Player Discussion Morgan Rielly

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Defense has never been Rielly's biggest strength, but he wins his minutes 5v5. Rielly has had a positive 5v5 goal differential every year for the past 7 years. He is +79 at 5v5 over that time. This while averaging over 23 minutes a game on our top pairing, and playing all situations. I think that's what he means by #2.

Even this year, he is currently only -3 at 5v5, and even that's because we've had an abnormally low on ice shooting percentage while he's been out there so far, not defense. He has a positive xGF% (51.43%) while averaging the most ice time on the team (21:21) and playing a lot of his minutes with a #7. We're putting up worse defensive results with Benoit, Timmins, and OEL on the ice.

As for that "boat anchor", not only is it not a boat anchor, it was a below market contract.
A contract that no other team will take on without the Leafs eating some of it.

I was sitting right behind net for 1st goal which was a snapper from top of circle .. the tender lost his balance and positioning before da shot as he moved to his right and he ended up going down too low on his feet and got beat over da shoulder .. a top end defender might have been closer to shooter and got his stick on puck for deflection but Rielly at least forced shooter wide .. bottom line team needs a save on that shot .. if tender moves quicker/agile and stands up straight it hits him in shoulder .. this should never be a goal in pro hockey
You’re right. The goalie was bad on that shot but Rielly showed no hustle to get back to get his stick in the way of the shot. What about the third goal. What’s the excuse for Rielly’s ineptness on that one ?
 
I noticed the other day the vast variance in the plus/minus of the top 10 scorers.
Defense -16 -> +17
Forwards -2 -> +7

View attachment 966424
Very interesting. There has to be more to this than the excuse that he is much lower because he's been on the ice for empty net goals or shorthanded goals, particularly when you compare him to our other dmen. Tanev and McCabe are on against the other team's first units and they have a combined +30. They're not lighting it up offensively yet their goal differential when they're on the ice is exceptional. It boils down to the fact that Rielly has not been a very good defenceman this season. There is no justification other than he's got his head up his arse.
 
Very interesting. There has to be more to this than the excuse that he is much lower because he's been on the ice for empty net goals or shorthanded goals, particularly when you compare him to our other dmen. Tanev and McCabe are on against the other team's first units and they have a combined +30. They're not lighting it up offensively yet their goal differential when they're on the ice is exceptional. It boils down to the fact that Rielly has not been a very good defenceman this season. There is no justification other than he's got his head up his arse.

Tanev and McCabe both played with Rielly at various points this year and he turned them into minus players while together they form a pairing that can go up against the league's very best and come out ahead.

Rielly is getting over 60% offensive zone starts at 5v5 and failing in soft minutes.
 
No, they're not. Thankfully, considering some of the misguided venom spewed towards Rielly in this thread.
Justified criticism is hardly venom. Thankfully Leafs management actually wants to win and doesn't have the low expectations some Leafs fans have grown accustomed to. Unfortunately there are fans who care more about individual players than team success.
 
Justified criticism is hardly venom. Thankfully Leafs management actually wants to win and doesn't have the low expectations some Leafs fans have grown accustomed to. Unfortunately there are fans who care more about individual players than team success.
Nobody cares about individual players over team success. Very few of the criticisms thrown around in this thread have been justified. Leafs management does want to win. That's why they're going to keep Rielly.
 




Two game 7s, two seasons lost because of Rielly. He’s a net liability.

It’s no coincidence they dumped the puck into Rielly’s corner there. He has zero compete level. I guess the criticism on this thread Is Justified.

Rielly might be a bottom pairing dman on this team.
If they make the right trade for a RD. McCabe can play LD with Tanev and Rielly might be in the press box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40
Not sure how you think that's been shown. Reilly has been a big part of our defense in our best defensive years. There's also more to hockey than just defense.
As a defender wouldn’t you say you should be able to atleast defend ? There is more to it which he also can’t seem to do if he isn’t playing as a rover
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ports
Nobody cares about individual players over team success. Very few of the criticisms thrown around in this thread have been justified. Leafs management does want to win. That's why they're going to keep Rielly.
If what you say is true that management wants to win. The record of 1 single round win in the last 9 years can only led to the conclusion that they are simply incompetent and the one common denominator is Shanny………he must go.
As far as Reilly when OEL, Tanev and McCabe are plus 13-17 and Reilly is minus 16 that pretty much says he is a serious issue
 
As a defender wouldn’t you say you should be able to atleast defend ? There is more to it which he also can’t seem to do if he isn’t playing as a rover
Reilly can and does defend. He takes on the most minutes on the team, takes on the worst partners on the team, and is putting up better defensive results this year than half our regular defensemen. Now, that's not to say that defending is Rielly's relative strength. It's not. But that's not all defensemen do. They have offensive and transition responsibilities too, and Rielly is quite good at those aspects.
As far as Reilly when OEL, Tanev and McCabe are plus 13-17 and Reilly is minus 16 that pretty much says he is a serious issue
It mainly says that people don't understand how +/- works and they should stop jumping to conclusions based on such a bad stat.
 
Reilly can and does defend. He takes on the most minutes on the team, takes on the worst partners on the team, and is putting up better defensive results this year than half our regular defensemen. Now, that's not to say that defending is Rielly's relative strength. It's not. But that's not all defensemen do. They have offensive and transition responsibilities too, and Rielly is quite good at those aspects.

It mainly says that people don't understand how +/- works and they should stop jumping to conclusions based on such a bad stat.
Everyone understands +/-. It means you are on for either more goals against then for or the reverse.
Taken on a game to game basis it’s not really accurate but take over 50 games and compounded by the fact that the next closest player on the team is around -5, for any position
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ports
A contract that no other team will take on without the Leafs eating some of it.


You’re right. The goalie was bad on that shot but Rielly showed no hustle to get back to get his stick in the way of the shot. What about the third goal. What’s the excuse for Rielly’s ineptness on that one ?
I am not making excuses for Rielly he clearly is da weak link in our defense this year .. I don't think he will last more than 2 years in league with his skating drop off .. he has no defensive skills to fall back on to maintain his spot in league .. my guess we are gonna get stuck and/or buy him out in next 2 years
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ports
Everyone understands +/-. It means you are on for either more goals against then for or the reverse.
Considering that a lot of people around here still think of it as a defensive stat, no, they don't understand it. It also doesn't include every goal, and gets skewed by the situations you play. He's -14 from playing PP and goalie pulled situations, which says very little about him. He's -2 otherwise, for pretty much the complete opposite reason than a bunch of people are claiming.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad