it was shoulder to shoulder. it was where the hit was, that people had issue with it, because it was near the stanchion - most media (not just toronto, or boston mind you) thought it was a good hit, just bad location - where i've always said that's what made it gross. i never ever said otherwise to that fact. but I am sorry i will call a spade a spade. if it's gutless to check someone near/into the stanchion(something that i said over and over again that was really gross, and Debrusk should have been taken to task for that) - then it is equally gutless to take your stick and check it into someone's head.I don't care if it's Kadri or Matthews, or McDavid, or the Dali Lama. I'd be consistent on that one. there were many ways to defend that hit, and Kadri chose the illegal option. Two wrongs don't equal a right.
and I will also point out. I have never said, that Kadri was not a bad centre. What I said was - he can't be trusted to keep his cool. And people can make this all about injury prone players and all that other stuff, which is fine, but again. this is my question - if the Leafs are depending Kadri to really maximize line up decisions and pairings, and the Leafs make it to the finals, - and part of any good coach's strategy would be "get under Kadri's skin and get him to snap, even if it means you have to toe the line, go over the line." do you 100 percent trust Kadri not to retaliate? Do you 100 percent believe that he'll bide his time to defend his teammate (should something happen?)
because I do not because he's proven time and again he doesn't learn from these kind of mistakes - not to mention. even if we want to play the game of, "yeah sure now it's finally sinking in that he can't do something like this" it doesn't change the fact that, despite that Kadri is a 2x 30 goal scorer, at 4.5 million - the question.is. one more time is this and i'll post this one too.
Do you believe that Nazem Kadri is going to score 30 goals from the third line with limited chances?
because if not then it doesn't matter that we have a 30 goal scorer at 4.5m, because he's not going to be able to do it on the third line, and he might not get prime powerplay time (not if we're getting a new PP strat, the go too might just be Matthews, Marner, Tavares, Nylander, and Rielly. and ride them for the 2 minutes).
if you do think he is, then do you believe that he's going to stay at 4.5 (or a little bit more) to stay with the Leafs, when it is possible that if he was a 2nd line (or a 1st line centre for another team he'd be able to hit 35-40+?)
so either way - . we either had a 30 goal scorer who won't be able to do it, or we have someone who can, which has great value to this team to make it better in the areas that we are woefully lacking in.
people wanna go people hate Kadri, and I just want to make it quite clear that i don't. but I don't put my 'love of the player." trump the love i have for the team. The team will always come first to me and what it needs to be better. so regardless of the fact that I don't trust Kadri to do the smart thing on the ice if he's angry - i respect what he also brings to the team, and i think it would behoove the team to maximize the asset and move him out to improve.
because the Leafs do not need a 3rd line 30 goal scorer. that's a luxury.