Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 24,450
- 29,602
I can see them wanting him, but they don’t really have the assets to acquire him… unless it’s a 3-way deal.
Larsson, Wright, Sale?
I can see them wanting him, but they don’t really have the assets to acquire him… unless it’s a 3-way deal.
Some fantasy here
3 way deal
Nylander to anyone who ready to pay
Murray pick and prospect from team X to sj
Karlsson in toronto 33% retained
You can trade brodie to clear cap space and you sign Patrick Kane
Jarnkrok-Matthews-Kane
knies-tavares-Marner
McCabe-Karlsson ( who can bring similar thing when karlsson played with Methot)
Rielly-Schenn
You start to have an line up extremely dangerous
RNH and other piece/pieces
They have plenty of assets to make something work .. including current players
Meh
RNH and Ekholm?
Bjorkstrand oleksiak borgen geekie arent intriguing?They don't really have the cap space, nor players i'd want to take on.... And they still want to compete so guys like RNH probably aren't on the table.
Bjorkstrand oleksiak borgen geekie arent intriguing?
Ya he looked good. Bigger man than I thought. Not shy to throw the bodyI’d be shocked if they’d move him at this point. He basically made them playoff competitive. (Ekholm that is.)
They have plenty of assets to make something work .. including current players
Larsson, Wright, Sale?
Lol.. ok good cause whaaa?Ohh we're totally talking about different teams.. I meant the Oilers, not Seattle.
Seattle makes more sense.
Bjorkstrand and borgen intrigue me off the roster contract relevantWho on their roster would the leafs want AND the kraken be willing to move for Nylander?
I mean, sure, but Seattle isn’t likely to trade their #1 defenseman if they want to contend next year.
Bouchard.....love to have him. I didn't include him in the offers because I doubt he is available at all. He's just scratching his potential. It's a non-starter for the oil.Honestly, that just doesn’t interest me at all. Unless the other offers are terrible it’s a no. To me it would start with Bouchard. Bouchard + RNH. Sure.
Bjorkstrand and borgen intrigue me off the roster contract relevant
I also like morgan geekie in the throwin range.. then prospects picks
He's staying. Oil would be crazy... but they have Holland.Bouchard.....love to have him. I didn't include him in the offers because I doubt he is available at all. He's just scratching his potential. It's a non-starter for the oil.
Bouchard.....love to have him. I didn't include him in the offers because I doubt he is available at all. He's just scratching his potential. It's a non-starter for the oil.
I agree. I have always liked Willie. Much more than AM and MM.I don’t disagree, but then Nylander is a very talented guy. You don’t obtain such a player without giving up something of solid value that hurts.
He is a simple strong right-handed centermen that could play on the fourth line and rotate between Holmberg as he gets his reps. Kind of like what acciari was supposed to doBjokstrand is fine, but the no trade clause could be an issue.
Bergen is fine, but I’d prefer to just sign Schenn, and we can’t really use both.
Geekie is not the kind of player we need to add.
He is very overrated right now and the Oilers found a place for him on their power play but it doesn't change the fact that he is kind of an offensive first guy that has questionable marbles on his own side of center. People bitch about Riley now Riley would look like a Matthias Nordstrom if we had BouchardHe's staying. Oil would be crazy... but they have Holland.
I think Gibson ends up in Pittsburgh.Ducks are way under cap with no desire to improve this year, could you see Murray, and LTIR Muzzin for a retained Gibson?
apparently Kyle not a Gibson fan. Maybe if we take him we flip Sammy's RFA rights to Pitt for somethingI think Gibson ends up in Pittsburgh.