North Cole
♧ Lem
- Jan 22, 2017
- 11,841
- 13,523
This would be a good time to set precedence, rile up the tin foil hat people even more.Has that ever happened that an appeal turned into more games?
This would be a good time to set precedence, rile up the tin foil hat people even more.Has that ever happened that an appeal turned into more games?
Lol, a poor judgement call was Rielly deciding to crosscheck a guy in the head. The DoPS finally showing some consistency is what everybody should want, they applied a very consistent standard to Perron and Rielly, there's room for variation, but 4-6 games is what I said going in based on whether Rielly successfully convinces them that his stick riding up was a factor, and it looks like the end result will still fall in that 4-6 rangeNo, I still think he should have gotten a fine. What he did get was 5 games which was a poor judgment call by the DPOS. The appeal is a good thing. No one knows what will happen.
If they televised the appeals the appeals wouldn't happen. Its crazy to me that he skated all that way, crosschecked him in the neck, and has some pretty heavy balls to appeal. But maybe its a union thing? goes for the PDS side too as far as televising, btw, in my humble opinion.I'd like to know what MR's argument is going to be. At its core, Rielly's issue is that Greig's actions hurt his feelings and the only way he knew how to make himself feel better was to cross-check him in the head.
NHL's version of "Im offended"
Perron appealed too, in the end, there isn't much risk to appealing, and you might as well get your monies worth out of union dues...If they televised the appeals the appeals wouldn't happen. Its crazy to me that he skated all that way, crosschecked him in the neck, and has some pretty heavy balls to appeal. But maybe its a union thing? goes for the PDS side too as far as televising, btw, in my humble opinion.
Just curious, what is your reasoning that it should only be a fine?No, I still think he should have gotten a fine. What he did get was 5 games which was a poor judgment call by the DPOS. The appeal is a good thing. No one knows what will happen.
Btw…the second Grieg took the slap shot he knew something was coming when Rielly was skating towards him. Why did he know?
Because he knew he made a decision that every player in the nhl sees as asking for negative attention. Giroux and Norris both made it obvious in the their post games lol
Kunitz...Kunitz....not ringing a bell for that series. Am I forgetting?Kunitz remembers
Not sure, but wouldn't it be something?Has that ever happened that an appeal turned into more games?
There were a series of poor judgment calls starting with Greig, then Rielly and finally the DOPS.Lol, a poor judgement call was Rielly deciding to crosscheck a guy in the head. The DoPS finally showing some consistency is what everybody should want, they applied a very consistent standard to Perron and Rielly, there's room for variation, but 4-6 games is what I said going in based on whether Rielly successfully convinces them that his stick riding up was a factor, and it looks like the end result will still fall in that 4-6 range
It should. Such a bad judgment he made as he chose to appeal.Can appealing make the suspension longer? Cause I feel like that’s more likely than shortening it
His/her full reasoning is that the assailant was a Maple Leafs player, and the poster happens to be a fan of that team.Just curious, what is your reasoning that it should only be a fine?
The DoPS made a call to deter dangerous shots to the head, and followed the recent precedent they'd set on a similar incident. You'd think that would be something everyone could get behind, but here we are...There were a series of poor judgment calls starting with Greig, then Rielly and finally the DOPS.
Can't just violate the CBA. There will be repercussions from this.Who cares if it was leaked earlier.
It's part of the CBAAnother thing to be overly emotional about.
Yes! Make it like a coach's challenge. If you challenge and fail you get an extra game suspension tacked on for wasting their time reviewing it lolHas that ever happened that an appeal turned into more games?
Yeah, there shouldn't be head-shots everyone is behind that. A fine would have been and excellent deterrent. why can't we get behind that? A Kangaroo court as Allen Walsh called it.The DoPS made a call to deter dangerous shots to the head, and followed the recent precedent they'd set on a similar incident. You'd think that would be something everyone could get behind, but here we are...
Did I say Grieg should expect a cross check to the face? You’re just trying to stir shit.This makes no sense... are you implying that the crosscheck to the face should have been expected?
I mean a kid that breaks curfew would expect to be punished. But the expectation is getting grounded, not taken out back and being flogged. The latter would be an extreme over-reaction. Much like Reilly's crosscheck.
The severity of the hit.Just curious, what is your reasoning that it should only be a fine?
4 playoff games, not quite the same thing.Mark Scheifele got 4 games; I was expecting the same for Rielly.
they should see his call and raise him by another 5 games. WTF does he think he is??? Do the crime..do the time!Has that ever happened that an appeal turned into more games?
Yeah, there shouldn't be head-shots everyone is behind that. A fine would have been and excellent deterrent. why can't we get behind that? A Kangaroo court as Allen Walsh called it.