JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK
Twenty f*ckin years
- Oct 8, 2010
- 80,090
- 17,746
Brooks mentioned it a while ago that MSL may be a dark horse for an assistant coaching jobSaw over on reddit that the guys on Hockey Central think the Rangers are waiting for Keefe and that Marty St. Louis could be part of the staff next season as well...didn't hear it myself so I can't substantiate it more than that. Interesting to hear MSL's name though.
Saw over on reddit that the guys on Hockey Central think the Rangers are waiting for Keefe and that Marty St. Louis could be part of the staff next season as well...didn't hear it myself so I can't substantiate it more than that. Interesting to hear MSL's name though.
There was competition, and he went to the stars.The Rangers are the only team without a coach, makes perfect sense to me to take as much time as they want with this. No competition, and they really need to get a coach who can at least help young players grow. I’m glad they’re waiting to talk to everyone and anyone they can
Sounds like he didn’t want to come to the Rangers anyway, and who knows if he was even close to being at the top of their list, all we know if they were impressed with his interviewThere was competition, and he went to the stars.
There was competition, and he went to the stars.
You are comical.
There was competition, and he went to the stars.
There is always pressure with an Original Six franchise, yet alone the New York market added. This city is certainly not built for many people.Alleged competition.
Some coaches might not want to touch this with a 10 foot pole.
There is always pressure with an Original Six franchise, yet alone the New York market added. This city is certainly not built for many people.
They probably don’t give a rats ass about the original 6 unless one of them are contenders. We won’t be for a bit.
Just wait until we sign Kovalchuk and van Riemsdyk![]()
The negativity out of you is unbearable. Youre the type of fan that even when they are winning you find something to complain about. You got it all figured out at all times.I said contender.
Very good read, I recommend everyone to read it:
'I think I've had enough': Inside ex-Stars coach Ken Hitchcock's decision to retire and take consultant role
Some excerpts......“The biggest difference is that when I started [in the NHL] in the ‘90s and 2000s, it was all about preparation. Now it’s all about post-game review and keeping the train on the tracks," he said. “You could afford a bad two weeks back then. Not now. Too many good teams. It’s all about that review and keeping that train moving."...............Hitchcock said the biggest challenge for the new coach is connecting with the leaders of the team, not so much interacting with the entire team. “It’s the partnership you forge between the leaders and you that dictates your success level here," he said. “The reason you need that partnership is you don’t spend a lot of time on a casual basis with players in the NHL. There’s too many games, too few practices. It’s not like college or juniors."................ “The players spend all the time together. And it’s the leaders that set the tone with the entire team."
I think Hitch provides very valuable insight as to what should be demanded from a coach:
*Its like he says, you cannot derail for even a couple of weeks. I think many think in the lines of 'could it possibly we worse if the coach tried X' or 'why not give it a shot with this kid on the 1st line' and stuff like that. Sure a coach must try new things and take some gambles -- but there is no room for error. You must definitely err on the side of caution so to speak. All lines, all D pairings, PP, PK -- it can't be perfect but the fundamentals must be there. Its easy to sit on the sideline and have one million suggestions on what should be done and tried and tested and what not, but to get into the POs nowadays you -- MUST -- come together from the start of Camp and keep it together for the duration of the season.
*We discuss back and forth how much hands on a coach is. There is a notion that a coach must draw up the boundaries and detail manage everything. But like Hitch says its pretty much an illusion. A coach cannot steer his team with a firm hand. Its like this: On one side you have the numbers of hours per season were how the player acts will impact his performance on the ice, and on the other side you have the number of hours its possible for the coach to watch and steer his players. If its 16 hours per day on the first side, the coach is maybe there for 45 minutes of those 16 hours. Each and every player is his own coach today.
The only way to have well coached players is to have a great group of players and great leaders on the team.
The negativity out of you is unbearable. Youre the type of fan that even when they are winning you find something to complain about. You got it all figured out at all times.
Cant wait for next season to come already when reading the constant *****ing in the offseason
JVR isn’t happening.Just wait until we sign Kovalchuk and van Riemsdyk![]()
Joe Sacco would be a huge disappointment imoI thought it would be Quinn. I thought right, but Quinn's family will keep him in Boston. Not meant to be.
I don't believe it's Keefe. No inside info this time, just my gut. Don't believe he's the guy.
Waiting for a dark horse to emerge, a la Joe Sacco.
This is overcomplicating things a lot.I like how Marc Savard said something about Keefe. Made me laugh. Did Savard have a telepathic implant inserted in his cerebral cortex while he was a member of the Rangers like 20 years ago? What insider info if any would he have and does he have any connections left to a team that he had a slightly nasty divorce with?
Interesting comments by Montgomery about why he chose Dallas. I don't think the original 6s or the big markets have a clear cut advantage as they used to 20-30 years ago. Especially in the Facetime/Skype/Social Media era. Before you could use NY or Philly or Montreal to market yourself for life. It's slightly different now.