Redskins let the better version walk and traded for the downgraded model lol….that will never qualify as a good trade for me.
It’s getting chippy. Good.
But you’ve always loved Cousins a LOT more than I did. His track record in Minnesota hasn’t exactly let me down either. I expected him to rack up stats and be a .500 QB. Which is pretty much what’s happened.
And you've always tapdanced on Cousins being a choker, which is bullshit. The Redskins team around him was unremarkable at best and he is FAR from the reason Minnesota hasn't won. Cousins has, overall, played pretty damn well in the types of games he gets blamed for choking in.
McAfee's show illustrated part of this really well a few days ago...
He gets blamed for stuff that isn't on him, and certainly isn't only on him. Calling him a choker or a "can't win the big game" guy is the same horseshit they threw at Marino and Elway for years and years. Sometimes you've got an elite QB carrying your team so far on his back that you lose sight of the fact that it's damn near impossible for him to take you the whole way by himself.
Now I'm not saying that Cousins is Elway or Marino, but what I do like about him very much in this situation is that he just takes the blame. He owns it without any real pushback because that's what leaders do. He's a pretty great QB and an exceptional character guy and leader.
And we let him go because he asked for a deal that would have been an absolute steal in 2 years, and countered with offers that were just plain insulting.
I'm over it, but the revisionist history and continued skewed perspective on Cousins is pretty silly. I'm just glad that (hopefully) the clown show is over in DC and maybe we can attract better players now that the wicked witch is dead.
10-40 against teams w a winning record. 2 franchises.
Also — a large part of Minnesota’s problems are that they *cannot* put a better team around him (especially the defense) because he costs Too Much Damn Money for his worth to the team.
My problem w KC was always that. “Not enough bang for the buck”. It’s what I’ve always felt. And it’s gotten worse as he’s many almost what…40m a year now or something?
But you are right sir, this is a topic I shouldn’t be pushing (Altho Mr Hog is the one that generally brings it up )
No arguments thereWell they could have had him for extremely few bucks, and he'd have wildly outperformed his cap hit. But Allen and Snyder could give a Fletcher/Milbury management duo a run for their money as worst ever.
Nah, there wasn't a world where Kirk was re-signing in Washington for any dollar amount.Well they could have had him for extremely few bucks, and he'd have wildly outperformed his cap hit. But Allen and Snyder could give a Fletcher/Milbury management duo a run for their money as worst ever.
Nah, there wasn't a world where Kirk was re-signing in Washington for any dollar amount.
He literally thought getting drafted here was a test of faith from God. He was mad we dared draft Griffin, or give him a shot, before him.
He gone.
Well saidHaving Kirk and Trent would make this team a legitimate contender I think. Of course, if they had Kirk and Trent they wouldn’t have other players on the roster that they do have since a lot of money would be tied up to those two guys. Really, who knows what the roster looks like in an alternate reality where Danny and Bruce aren’t total dickheads and they don’t drive out high performers. Driving them out and continuing to trot out a shitty product didn’t hurt the effort to get Danny to sell so if losing KC and TW was just another drop in the bucket that eventually overflowed and drowned Danny then I’m fine with that trade off.
Having Kirk and Trent would make this team a legitimate contender I think. Of course, if they had Kirk and Trent they wouldn’t have other players on the roster that they do have since a lot of money would be tied up to those two guys. Really, who knows what the roster looks like in an alternate reality where Danny and Bruce aren’t total dickheads and they don’t drive out high performers. Driving them out and continuing to trot out a shitty product didn’t hurt the effort to get Danny to sell so if losing KC and TW was just another drop in the bucket that eventually overflowed and drowned Danny then I’m fine with that trade off.
Gonna need Sam to do the same then….Is it just me or is dotson about to have a breakout year
I don’t have Cousins posters on my wall and I don’t have a Cousins jersey I sleep in at night. He’s a 2nd tier QB who is currently overpaid.Cousins is like Trotz, some people will never let it go.
As of December 2022 Cousins is 10-40 in his career against winning teams. For context, Dak is 22-25. It’s hard to have a winning record vs good teams but Cousins is all-time bad against good teams.
One could lead to the otherGonna need Sam to do the same then….
One could lead to the other
McLaurin broke out. Dotson could do same?Chicken and egg protocol enabled!
Seriously though….the WR isn’t breaking out without a good QB performance to get it to him.
For me really depends on the O-line play.Is it just me or is dotson about to have a breakout year