- May 3, 2016
- 9,160
- 5,568
its going to be 4 or 5 for sure, but worth it IMOid be disappointed if its more than a max fine.
the attitude and impact on the room is worth the suspension IMO
its going to be 4 or 5 for sure, but worth it IMOid be disappointed if its more than a max fine.
Well if by "legal" you mean there is nothing in the rule book against it, there is.At the end of the day, what Greig did was 100% legal, not dangerous, and within the rules. What Reilly did was not legal, incredibly dangerous and well outside the rules. How is this even an argument?
There sure was. The return message was "I'm really rattled right now." Not sure why you want that as a player.My only criticism of the play is that Rielly should have hit him harder.
When a no-talent scrub like Ridly Greig - - who’s just as useless as his father was - - is showboating and trying to send a message, there has to be a return message sent.
Nice to see a player sticking up for his no goalie.
It wasn’t even that bad of a head shot, but when you do that, you should be prepared to fight your way back to the bench.This is 1 of those things that is bad, I think sucker headshots are brutal, but I think it lights a fire in the Leafs and they will be better because of it.
Also the battle of Ontario has some heat in it again and thats a win for everyone
Jets edge out Penguins, nice goal by Rust but no pushback whatsoever for the rest of the gameRielly was just demonstrating an analogy. In this case, Greig represented the Leafs and Reilly’s stick the NHL playoffs.
The Pens suck. What do they have to do with this topic?Jets edge out Penguins, nice goal by Rust but no pushback whatsoever for the rest of the game
Onto the next
One rule being violated for sure with this incident, is "I before E except after C"
It really isn’t. The only people who are upset about this are emotionally unstable people who probably go mental when someone calls their mom fat.I don't understand why the slapper was such a big deal
I don't understand why the slapper was such a big deal
The Pens suck. What do they have to do with this topic?
greig and grieg too. that one got me.As long time Leaf fan, I still dont know how to spell his name that I’ve just resorted to writing “Morgs” instead.
You're playing mental gymnasticsThen Reilly should have dropped the gloves instead of crosschecking him in the head.
That or don't let them score.
I don’t roam the Penguins boards, so the times I see you on main boards, I take it as a chance to converse with you.The Pens suck. What do they have to do with this topic?
New to hockey? I'd take ten Darcy Tuckers.There sure was. The return message was "I'm really rattled right now." Not sure why you want that as a player.
Even if you accept that there is an unwritten no slapshots into en rule, it doesn't really differentiate the play from Perron. Perron thought Zub had injured his star player, there is an unwritten rule that if you Ruff up a star player there will be retaliation, so both scenarios fall into the 'justify' some sort of response due to the code.I am so curious to see how this is handled.
I think Perron is the clearest reference. A “clean” player seeking retribution against a player who had not actually broken anything in the rule book. The “code” should not factor at all into any incident where a player targets another player’s head with their stick well after the hockey play is over.
If the NHL really wants to throw the book at Reilly—the other hit that I think could be a reference is Scheifele’s hit on Evan’s from the Covid playoffs. That was retribution for an empty net goal too. That got four playoff games (equivalent to 11-12 regular season games if you use the 28:82 game conversion). Scheifele had never been suspended before either.
I have a complicated opinion on this play:
- I don't mind Greig slapping it into the net.
- I think Rielly deserves a suspension.
- I don't mind Rielly doing what he did.
- I think we need to re-look at our "i-before-e" rules.
New to hockey? I'd take ten Darcy Tuckers.