Morgan Rielly cross check to the head of Ridley Greig (DOPS UPDATE: In Person Hearing - 6 games or more possible)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
At the end of the day, what Greig did was 100% legal, not dangerous, and within the rules. What Reilly did was not legal, incredibly dangerous and well outside the rules. How is this even an argument?
Well if by "legal" you mean there is nothing in the rule book against it, there is.
 
My only criticism of the play is that Rielly should have hit him harder.

When a no-talent scrub like Ridly Greig - - who’s just as useless as his father was - - is showboating and trying to send a message, there has to be a return message sent.
There sure was. The return message was "I'm really rattled right now." Not sure why you want that as a player.
 
This is 1 of those things that is bad, I think sucker headshots are brutal, but I think it lights a fire in the Leafs and they will be better because of it.
Also the battle of Ontario has some heat in it again and thats a win for everyone
It wasn’t even that bad of a head shot, but when you do that, you should be prepared to fight your way back to the bench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dirtydanglez
Rielly was just demonstrating an analogy. In this case, Greig represented the Leafs and Reilly’s stick the NHL playoffs.
Jets edge out Penguins, nice goal by Rust but no pushback whatsoever for the rest of the game

Onto the next
 
its one thing to clean up players poking at the goalie after the whistle but going after someone after this was just nuts and shows he should have no business in the game. and after doing that shit he ran to the lockers instead of taking a beating he deserved. im neither a toronto or ottawa fan and doesnt really matter what teams would have played that is just rat shit.
 
The Pens suck. What do they have to do with this topic?
I don’t roam the Penguins boards, so the times I see you on main boards, I take it as a chance to converse with you.

As for the incident , I love it , I wish no injuries - and Rielly’s play was dirty, but lots of emotion this year in the NHL
 
  • Like
Reactions: SomeDude
I am so curious to see how this is handled.

I think Perron is the clearest reference. A “clean” player seeking retribution against a player who had not actually broken anything in the rule book. The “code” should not factor at all into any incident where a player targets another player’s head with their stick well after the hockey play is over.

If the NHL really wants to throw the book at Reilly—the other hit that I think could be a reference is Scheifele’s hit on Evan’s from the Covid playoffs. That was retribution for an empty net goal too. That got four playoff games (equivalent to 11-12 regular season games if you use the 28:82 game conversion). Scheifele had never been suspended before either.
Even if you accept that there is an unwritten no slapshots into en rule, it doesn't really differentiate the play from Perron. Perron thought Zub had injured his star player, there is an unwritten rule that if you Ruff up a star player there will be retaliation, so both scenarios fall into the 'justify' some sort of response due to the code.

Reilly might be able to convince the Dops that his stick rode up, and I think he maybe put less force behind it, but otherwise the situations are pretty similar, I don't believe either had been suspended prior, both where after the play with enough time passing that it was just an immediate reaction, both seemed to target the head with a cross check, both were retaliatory.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad