Yeah he is getting underappreciated a bit here but their style helps
Get the f***en puck out any way you can makesnit a bit easier on the dman
Yeah he is getting underappreciated a bit here but their style helps
Yeah he is getting underappreciated a bit here but their style helps
Get the f***en puck out any way you can makesnit a bit easier on the dman
That is true. Players very rarely "take less", at least by a significant amount. When fans think players "take less" by a significant amount, it's often just them misunderstanding how contract valuations work in the NHL. But that is what was being claimed - that players in Carolina "took less", so Nylander would too. They didn't.Sure, it's not "taking less", I guess I would argue players very rarely "take less" outside the occasional vet at the end of their career.
That's pretty much what every team does. Carolina isn't special.What does happen is teams like the Canes set a valuation on the player and if the player doesn't like it they can either sit or be traded - regardless of what they might be able to justify in their contract demands.
I agree that I don't think Carolina will want to trade Necas, but Carolina would value Nylander, and I don't see any reason that they wouldn't pay what he ends up making (which is probably less than 10 anyway). But we shouldn't be trading Nylander in the first place.The overall point being, I'd be shocked if the Canes valued Nylander at 10 per, so proposals with him signing an extension and bringing back Necas + seem extremely unrealistic to me.
Unless he softens on his $10m+ ask, you absolutely should be trading him. He pretty much holds all the cards now, as do Matthews and Marner.That is true. Players very rarely "take less", at least by a significant amount. When fans think players "take less" by a significant amount, it's often just them misunderstanding how contract valuations work in the NHL. But that is what was being claimed - that players in Carolina "took less", so Nylander would too. They didn't.
That's pretty much what every team does. Carolina isn't special.
I agree that I don't think Carolina will want to trade Necas, but Carolina would value Nylander, and I don't see any reason that they wouldn't pay what he ends up making (which is probably less than 10 anyway). But we shouldn't be trading Nylander in the first place.
Even if the speculated numbers were true, I don't know anybody that starts a negotiation at a number they're unwilling to move off of at all. In an absolute worst case scenario where he's impossible to re-sign, then explore trades, but even keeping Nylander as an own rental would be better than some of the proposals in here.Unless he softens on his $10m+ ask, you absolutely should be trading him.
Agreed. Unfortunately, I don't see either side moving off their number soon. Willie as an own rental is a non-starter for me. Anything less than a round 3 exit and Willie walking for nothing would be an epic failure.Even if the speculated numbers were true, I don't know anybody that starts a negotiation at a number they're unwilling to move off of at all.
In an absolute worst case scenario, if you can get a good return maybe, but even keeping Nylander as an own rental would be better than some of the proposals in here.
Do you truly think Parise is better than Jarnkrok right now?Trade
Jamcrock
Sign
Zach Parise 1.5 mil his scoring has dropped of but stil plays as hard as ever
Ryan Hartman ufa 1.7 mil he would be a great trade target
Obviously, we'd rather re-sign Nylander and keep the asset long-term, or trade him for other assets that can help long-term. But Nylander at under 7m next year in a contending year has value, and that alone isn't something that should be given up for some of the garbage offers being proposed around here. You just end up hurting your team both long-term and short-term. Hopefully, if it does come to a trade, our management team would get some actual value back.Willie as an own rental is a non-starter for me. Anything less than a round 3 exit and Willie walking for nothing would be an epic failure.
Ok, thanks. Good luck, Sheldon.You just have to watch the game
-When rielly on pp, he created thing
-When sandin was on pp, he created thing
-When Timmins was on pp, he created thing
-When gustafsson was on pp, he created thing
When liljegren, giordano or brodie was on pp, they are absolutly nothing who was coming from the D on pp
If your thinking using liljegren should make leafs a better pp, sorry youre just losing all credibility
Nobody in Carolina has "taken less". Even if Friedman's random speculation were true, it's clearly referencing players taking less than their market value, not players making less because they're worse and weren't worth more when they signed.
You just have to watch the game
-When rielly on pp, he created thing
-When sandin was on pp, he created thing
-When Timmins was on pp, he created thing
-When gustafsson was on pp, he created thing
When liljegren, giordano or brodie was on pp, they are absolutly nothing who was coming from the D on pp
If your thinking using liljegren should make leafs a better pp, sorry youre just losing all credibility
Marner got 6 years.I mean these are the last season on their respective ELCs for Aho and Marner:
Aho - 82GP, 30G, 83pts
Marner - 82Gp, 26G, 94pts
Both got 5 years but it took an offer sheet for Aho to get 8.5 vs 10.9 for Marner. You could argue more for Marner but I don't see how you could possibly argue the winger with 11 more points should get 30% more than the defensively responsible centre with more goals.
Don't know I think he offers something different for the playoffs.Do you truly think Parise is better than Jarnkrok right now?
Didnt Aho sign with MTL?Aho - 10.38% as a C... 30 goals, 83 points. Involved in 34% of teams goals
Marner 13.38% as a winger 26 goals, 94 points. Involved in 32% of teams goals.
Matthews 14.64% as a C, 37 goals, 73 points Involved in 25.5% of teams goals.
Objectively... Aho was either substantially underpaid compared to Marner and Matthews, or Marner (in particular) and Matthews were overpaid.
Aho scored 10 more points than Matthews, and had seven less goals in his contract year... but that's a 30% discount, because he's THAT much worse?
I'm sorry.. I can't agree here.
Tell me about watching Liljegren with the Marlies, and their PP? Tell me about how you've watched Liljegren how he progresses, and what you understand about that.
He did... and still ended up getting paid much less than Marner or Matthews, for a prior years performance that wasn't far off either.Didnt Aho sign with MTL?
I wish we could've gotten Slavin...Damn.
Yeah, because our brain dead mgmt team let it get to this point. I am 50/50 on whether AM will pull a Gaudreau and 100% WN will walk if he isnt traded. They all should have been shipped out after Shanny & Co....this is going to get very interesting....Unless he softens on his $10m+ ask, you absolutely should be trading him. He pretty much holds all the cards now, as do Matthews and Marner.
IMO Klingberg replaces Holl. If Brodie is traded, somebody will be brought in to replace him. If that somebody is Pesche will you not be happy ?
I think the Leafs need another defensive forward with a bigger body. He's unexciting but I suggest Tomas Nosek whose price must be dropping the longer he has gone unsigned. His price is probably a little high for a player who has never got over 20 points in a season. But he's a center and great on draws. I'd be willing give him near $1.5M. If Jarnkrok has to go to make this happen, so be it I could live with that.
Aho - 10.38% as a C... 30 goals, 83 points. Involved in 34% of teams goals
Marner 13.38% as a winger 26 goals, 94 points. Involved in 32% of teams goals.
Matthews 14.64% as a C, 37 goals, 73 points Involved in 25.5% of teams goals.
Objectively... Aho was either substantially underpaid compared to Marner and Matthews, or Marner (in particular) and Matthews were overpaid.
Aho scored 10 more points than Matthews, and had seven less goals in his contract year... but that's a 30% discount, because he's THAT much worse?
I'm sorry.. I can't agree here.
Tell me about watching Liljegren with the Marlies, and their PP? Tell me about how you've watched Liljegren how he progresses, and what you understand about that.
If you don’t understand the player, just say so.You talking about AHL... Are you really serious
Did he progress? Yes
Did he progress enough to play in a good top 4 or in a good NHL pp? No he still need a huge step foward for top 4 and i dont think he having the ability to drive a pp in NHL.
Are you hung up on him driving the powerplay? He doesnt have to if he has a forward to do that.. run it off the half wallYou talking about AHL... Are you really serious
Did he progress? Yes
Did he progress enough to play in a good top 4 or in a good NHL pp? No he still need a huge step foward for top 4 and i dont think he having the ability to drive a pp in NHL.