Penguins fan here who likes the trade for Colombus. It makes it harder to play against them, hes a hard nosed player, to go with the likes of Hartnell, Dubinsky, etc
I like the Winnik trade for Pittsburg too. (Two can play the misspelling game)
Penguins fan here who likes the trade for Colombus. It makes it harder to play against them, hes a hard nosed player, to go with the likes of Hartnell, Dubinsky, etc
CBJ could have insured Horton for everything but his shoulder. They made the choice not to:
http://bluejacketsxtra.dispatch.com...trade-horton-to-maple-leafs-for-clarkson.html
Why no insurance?
Horton arrived with a pre-existing condition -- a chronically separated shoulder -- that could not be covered by insurance, and they knew Horton would miss more than half a season as he rehabilitated following surgery.
The club opted not to buy insurance for the rest of Horton's body and appendages because it would have been impossible for any other illness or injury to cost him half a season. The shoulder had already put him over the threshold.
Then, last summer, when it came time to insure Horton's contract, his back had deteriorated so badly that the Blue Jackets couldn't insure his contract.
Clarkson will return to form and put up 25 goals next year....Toronto fans will look stupid for the 3rd time regarding him.
.... Even if he put up 25 goals he wouldn't be worth his contract. Hes a poor skater, he' had possibly the worst balance in the league, and he isn't able to make plays, oh and he's not very good defensively.
New Jersey fans warned about all his faults right when we signed him and they shined brilliantly in his short tenure here.
I'm happy he's gone and hope he at least makes himself useful in a Columbus jersey.
I'm imagining a Hartnell-Dubinsky-Clarkson line. I'm seeing a very angry Crosby. This bring a smirk to my face.
I'm sure he'd be fine with the ensuing 5-on-3 for a full two minutes.
I'm sure he'd be fine with the ensuing 5-on-3 for a full two minutes.
David Clarkson is a very good hockey player. A lot of ignorant Leaf fans ignore that he was not utilized properly. He was constantly shuffled with different line mates because of other Leaf players getting injured or playing extremely poorly.
Clarkson is a banger with some scoring touch. When used in structured system with good coaching who knows how to maximize his abilities, he is very good. Clarkson also gives 110% every night. He is a great team mate and will not hesitate to drop the gloves to defend any team mate.
Yes it did not work out in Toronto, but I don't fault him. You will see he will be great for your team.
If my goal is to see the best team on the ice? Yes, paying Horton is better than paying Clarkson. Why? He stays on LTIR forever (ala Pronger) and I use the cap space to acquire another player. One worth the cap space used.
Is he overpaid? Absolutely. Most Devils fans were happy with the idea of giving him a modest ~3.5 million a year, there or there abouts, i'd take him back for that price today even after what happened in Toronto. So you're probably paying about ~1.8m over the odds for what he brings, that's not exactly crippling by any means; and for a team that can't really afford to absorb the kind of money owed to Horton when he's likely never going to contribute on the ice again, i think you guys did a really good job of making the best out of a less than stellar situation here.
I don't get the hate on Clarkson, the guy can score goals in a possession oriented system. He played on a line with Lupul and Kadri in Toronto and was expected to score off of the wing on the fast break as opposed to down low and in front of the net in an umbrella system. That's where he should be.
The fact that we have guys like Johansen, Foligno and Dubinsky who know how to slow a game down in the offensive zone can mean big things of Clarkson's goal scoring.
Oh please... No fan base is going to be excited to add his contract. He needs to be over 25 goals to be worth the cash, we'll see if he gets there.