Confirmed Signing with Link: [MTL] D Logan Mailloux signs ELC with the Canadiens (3 years, $897.5k AAV)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Careful with the virtue signalling...and hab hating and generalizing much? you could apply these comments to literally every other fanbase on here.
Mailloux isn't a victim by any means, but I'd be curious about the temperature of the outrage if he wasn't a Hab

If he wasn't a Hab, he wouldn't have been drafted at all......which is what he requested in the first place. :dunno:
 
I've read them. Both. More than once. I don't know how I can make this any clearer to you. Offensive photography and image-based sexual abuse is NOT the same crime. THEY ARE DIFFERENT. Logan was convicted of the former; OFFENSIVE PHOTOGRAPHY. If the prosecutor though he'd be able to charge Logan with SA, I'm very sure he would have.
Nope, according to swedish law the sex crime is one sub-category of offensive photography. Sorry I can't find a source on swedish law for you in french fir you.
 
For those who don't have a clue what really happened. This teenager took pic of woman's occiput and send it to his mates. And told them that this chick gave him a bj. And he was stupid enough to put her name on that message.

No he's not rapist or some other monster people would like him to be. Just a stupid idiot who was stupid enough to boast his bj experience to his jealous teammates.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy
Read the comments here. And you want to know why the prison system has so many repeat offenders? What a farce. He made a mistake, he's paid/punished for it. Move on already. THe irony is that the person in the online picture is more notorious now than she would have ever been without the added attention. Who knew?
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingJoffrey
Ah so there are tiers of sex crimes now????

Garbage opinion mate.

Maybe not in terms of what gets you registered as a sex offender, but I would submit that there is a difference between a consensual act* that ends up being shared digitally without consent.......and a gang rape in a hotel room.

* - again, not even sure if this act was consensual, given the age of Mailloux at the time.
 
Maybe not in terms of what gets you registered as a sex offender, but I would submit that there is a difference between a consensual act* that ends up being shared digitally without consent.......and a gang rape in a hotel room.

* - again, not even sure if this act was consensual, given the age of Mailloux at the time.
Shared picture of OCCIPUT. Not p*ssy what some people seem to think. OCCIPUT.
 
Careful with the virtue signalling...and hab hating and generalizing much? you could apply these comments to literally every other fanbase on here.
Mailloux isn't a victim by any means, but I'd be curious about the temperature of the outrage if he wasn't a Hab
I'm sorry my comment about habs fans outraged you. I think the habs fans in this thread could learn a thing or two about toning down their outrage.
 
And you know this how? time machine? You work for the NHL?
Other teams were looking at him outside first round

I know this because, again, he specifically requested not to be drafted. :laugh:

There was a whole thing about it.

Remember?

Here you go:


"Being drafted into the NHL is an honor and a privilege that no one takes lightly," Mailloux said in a statement released on social media. "The NHL draft should be one of the most exciting landmark moments in a player's career, and given the circumstances, I don't feel I have demonstrated strong enough maturity or character to earn that privilege in the 2021 draft. I know it will take time for society to build back the trust I have lost, and that is why I think it is best that I renounce myself from the 2021 NHL draft and ask that no one select me this upcoming weekend."

31 NHL GMs saw that and made the decision to respect Mailloux's wishes. I'm sure there are many who weren't going to draft him even if he hadn't made this very public request.

Marc Bergevin chose to ignore all of that and draft Mailloux anyway.

Is it possible Mailloux could've been drafted in a later round, or even this year instead? Perhaps.

But you can't argue that the Habs only have themselves to blame, for the heat they're getting over this kid.
 
Why is no one bitching about how a 19 year old woman f***ed around with a 17 year old boy?
she was 18 and he was 17 and 8 months. No one is bitching because that part isn't a crime in either country and if people bitched about that, they'd have to bitch about most high school couples in 11th and 12th grades, and first year college couples lmao.

Was wondering this as well.

Between the two of them, she should've been getting exponentially more heat for this.

Probably would've, too, had this played out in Canada or in the US.

Maybe consent laws in Sweden rendered it a moot point. :dunno:
there was about 6 month age gap between the 2, he at 17.75 and her at 18.25 roughly...no one is mentioning it because it is fabricated outrage by those upset that people are critical of the crime Mailloux was convicted of. 18 year olds date 17 year olds all the time, very weird phony outrage you're drumming up about the victim in this case.
 
I’d give this kid a chance. Not everyone that commits a crime is a “bad person”. Sometimes you do something so dumb and then later you think “what was I thinking??”. He paid for it already. I hope he does well and remains squeaky clean the rest of his life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy
I know this because, again, he specifically requested not to be drafted. :laugh:

There was a whole thing about it.

Remember?

Here you go:




31 NHL GMs saw that and made the decision to respect Mailloux's wishes. I'm sure there are many who weren't going to draft him even if he hadn't made this very public request.

Marc Bergevin chose to ignore all of that and draft Mailloux anyway.

Is it possible Mailloux could've been drafted in a later round, or even this year instead? Perhaps.

But you can't argue that the Habs only have themselves to blame, for the heat they're getting over this kid.
Meh, those are opinions not facts.
I'm sure a few teams had him on their non draft list, but it's also my opinion he would've been drafted in the early 2nd round and most team had him in their top 45. If I were Bergevin I would've traded down at least.... I wouldn't have picked him in the first, but in the 2nd absolutely. The kid is a talented hockey player.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dennis Reynolds
Meh, those are opinions not facts.
I'm sure a few teams had him on their non draft list, but it's also my opinion he would've been drafted in the early 2nd round and most team had him in their top 45. If I were Bergevin I would've traded down at least.... I wouldn't have picked him in the first, but in the 2nd absolutely. The kid is a talented hockey player.

Fair enough.

I'm sure in time Mailloux can realize the potential that made him a first round pick anyway, even if this scandal follows him throughout his career.

Didn't stop Doug Gilmour, or a long list of other NHLers who've been down this road before. :dunno: :laugh:
 
You clearly havdn't read them then other than one headline and then pulled an interpretation out of your ass. They are both about photographing lntimiate/private moments without consent.

"Image-based sexual abuse includes all forms of creation and / or distribution of private, sexual images without the consent of the person depicted. Examples of such abuse is “revenge porn”, stealth photography, upskirting and threats to distribute private, sexual images. "

Maybe you should just accept being wrong. Montreal just signed a convicted sex offender. It's not against the law to do so, it just represents the values of the organization and its fans that accept it.
Mailloux was not convicted of a sex crime and was not considered a sex offender. His conviction did not fall under Sweden's sexual offence criminal code. This is not an opinion, it's a plain fact. Period.

Please stop repeating false information.
 
Mailloux was not convicted of a sex crime and was not considered a sex offender. His conviction did not fall under Sweden's sexual offence criminal code. This is not an opinion, it's a plain fact. Period.

Please stop repeating false information.
He did though, stop repeating false information.

Some organizations cut sex offenders (Buffalo Bills), some sign them (Montreal Canadiens).
 
Careful with the virtue signalling...and hab hating and generalizing much? you could apply these comments to literally every other fanbase on here.
Mailloux isn't a victim by any means, but I'd be curious about the temperature of the outrage if he wasn't a Hab
People were equally disgusted with a player drafted by Arizona of all teams who did a lesser act so I don’t think you have any leg to stand on when saying there’s only outrage because he’s a Hab
 
  • Wow
Reactions: jfhabs
People were equally disgusted with a player drafted by Arizona of all teams who did a lesser act so I don’t think you have any leg to stand on when saying there’s only outrage because he’s a Hab
A lesser act? are you for real?

Mitchell Miller
Four years ago, Miller admitted in an Ohio juvenile court to bullying Meyer-Crothers, who was tricked into licking a candy push pop that Miller and another boy had wiped in a bathroom urinal. Meyer-Crothers had to be tested for hepatitis, HIV and STDs, but the tests came back negative, according to a police report.

Meyer-Crothers, also 18 and who now lives in Detroit, said Miller had taunted him for years, constantly calling him "brownie" and the "N-word," while repeatedly hitting him while growing up in the Toledo suburb. Other students at their junior high confirmed to police that Miller repeatedly used the "N-word" in referring to Meyer-Crothers.

"Mitchell sent a letter to every NHL team acknowledging what happened and apologizing for his behavior. Mitchell made a huge mistake, but we are providing him with a second chance to prove himself. We hope that he uses his platform moving forward to raise awareness about bullying and to discourage this type of behavior.”

Joni Meyer-Crothers, Isaiah's mother, said the Coyotes never contacted their family.

"What they (Coyotes) are saying is what Mitchell did to him didn't matter," she said. "They owe our son an apology. They are not part of the solution. They are part of the problem and they are adding fuel to Black Lives Matter."

"It was absolutely brutal," she said. "Had he not pled guilty, the video would have been released. It would have been so much worse on Mitchell because of the brutality to our son … He's smashing Isaiah's head against a brick wall."


Logan Mailloux,
Took an non-consensual, non identifiable photo and shared it with teammates, he was charged and asked to pay a fine. He paid the fine, he was asked to apologize, he's apologized (she doesn't accept his apology however). Since then he's taken consent courses, he's worked with Sheldon Kennedy who speaks positively of his experience with logan, he's met with a therapist since the summer last year.

I sincerely hope you don't believe that the Mailloux situation is worse then the Miller situation
 
Last edited:
Having a sex offender on your team must be great for the moral.
Habs and Hockey Canada has some work to do
People like you make me f***ing cringe. Not that facts are important or anything, but it wasn't an issue of lack of consent or anything. It was a boneheaded decision to distribute a brief segment of a recorded consensual sexual activity (I honestly don;t recall if she consented to the recording but not the dissemination of it) between two people who were under the age of majority. He's not a sex offender; he was a kid who unfortunately thought something would be humorous and but wasn't. For that he went through a criminal prosecution and had his worst mistake become national spectacle. For dipshit social justice warriors like Justine Trudeau (yes, the guy who though it was a good idea to go blackface. On at least three different occassions) and apparently you. He's paid his pennance, let the kid move on.
 
One is a crime, the other is not.

One was done at a much older age, one was done barely as a teen.

Yes, a lesser act.
Why dont you read my edit, your wrong, not a crime? One of them actually committed assault and hint hint it wasn't logan

Much older age my god, your actually nuts if you think the mailloux situation was worse
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad