Rielly didn't cross check anyone either, I watched the game!I watched the game. Your posts are fantasy. Noted goon DeBrusk caused that much havoc only in your brain.
Rielly didn't cross check anyone either, I watched the game!I watched the game. Your posts are fantasy. Noted goon DeBrusk caused that much havoc only in your brain.
You gotta admit, the vigilance and dedication to revising the history of their expectations, what they thought, and when is admirable. The condescension to fans of other teams that are as dumb as them is the cherry on top.That is a gross mischaracterization of every summer since 2021.
For some strange reason this feels like karma in the making.Leafs may be the most mentally fragile team in NHL history.
It's the regular season...mehI guess you could say Reilly FAFO.
Hes now going to miss 5+ games as his teams best D man.
Ahh ok thanks, if we’re getting into semantics, then the NHL uses “might” not “could” in their wording.From my understanding, an in-person hearing is mandated if the player called to the hearing COULD end up with 6 games or more. But 6 isn't the minimum.
It's a bullshit excuse for a blatant cheap shot. No more, no less.Usually code things are related to violence or where someone can get hurt.
Such as:
-dont take a run at our star player
-dont take a run at a rookie
-dont hit the goalie
-a fighter shouldn't fight a non fighter
They are all things where someone could get hurt and a defensive/protective response is warranted.
What we have here is an ego thing where no one has a chance of being harmed.
This is a case where the code would be to take his number and hit him extra hard every chance you get next time you play him, withing the bounds of the rules.
The code doesnt say anything about cross checking a player in the head after he harmed no one.
It's a feelings getting hurt thing. You take their number down and remember it for next time.
you guys are in a playoff battle though...?It's the regular season...meh
From their perspective you don't take a slapshot into an empty net. You tap it in and don't show up the other team.80 pages and not one person has given a real actual logical reason.
It's actually quite funny.
You'll get a question or chirp in return. Not an actual logical answer.
The modern NHL treads lightly over all kinds of bad hits.It will be a full force suspension. No one is going to look over a premeditated cross check to the head. The NHL is not going to have any leniency for this one. Regardless if it their heralded Maple Leafs.
I figure 6-10 games.
There is not even a chance the Leafs management brings up "but he slapped the puck into an empty net" in the hearing. That would be farcical.
This was a bad hit. Not what the modern NHL is going to tread lightly over.
In fact, Keefe will be given a talking to as well.
Need about 15 Darcy Tuckers on this teamNew to hockey? I'd take ten Darcy Tuckers.
I'm not sure what benefit of the doubt your looking for on the bunting hit, it was a direct shoulder to the head of an unsuspecting player that was intelligible to be hit, and not a case where you could argue it was a hockey play gone wrong, right there there is pretty strong precedence for a multi game suspension, add in that there was an injury on the play and you get what you get. Maybe you could argue it should have been two games instead of three? Or Gallagher should have gotten 6? I see those as pretty comparable tbh. Neither guy had been suspended prior but both play with an edge.I'm saying Leafs do not get benefit of the doubt. We even recently saw Gallagher purposely chicken wing Pelech head and only receive 5 games.
6 or 7 games, that's fine. I really doubt it will be more than that. Come on now.
If it was that way, it would mean the suspension length is already pre-determined and the whole process is, thus useless.
It may well be, but let's not presume it'S the case.
They don't have the talking heads on their side ruining the broadcasts. What we saw on Sportsnet and TSN last night was shameful.Everyone is in here crapping on Toronto fans, and I get it, but why is it always lost on everyone in these sorts of threads that EVERY SINGLE fanbase here acts in EXACTLY the same way 100% of the time when a player on their team finds themselves in a similar situation as Rielly has?
Yes, if you take a slap shot on an empty net from 5 feet away this is what happensReally? getting a blindside cheapshot in the head for scoring a goal? I don't care how he scores nobody deserves a deadplay vicious hit. Rielly deserves to sit for a while and ponder.
do you remember what it was?
Leafs are in a wildcard fight. Losing Reilly for six games right now could be bad news. Plus every team already tries to drag the Leaf top guys into the ally and it’s not where those guys want to be. MM and AM and WM are going to be dragged into the fight. IMO that’s not good.It's the regular season...meh
He knew what his dumb ass was doing when he took the slap shot, expect retaliation.Terrible take. Nobody deserves a deliberate cross check to the head unless they did something similar.
This false equivalency shit is ridiculous. "The code" lol. As Matthews, Marner and Nylander dance around after each goal. Clearly, they deserve a chop to the teeth from the opposing player right?
They can't. Even actual active/retired professional players can't give good reasons for it.Like people just say “it’s the code”. But like seriously. What is the actual problem with the slapshot? No one can explain that other than “it’s the code”
Under Melnyk? Ya. They were barely even trying even through the Karlsson years. Lets see how a legit operation goes.The Sens expectation was to be a bottom 10 team for 7 years in a row?
"A what what?"you guys are in a playoff battle though...?