"The Leafs aren’t done shopping yet.
As of late Saturday night, they were showing interest in forward Max Domi. The son of long-time Leaf Tie Domi is coming off a solid season with 20 goals and 56 points but had seen the market shift away from him.
They were also among the teams engaging with Tyler Bertuzzi, although sources felt he was most likely to land somewhere else."
Bertuzzi almost certainly will sign with an American team IMO.
Well first off I don't expect Murray to stick around, not sure if they can clear his full contract but I'd expect a portion of it gone in some way. Leafs currently have 6M of cap space with Muzzin's LTIR contract.
CAP SPACE WITH LTIR CANDIDATES
: $6,068,550![]()
If the Leafs were in on Bertuzzi, they probably have a good idea to be able to fit him in and then re-sign Samsonov as well, which I suspect will be around 3M or so.
It doesn't sound like Bertuzzi will be signing with the Leafs anymore though so it's all moot.
For the record, a 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, and 6th were acquired for those years by somebody other than Lou. He was also able to pick up a 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 4th in those years specifically because we were tanking the prior year. So it's not exactly the picture you're trying to paint. You pick up a lot of draft picks when you're in a rebuild and tanking.This is Lou Lam draining the prospect pool making 18 selections which is 4 more then the standard 14 (7rounds X 2 drafts)
I like the fact it looks like having a bit of flexibility cap wise for later in the season seems to be on the cards. We are not just spending every single last cent. Pridham probably appreciates that too.Can’t believe how badly Dubas f***ed this team. Just completely mortgaged the future and left. Signed boat anchors like Mrazek and Murray - one after the other.
No clue how fans still revere that guy. He f***ed us.
Can’t even afford Bertuzzi and Domi. Have to pick one and look in the bargain bin on D.
Hear me out on this.....how about the framework of a deal centered around Matt Murray for Conor Garland? Vancouver has been actively shopping him and the 3 years left on his deal and couldn't give it away. That gets the Canucks a veteran backup to Demko, and the Leafs some scoring depth since they spent $8 million on 3 bottom of the lineup players totaling 22 G. The Leafs gamble on Garland's upside.
There's a logic to it. But I don't like that Garland has three years of term left.
I think I'd rather just try and dump Murray, even if it costs something, and use the capspace in free agency
Its said that Treliving in very active and "in on everything" but I take that more as being very proactive on the phone and doing more research then real contract interest. I agree with that process on making lots of calls to make sure you don't miss out on things and also help you judge your own offers based on market prices. Trevling calling the Bertuzzi agent to guage is perhaps as far as that went.
But I was speaking more in terms of Cap hit $ and term and that goes beyond just LTIR for Muzz for 1 year or trading Murray a 1 year contract relief all for next year only.
Leafs have to re-sign Matthews, Nylander and Marner still with $$ unknown so anything you would sign a player like Bertuzzi to today on term also has to be considered in 2024-25 (when AM and WN are due) and 2025-26 (Marner). So much uncertainty involved in their future contracts that must be budgeted for TODAY and beyond.
Besides with Bertuzzi holding out that would suggest either he isn't getting his ask and waiting, or he has multiple offers based on interest and his price is going up and he going to get a rich contract. For it to fit the Leafs it be better to simply offer him a 1 year deal at $6.5 mil then consider something like 5 X $5.5 mil all things considered.
Does Leaf Nation really want Treliving to try and outbid others and bring him in with both high cost and term?
As far as I concerned If Leafs were going to blow their own Cap Hell sky high, then it would have been better served offering ROR more money (4 X $4.5 mil) to stay outbidding Nashville instead of offering even more than that to secure Bertuzzi..
so, so far we've lost 76 goals of our roster and replaced it 15 so far.... thats 61 goals short. Even if u wanna pencil in Knies and Robertson for around 30 (maybe that's modest) that still leaves us 31 goals short from last year. There's gotta be more moves to make yet, can't see the Tam rolling out with the forward core they got right now.
Nylander aint coming back, so thats a startView attachment 725294
How could the Leafs possibly make this work cap wise without a large contract going out?
I would probably prefer Garland over paying Bertuzzi what he wants, but yeah... We kind of need a center version of Garland if we were going to do something like that.
Or we need to move Jarnkrok too.
Boston a fellow Atlantic rival that traded assets for him are walking away over price and term. He would know for sure $$ and term.Bertuzzi has a lot more upside to his game than ROR. He showed how good he can be as a complimentary skilled player. He's fearless and he's really good around the net. The one red flag with Bertuzzi is staying healthy.
The problem is that I don't see how he takes less than Killorn took with Anaheim (4x6.25M) so that's probably the issue with being able to sign Bertuzzi.
How many people had the Florida defence rated as Stanley Cup worthy?
Rielly +View attachment 725294
How could the Leafs possibly make this work cap wise without a large contract going out?
There's zero chance Muzzin is coming back - so it's safe to presume that LTIR money is freed up. If Samsonov signs in the range that I think he will (about 3 mil), the Leafs have about 3 mil to spend on a forward if they get rid of Murray they obviously have more.
I'm curious what Treliving plans to do with Lily/Timmins. Seems like one could potentially be sent out in a trade
I don't have a ton of interest in Burtuzzi either. I'd be curious just how cheap someone like Domi could be had
View attachment 725294
How could the Leafs possibly make this work cap wise without a large contract going out?
Rielly +
Sharks gets a 1D who can be a young vet for their team as they rebuild, Leafs get Rielly on steroids. And at $7 million they can even retain on Rielly and trade him for a haul.
I'm at least open to this idea now considering the need that obviously exists for scoring/forward help. I'd likely still prefer to first explore other options that add a F and subtract Murray while not adding to the cap if possible though.Hear me out on this.....how about the framework of a deal centered around Matt Murray for Conor Garland? Vancouver has been actively shopping him and the 3 years left on his deal and couldn't give it away. That gets the Canucks a veteran backup to Demko, and the Leafs some scoring depth since they spent $8 million on 3 bottom of the lineup players totaling 22 G. The Leafs gamble on Garland's upside.
Rielly and Klingberg on the same team isn't better if at all LMFAOKarlsson and Klingberg on the same team.
Train wreck waiting to happening...
Karlsson and Klingberg on the same team.
Train wreck waiting to happening...