Proposal: Montreal Retool

[Techcoockie]

Ehlers motor is worth more than Domi IMO. Both are equally good, but we need to factor in the Motor and dedication of Ehlers in that trade.


What would be the add from Montreal ? Lehkonen ?

 

[mattyboy]

Domi+2nd for Ehlers is fair imo.

 

[Legend123]

Bad for jets

 

[Mister Ed]

What is the value of Max Domi going to Detroit? Starting with the 2020 2nd round pick (58th) and adding.

I think that he would be a great fit at C in Detroit.

 

[Snowman]

No interest at all from Winnipeg.

 

[BuiumSaveUs]

Can’t see Detroit being willing to give up anything that would be worth it for Montreal.

 

[TheImpatientPanther]

What is the value of Max Domi going to Detroit? Starting with the 2020 2nd round pick (58th) and adding.

I think that he would be a great fit at C in Detroit.

MON fans are gonna want a lot more, some have said a pick near 10th or so + a good prospect
I think that's a good amount of dreaming but you always ask/reach for the stars and land/settle on the moon

 

[the paisanos guy]

Mid 1st + 2nd valuewise gets it done I think, otherwise we just resign him and deal with having too many centers.

 

[jgimp]

Zero interest from the Jets. If we are forced to move Ehlers (or other big winger) I would rather target a D Man like Pulock, Ekblad or Pesce

 

[howkie]

No, IF Domi only was able to take the 4 center spot in Montreal, I assume he is not fit to be a nr 2 center in Central. I rather have Ehlers as winger then Domi.

 

[Big Empty]

A Domi trade doesn’t start with the 58th pick.

I’d also rather trade him for an established player.

 

[RC51]

Not interested in ANY trade unless Habs get a massive overpayment that is a clear win for the habs in any trade. I am NOT interested in any trade that is good for you, I am only interested in trades that is good for the habs. Any trade that gets me more then what I want and I give up a cheap unwanted player or pick in fact a total one sided gain for the habs. OK as you see two can play this game. Oh yes one more thing, learning from Donald, make the one sided deal and then DONT PAY, invent a problem and force the other side to take me to court and settle for 1/2 deal. hahahahah. Humm three can play this game hahahah

 

[Hunter368]

Personally I wouldn't do that if I was the Jets. If Chevy wanted to trade a winger to some other team (not specifically the Habs), it wouldn’t be Ehlers IMO. Jack R is ready to step into a top 6 role on RW and put up 40-50 points. I would be trading Laine due to his short term deal and greater value then Ehlers.......Laine trade would fill multi needs on the Jets and allow Jack R to move up into the top 6 where he deserves to be.

 

[blinkman360]

That 2nd seems more like the "add on" vs the "starting point". Domi is a pretty valuable piece. Still have no idea why MTL would want to deal him. Does he want out or something?

 

[teemussalami]

As a DET fan, I would base a trade for Domi around Mantha as the main piece.

 

[Mister Ed]

That 2nd seems more like the "add on" vs the "starting point". Domi is a pretty valuable piece. Still have no idea why MTL would want to deal him. Does he want out or something?

My impression was that the fans said it was time to move on from him. I might have under-estimated his value

What are MTL's needs?

 

[the paisanos guy]

That 2nd seems more like the "add on" vs the "starting point". Domi is a pretty valuable piece. Still have no idea why MTL would want to deal him. Does he want out or something?

We have 2 budding center prospects in Suzuki and KK who look poised to break out after the playoffs they had. Plus Danault, who's a great defensive center and Claude's dream player so unlikely to get traded. That makes Domi the odd guy out if we want to give our prospects quality minutes at C.

He's a good player, but we'd be dealing from a position of strength and it seems like it would be wise asset management to move him.

 

[Techcoockie]

Zero interest from the Jets. If we are forced to move Ehlers (or other big winger) I would rather target a D Man like Pulock, Ekblad or Pesce

you don'T want Ekblad... he's the reason why this team don'T have any leadership IMO

 

[TheImpatientPanther]

you don'T want Ekblad... he's the reason why this team don'T have any leadership IMO

what a crazy post.

 

[Habs Halifax]

Personally I wouldn't do that if I was the Jets. If Chevy wanted to trade a winger to some other team (not specifically the Habs), it wouldn’t be Ehlers IMO. Jack R is ready to step into a top 6 role on RW and put up 40-50 points. I would be trading Laine due to his short term deal and greater value then Ehlers.......Laine trade would fill multi needs on the Jets and allow Jack R to move up into the top 6 where he deserves to be.

Trading Laine won't return a potential #1C if that's what your thinking. He's good but not that good. Habs can offer Caufield, Domi, and our 16th OA pick. We can also talk about including one of our young guys at RD (Fleury is NHL ready and Brook probably needs another AHL season or two).

I doubt any team can offer you a proven top 6 talent like Domi who can play center, and also a top prospect like Caufield and the 16th pick... with additional RD options. You might say it's low or not what you are looking for but Habs can also say we are stretching. Laine is not a complete winger and his career stats so far are 36 goals and 67 pts. You won't get 80+ pts and 50 goals and I feel like Jets fans are setting the value way too high on Laine. Like I said... Laine is good but not that good. If he was that good, your GM would have locked him up and not bridged him.

As far as Ehlers... I like him a lot and I know him back from the Mooseheads days. Jets won't trade Ehlers... I agree with you on that

 

[jgimp]

you don'T want Ekblad... he's the reason why this team don'T have any leadership IMO

Wheeler can straighten him out lol. Some people aren’t leaders. If there is some of that pressure taken off him it would probably let him concentrate on hockey.

 

[blinkman360]

We have 2 budding center prospects in Suzuki and KK who look poised to break out after the playoffs they had. Plus Danault, who's a great defensive center and Claude's dream player so unlikely to get traded. That makes Domi the odd guy out if we want to give our prospects quality minutes at C.

He's a good player, but we'd be dealing from a position of strength and it seems like it would be wise asset management to move him.

Domi seems like the type of guy who could play well from the wing as well if needed. Still I'd rather keep him at center and build 3 quality lines that you can roll out equally. At that point though, if you view him as your 3C, it comes down to how much he asks for. If it's $5M I think you can live with it for a 3C, or technically more of a 2B-center.

I think if you deal him you're just going to end up looking for his type of player again in the near future.

 

[Mister Ed]

That makes Domi the odd guy out if we want to give our prospects quality minutes at C. He's a good player, but we'd be dealing from a position of strength and it seems like it would be wise asset management to move him.

You summed up quite eloquently what I had trouble to put into words. Detroit is limited in C prospects with Veleno needing more time in the AHL and Rasmussen better suite for a 3rd line role IMO.

 

[Habs Halifax]

My impression was that the fans said it was time to move on from him. I might have under-estimated his value

What are MTL's needs?

Proven top 4 LD or a goal scoring winger with size. Lots of fans think we need a young LD but that's not the case. Romanov, Harris, Norlinder, Stuble are very good young LD's with potential. We actually need a goal scoring winger with size the most. Chiarot has been a great signing for us at LD.

 

[TheImpatientPanther]

Wheeler can straighten him out lol. Some people aren’t leaders. If there is some of that pressure taken off him it would probably let him concentrate on hockey.

Ekblad is fine and should have been named Captain instead of Barkov but no, he's not moving anywhere anytime soon. That poster has no clue what they're talking about