My worry with Brunette is that he puts more stock in speed than he should and it causes him to make some seriously poor decisions.I guess I could almost understand the love affair for the Cole Smiths and Jankowskis or whoever even more than I can the Gurianov thing. At least those other guys bring something different in terms of defense/checking/consistency that NHL coaches may like.
i dont think Bruno is our guy…we need a tortorella type figureIt also bothers me that for a guy he’s allegedly trying to help build confidence that he waves away the assist as a lucky bounce off a stanchion. It for sure was a lucky bounce but Tomasino also makes a solid play to pick up the puck and get it to Josi when he was already heading for a change. That should be an example of how making those little plays can be beneficial but instead Bruno just laughs it off as a purely lucky play.
Some warts in his overall game but his production is definitely thereTomasino has 0.5 PPG with 12:40 ice-time and only 4 PP points.
I get that other aspects in his game might not be there yet, but can we really afford to ignore his offensive talent?
I'd say put him in the top-six, 17-18 minutes a night and some 1PP time. Piss or get off the pot type of stretch before TDL.
Well past time. I get the reticence to break them up but when you’re playing as poorly as we have recently at some point you have to pull the most obvious lever you have. Also if our great vets rely on playing with each other to produce than are they really all that great? We need them to be elevating the young guys play.I think we need to break up the lines.
Reasoning:
Using the warm up lines from last night (yes i know it isnt how things end up 100% during the game)
Forsberg ROR Nyquist
Trenin sissons Guiranov
Novak Glass Evangelista
Smith McCarron Tomasino
Looking at NHL games played
667 - 1042 - 754 (2463)
271 - 588 - 292 (1151)
118 - 169 - 74 (361)
128 - 197 - 147 (472)
Colton sissons has played more regular season NHL games than either of the bottom two lines combined. Maybe consolidating all the long term NHL experience into one line isnt a good idea on such a young/green team. Even if the team isnt "young" by age like smith and McCarron they are green in actual nhl games played having only played about 2 full seasons worth.
We are a really green team. We should probably be spreading what veteran leadership we have. I get they have chemistry and are enjoying putting up numbersWell past time. I get the reticence to break them up but when you’re playing as poorly as we have recently at some point you have to pull the most obvious lever you have. Also if our great vets rely on playing with each other to produce than are they really all that great? We need them to be elevating the young guys play.
That's the part that bothers me. I get players not performing, especially young players, happens. What we shouldn't see is decisions by the coach leading to either bad play or a loss in points.And we have 10 days to stew over everything. Yay. Hopefully, the coaching staff will take a long look at their part in the recent slide.
That's the GMs job to take away the coaches shiney toys.That's the part that bothers me. I get players not performing, especially young players, happens. What we shouldn't see is decisions by the coach leading to either bad play or a loss in points.
Gurianov has no business being in the NHL but I have no doubt he is here cause he is fast and has Brunette drooling over it despite the fact he stinks in every other aspect.
I also have a huge issue with the coaching staff saying certain young players aren't doing the little things when the guys that are getting ice time aren't doing any better on that front and aren't producing too boot. Tomasino may not be perfect in all aspects but at least he is producing something.
Afanasyev should have been in the NHL weeks ago. What happened to earning your opportunity?
McD managed to be on the ice for 3 goals against with 3 different partners which is kindof impressive I guessYeah what I find most frustrating is how bad plays by some gets them banished to the bench or press box while others seem to receive no punishment for poor play. I understand giving some leeway to guys who have proven to be very good at their position like Josi, McDonagh, or O'Reilly but why do Lauzon or Smith rarely receive any punishment for bad play. Evangelista got worked on the first goal so while I may not agree with the approach I can see why he gets benched, but the other goals fell on Lauzon, Novak, Smith, Schenn, and McDonagh and yet they all just kept receiving their normal shifts.
Overall in the long term we have the capacity to make a few lineup changes through trades or add a vet through free agency but end of the day Brunette is going to have to develop our younger players into consistent contributors. I don't think the approach he is taking now is working towards that goal but hopefully Brunette can grow as a coach and figure out better ways to accomplish that. If he can't we're probably in the bottom of the league standings and can get the true tank rebuild some want so I guess that is the silver lining.
Yeah i really dont get it myself. He does some boneheaded stuff occasionally as does all of the dmen but he seems to get his chain yanked harder than the others. His average TOI has been cut back every season as well. He's gone from 19 mins to just under 17 mins a game as our RHD group has gotten weaker and you'd expect him to be taking those next steps to solidify his game. I think theyve come to the conclusion with what they've got with him.Maybe this has been obvious to most, but boy does it feel like the writing is on the wall for Fabbro. I would be surprised if he isn't moved out at the deadline. I don't think they have any intention of bringing him back .
Yeah, when you scratch Barrie for weeks... then Carrier gets hurt... and right off the bat Barrie comes in and plays 23:37 (and stinks) and Fabbro is down to just 11:27 (ok, also stinking-ish)... still... I mean, the player just needs to escape.Maybe this has been obvious to most, but boy does it feel like the writing is on the wall for Fabbro. I would be surprised if he isn't moved out at the deadline. I don't think they have any intention of bringing him back .
Yes, this is exactly when things seemed obvious to me. Barrier walks in after not being good enough to get in and is immediately double his TOI. I know they are trying to jump the PP that's been rough, but it's still seems like an indictment regarding their confidence in Fabbro.Yeah, when you scratch Barrie for weeks... then Carrier gets hurt... and right off the bat Barrie comes in and plays 23:37 (and stinks) and Fabbro is down to just 11:27 (ok, also stinking-ish)... still... I mean, the player just needs to escape.
I have completely given up all hope on the Fabbro front. I simply don't see what the Preds braintrust sees, but at the same time they sure seem to be doing their best to create a self-fulfilling prophecy of some sort with him. I'm down to just letting Fabbro go for his own sake at this point.