World Cup: National Team threads #2

Corto

Faceless Man
Sep 28, 2005
16,090
1,004
Braavos
I could have just said - look how far Croatia got in tournaments with a squad full of questionable guys and just a couple of elite players.

You could, but you'd be wrong.

In 2018, Dalic played a high-press game while dominating the midfield with Modric-Brozovic-Rakitic.
He wanted to win the ball up the pitch, regain control at the halway line and he could do that, cause the trio upfront was Mandzukic/Rebic/Perisic - all 3 guys were big, fast and tireless.

We also had Lovren and Vida in the backline, who were good defenders, but not exactly world class with the ball.

The team actually stacked. Subasic from Monaco, Lovren in his prime, Vida in his prime (he went for Ukranian money in Kyiv so people didn't see him), Vrsaljko was a top-5 RB in Europe before ruining his career for the sake of that WC run, Modric, Brozovic, Rakitic, Kovacic, Mandzukic, Perisic, etc.
It was no fluke.

In 2022, there was no Mandzukic and no Rebic, and Perisic was now 33.
We were absolutely bereft of pace. No speed, questionable size.
Rakitic was replaced with Kovacic (which is fine), but Mandzukic and Rebic were not replaced with like-for-like.
And we got Gvardiol at the back end (and have Sutalo now, who is going to go for 60m+ in a year from Ajax).
So what Dalic did was change the high press to this tika-taka - sometimes LITERALLY without the aim to move the ball forward. Just keep the ball, slow the pace down. It's boring, but it works.

Point is, as much as Dalic gets hated on by casuals because of the boring playstyle, he adjusted to the players he has at his disposal.

And that's something a national team manager HAS TO DO.
System coaches in national teams very rarely - if ever - find success.
 
Last edited:

Corto

Faceless Man
Sep 28, 2005
16,090
1,004
Braavos
Basically yes. You need a big personnality with some tacs in him, but most of all a strong connection and authority on the players.
Which is why I laugh when people expect a Guardiola type of managing for France. I want someone strong enough to avoid players playing for themselves instead of for the team (like Germany right now).
A NT manager doesn't have the team the full year with him. He needs to pick the right players (not always the best ones BTW) and start the right guys with the right formation with the right tacs.
But he has way less control compared to club management.
I'm far from agreeing with DD on multiple things (Disasi and Pavard on the NT, not working on penalty shootouts, not picking some talented guys because they're unproven except if they play abroad or at OM, etc...). But he ticks most boxes.
DD is pragmatic but the results speak for themselves.
And in 2016, which was an OK team but without the breakthrough elite players that France has had since then - he nearly won the EUROs too.

1 WC win, 1 WC final, 1 EURO final. Won NL too (2nd tier tournament, but players want to win it once they get to the Final Four, do not doubt that).

That's an amazing resume.
And in Qatar, France had serious injuries as well.

I don't rate Disasi for example, etc., but on the whole, DD's done brilliantly for France.
 

Eye of Ra

Grandmaster General of the International boards
Nov 15, 2008
19,021
5,258
Malmö, Sweden
Sweden has to win all remaining games. Today it starts. Our coach stopped with the Isak and Kulu at top with Mattias Svanberg right behind them. Good choice.

Hopefully he keeps going with Isak and Gyökeres upfront. Forsberg and Kulusevki as wingers. Jens Cajuste and Albin Ekdal (soon Hugo Larsson) in the middle.

Ken Sema and Emil Holm as VB and RB. Lindelöf and Isak Hien in the middle.

Robin Olsen given as keeper.

Viktor Claesson and Jesper Karlsson are good subs.

Martin Olsson in the squad ahead of Gabriel Gudmundsson is a big joke. Brunkmeister is the only person in the world who wants Martin Olsson in this team.

We have good quality on our players, just need the right system.
 
Last edited:

Jussi

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
94,951
12,135
Mojo Dojo Casa House
Sweden has to win all remaining games. Today it starts. Our coach stopped with the Isak and Kulu at top with Mattias Svanberg right behind them. Good choice.

Hopefully he keeps going with Isak and Gyökeres upfront. Forsberg and Kulusevki as wingers. Jens Cajuste and Albin Ekdal (soon Hugo Larsson) in the middle.

Ken Sema and Emil Holm as VB and RB. Lindelöf and Isak Hien in the middle.

Robin Olsen given as keeper.

Viktor Claesson and Jesper Karlsson are good subs.

Martin Olsson in the squad ahead of Gabriel Gudmundsson is a big joke. Brunkmeister is the only person in the world who wants Martin Olsson in this team.

We have good quality on our players, just need the right system.
This is the thread for Euro Qualifiers: Euro: - Euro 2024 Qualifying ;)
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
61,488
19,731
w/ Renly's Peach
With regards to Germany, one word keeps springing to mind: “Schönwetterspieler”

That’s always a hindsight thing though. The WM-winners got that same label until Brazil, and that didn’t stop them from adding another star.

There’s a lack of cohesion and confidence, and we’re still dealing with consequences of 4-5 weak age groups in a row. But a lot of the players had the mentality to win a CL not long ago :dunno:


I think the team would benefit from empowering core kids like Wirtz & Musiala to take over the leadership of the team, while augmenting them with vets like Füllkrug & Gundogan.

But ultimately finding the right balance defensively will do way more for their self-belief / resiliency / confidence than anything the new staff does up front.
 
Last edited:

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
61,488
19,731
w/ Renly's Peach
I disagree on Klopp. His system isn't that complex (it's in fact much simpler than what Germany has been trying to play). His success comes from his communicative and motivational ability not from intricate tactics. It's definitely doable for a national team, but in any event that was just one example.

I could have just said - look how far Croatia got in tournaments with a squad full of questionable guys and just a couple of elite players. And if you take offense to that, I could also refer to Germany's 2014 squad - which had plenty of holes that people could have pointed at to explain an early exit if, say, that Algeria match is actually lost. Some of that is luck, but some of it is also down to creating a successful team where guys know what their role is and execute it, where guys go the extra mile and so forth.

But of course such a team is a fragile thing and doesn't last forever. Jogi's downfall was that he continued to operate on assumptions that worked when he had Lahm and Schweinsteiger and prime Hummels/Boateng at the back. And Flick to some extent continued chasing that mirage. That doesn't mean that's the only way Germany could play, it's just the way those guys knew. And when there's a disconnect between what managers say and demand and the reality on the pitch, players eventually stop listening and stop taking instructions seriously. Flick ultimately failed because he couldn't adjust tactics to personnel and as a result the personnel stopped taking him seriously. The new manager's first task is to restore the players' confidence in the team's leadership.

Jogi’s downfall was he got arrogant and complacent. He stopped going to coaching conventions and stopped trying to integrate fresh blood. Instead keeping the same satiated core around for too long and creating this leadership vacuum where the next generation didn’t get to learn the resilience that the WM winners did, because some of those grandpa’s are still around in leadership roles.

That and he was never that tactically clever. If Pep hadn’t shown him what to do with Bayern, we may not have won in Brazil.
 

AstrophysicalJet

Registered User
May 28, 2008
8,298
3,111
Hornbæk
That’s always a hindsight thing though. The WM-winners got that same label until Brazil, and that didn’t stop them from adding another star.

There’s a lack of cohesion and confidence, and we’re still dealing with consequences of 4-5 weak age groups in a row. But a lot of the players had the mentality to win a CL not long ago :dunno:


I think the team would benefit from empowering core kids like Wirtz & Musiala to take over the leadership of the team, while augmenting them with vets like Füllkrug & Gundogan.

But ultimately finding the right balance defensively will do way more for their self-belief / resiliency / confidence than anything the new staff does up front.
It's true that labeling a team or its players based on past performances can be somewhat of a hindsight bias. The example of the WM-winners and Brazil certainly highlights how quickly perceptions can change in football.

I agree with your observation about the lack of cohesion and confidence in the German team, which could indeed be linked to the challenges faced by several weak age groups consecutively. It's crucial to consider the mentality of the players, especially those who have achieved success at the club level, as they can bring that winning mindset to the national team.

Empowering young talents like Wirtz and Musiala to take on leadership roles can be a positive step forward. Their enthusiasm and hunger for success can be infectious and inspire the team. Adding experienced players like Füllkrug and Gundogan can provide the necessary balance between youth and experience.

Furthermore, focusing on defensive stability is a valid point. A strong defense can build self-belief and confidence within the team, as it provides a solid foundation for success.

TLDR; I pretty much agree.
 

gary69

Registered User
Sep 22, 2004
9,614
2,179
Then and there
Well, well...it's just a friendly but Muller puts Germany ahead against France's new CB pairing of Todibo and Saliba after only few minutes. Some nice passing preceding the goal.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad