piss off look as the Ducks dropped 4 times in a row.