New IIHF world ranking 2022

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Finland lost one period in that tournament.
Sweden only lost to Canada in round robin. Its playoffs that matters, not round robin. You finns should know that. Sweden beat Canada in final, the same Canada that kicked out Finland. In semifinals Sweden beat Russia. Cant say Sweden did not deserve that gold.
 
Sweden only lost to Canada in round robin. Its playoffs that matters, not round robin. You finns should know that. Sweden beat Canada in final, the same Canada that kicked out Finland. In semifinals Sweden beat Russia. Cant say Sweden did not deserve that gold.
It was a great generation for Finland but yet without winning culture. Later that spring they lost to Canada in the World championship final in penalty shootout. Next year was time for gold. They had for example line Saku Koivu-Ville Peltonen-Jere Lehtinen young boys back then. Also young players like Janne Niinimaa and veterans like Raimo Helminen, Timo Jutila and Janne Ojanen. Best players playing in Europe before the young guys went to NHL. Teemu Selänne was on fire in NHL, Finland won u18 European championship, Liiga was the best league in Europe and Aki Berg was the highest Finnish draft pick yet.
 
It was a great generation for Finland but yet without winning culture. Later that spring they lost to Canada in the World championship final in penalty shootout. Next year was time for gold. They had for example line Saku Koivu-Ville Peltonen-Jere Lehtinen young boys back then. Also young players like Janne Niinimaa and veterans like Raimo Helminen, Timo Jutila and Janne Ojanen. Best players playing in Europe before the young guys went to NHL. Teemu Selänne was on fire in NHL, Finland won u18 European championship, Liiga was the best league in Europe and Aki Berg was the highest Finnish draft pick yet.

It was a coin toss beetween SM-Liiga, Czechia league, Elitserien and Russian league.
 
It was a coin toss beetween SM-Liiga, Czechia league, Elitserien and Russian league.
That is what they used to say in Finland that SM-liiga is the second best league in the World. Those days are long gone. Finnish teams did won the European cup from 1993 to 1995 and EHL 1997.
 
Last edited:
I understand these rankings are only for IIHF seeding purposes. I don't think there is any question that Canada and the USA are 1 - 2 in hockey rankings
 
I understand these rankings are only for IIHF seeding purposes. I don't think there is any question that Canada and the USA are 1 - 2 in hockey rankings

There is no way USA is 2nd hockey country in the world. Start talking when you win IIHF WC.
 
There is a good chance of seeing the conflict resolve within a year - even more within 2 years.

The question of reinstatement does indeed arise.

The most obvious choice would be to return Russia and Belarus to Division 1A with an 8-team tournament.

Playing them in the last division makes no sense. Russia will win 50 to 0 all their matches.

Moreover, the hockey community cannot do without Russia. There are already not many teams capable of playing for the title... The presence of Belarus also makes it possible to intensify the race for 1/4.

Long live the end of the war. Hockey needs these 2 nations.
 
There is no way USA is 2nd hockey country in the world. Start talking when you win IIHF WC.
That will almost certainly never happen, given that:

(1) In general, American players and fans don't care about the WC in the slightest. Unfortunate, perhaps, but true.
(2) (1) won't change while the WC is held during the first 2 rounds of the NHL playoffs.

Rather than paying any attention whatsoever to the somewhat arbitrary IIHF rankings, imagine how Las Vegas sports books would rank the participating nations in a fictional best-on-best tournament occurring this summer.

Reality check - Do you really believe the USA would not be, at worst, #2? Do you really believe Finland would be #1 over #2 Canada?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Czechboy
What justification is there for USA to be ranked second in the world?

The USA has over 200 more NHL players as of this most recent season than the 3rd highest total.

Granted, more "marginal" players will stay at home, compared to the U.S. where the NHL is their "home" league, but when the numbers are that overwhelming and we already know all the best Euro guys DO come over, it's pretty clear. The U.S. does well at the U-20 WJC on a year-to-year basis, which is a better basis than the IIHF World Championships because it represents the best junior players of each year (those immediately prior to professional, the effect of U-20 NHLers is negligible and doesn't harm one country more than the rest).

There is a good chance of seeing the conflict resolve within a year - even more within 2 years.

The question of reinstatement does indeed arise.

The most obvious choice would be to return Russia and Belarus to Division 1A with an 8-team tournament.

Playing them in the last division makes no sense. Russia will win 50 to 0 all their matches.

Moreover, the hockey community cannot do without Russia. There are already not many teams capable of playing for the title... The presence of Belarus also makes it possible to intensify the race for 1/4.

Long live the end of the war. Hockey needs these 2 nations.
There is no justification to have Russia anywhere but the top division, even in bad years, they are never worse than the 5th best. Don't care as much about Belarus but they are usually top-15 ish.
 
What justification is there for USA to be ranked second in the world?
The USA can ice a team that will beat any other with the exception of Team Canada in a legitimate series.

There is no way USA is 2nd hockey country in the world. Start talking when you win IIHF WC.
The WC only shows that the team that wins the most games is likely the best in that tournament.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SanDogBrewin
The most obvious choice would be to return Russia and Belarus to Division 1A with an 8-team tournament.
There’s absolutely no way Russia would agree to get relegated and start in a lower division. It’s more likely they will accept a permanent ban from the IIHF or leave it forever. It will hurt, but it’s the right thing to do - you can’t punish a hockey federation and relegate it because of the actions of the politicians.

The only way this is going to work is Russia returns to the elite division, no additional penalties
 
In all fairness World Championships are not much of a measure given what kind of teams US sends to the tournament.
Well it is not the problem of the rest of the world, if the us doesnt feel like icing a better team. They definitely have the players for it. This is like a kid saying well i didnt give it all in the game, thats why i lost.

All the elite Countries have some of the Best players unavailable. Obviously USA has a much bigger pool of players than the european teams. There are more than enough players available to ice a medal contender every year. Just like the canadiens do. If you dont have the interest from sides of players or US Hockey, thats not anyones problem except theirs. If they want to change that they need to change their aproach to this tournaments.

But anyways like mentioned several times before this ranking has not too much of a meaning, except for seedings in IIHF tournament, depending on the performances in the last Tournaments....

Obviously US Hockey is in a great state. They have an amazing development programm and great players. And they are contenders for any Best on Best Tournament.
 
I understand these rankings are only for IIHF seeding purposes. I don't think there is any question that Canada and the USA are 1 - 2 in hockey rankings
Canada yes, they are the undisputed nr1 nation when it comes to hockey but USA as the undisputed second best? Nah, man there is like 3 other countries that belong to that debate with them.

If we go by the pure player material, top players and depth then I think Russia is the 2nd strongest hockey nation just behind Canada. After that it’s USA, Sweden and then Finland.

Now I know these IIHF tournaments don’t matter that much to North Americans I still think that the results have to matter somewhat, it shows the consistency, depth and resiliance of a hockey nation. It shows how well can you play when you don’t have your best players and how well can a team play with their B, C, D or even lesser teams.

Best on best matters more but we haven’t got one in almost a decade now.

Now if we have the discussion on what country is the second best based on all things considered: best on best, NHL and IIHF success then it’s much more of a debate really, USA belongs to that conversation but is no means the automatic choice. And Finlands stock rises much higher but not quite to that 2nd best position… at least not yet. ;)
 
Last World cup USA was 7th and Finland 8th. You have to take into account coaching, how well they play together and such things.
 
NHL rosters is the answer... I don't agree but that is the answer. That and U18 results.
And 5 posts later and there is your NHL roster and U18 answer (note it was U20 referenced not U18 so I was off by 2 years).

Also that 1996 World Cup Victory carries a lot of weight apparantly. Czechs have won a bigger tournament more recently (Nagano) so I guess I should start pointing out we are the 2nd best in the world too.lol
Canada yes, they are the undisputed nr1 nation when it comes to hockey but USA as the undisputed second best? Nah, man there is like 3 other countries that belong to that debate with them.

If we go by the pure player material, top players and depth then I think Russia is the 2nd strongest hockey nation just behind Canada. After that it’s USA, Sweden and then Finland.

Now I know these IIHF tournaments don’t matter that much to North Americans I still think that the results have to matter somewhat, it shows the consistency, depth and resiliance of a hockey nation. It shows how well can you play when you don’t have your best players and how well can a team play with their B, C, D or even lesser teams.

Best on best matters more but we haven’t got one in almost a decade now.

Now if we have the discussion on what country is the second best based on all things considered: best on best, NHL and IIHF success then it’s much more of a debate really, USA belongs to that conversation but is no means the automatic choice. And Finlands stock rises much higher but not quite to that 2nd best position… at least not yet. ;)
It's amazing to me that people see big gaps between the teams. I've never changed my answer.. it's tiered. Canada is on a slightly higher tier.. then the next 4 are all equivalent with each have different strengths and weaknesses. Any one of the Big 5 could win a best on best and I wouldn't even flinch or consider it an 'upset'.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad