Leetch3
Registered User
- Jul 14, 2009
- 13,001
- 10,863
I guess I'd like the Canes to "take credit" for player development, but other than leaving guys ripen in the NCAA, they didn't do much development of their D.
Slavin played only 14 AHL games after leaving college. Pesce played on 7 AHL games after leaving college. Faulk came right to the NHL after college but was sent to the AHL for 12 games mid season when he struggled but came back up. Hanifin came straight to the NHL from college. Hamilton and TVR were traded for, CDH was a UFA signing. I think they are doing a much better job now with guys like McKeown, Bean, and even Fleury.
For me, defensemen have to have elite decision making abilities to be really successful. Make the right play at the right moment. There's an article about the Canes scouting Slavin where Bert Marshall said he watch Slavin a number of times on a bad team and Slavin would end up -3, but he marveled that he always made the right decision. Fox I think has that. Interestingly enough, that was a complaint many Canes fans had with Hanifin. Made the wrong decisions at the wrong times and probably why the team moved on from him so early.
When you combine that decision making ability with size and skating and/or some other skill (like a great shot or playmaking ability), it's a great combination for today's NHL.
all good points but while it seems odd to give a team credit for letting a player develop somewhere else, I think that is actually a big part of development. knowing which players to leave where they are and which players need to be in different situations or in the pros/ahl is hugely important.