Ports
Registered User
- Dec 7, 2017
- 1,608
- 1,665
A contract that no other team will take on without the Leafs eating some of it.Defense has never been Rielly's biggest strength, but he wins his minutes 5v5. Rielly has had a positive 5v5 goal differential every year for the past 7 years. He is +79 at 5v5 over that time. This while averaging over 23 minutes a game on our top pairing, and playing all situations. I think that's what he means by #2.
Even this year, he is currently only -3 at 5v5, and even that's because we've had an abnormally low on ice shooting percentage while he's been out there so far, not defense. He has a positive xGF% (51.43%) while averaging the most ice time on the team (21:21) and playing a lot of his minutes with a #7. We're putting up worse defensive results with Benoit, Timmins, and OEL on the ice.
As for that "boat anchor", not only is it not a boat anchor, it was a below market contract.
You’re right. The goalie was bad on that shot but Rielly showed no hustle to get back to get his stick in the way of the shot. What about the third goal. What’s the excuse for Rielly’s ineptness on that one ?I was sitting right behind net for 1st goal which was a snapper from top of circle .. the tender lost his balance and positioning before da shot as he moved to his right and he ended up going down too low on his feet and got beat over da shoulder .. a top end defender might have been closer to shooter and got his stick on puck for deflection but Rielly at least forced shooter wide .. bottom line team needs a save on that shot .. if tender moves quicker/agile and stands up straight it hits him in shoulder .. this should never be a goal in pro hockey