60 years old played in the East end of T.O. where I grew up buddy , alive for the last 2 cups and was in the womb for another , how about yourself there keyboard king , XBox much ? You still need to win games to get to games 5, 6, and 7 and somebody has to put up points to get you those wins . It never ceases to amaze me how the swallowers ignore the basic stats and make up these obscure stat scenarios that fit their narrative . Now go cry to the mods and I'll take yet another sussy .
Their farm is stacked. They be drafting high in next two draft. Possible Dickinson and Misa
Lol. You really should have gone with being a hockey watching and playing rookie. It would have been less embarrassing for you.
, that's how you diss someone 1980s' style !
right the question the author tries to answer is whether it's true the many or the majority of JT's goals that year were tap-ins that resulted from Marner's exceptional playmaking ability. It is a response to what the author saw as a too-common argument among haters and losers that JT was an interchangeable or insignificant part in many or most of his goals, because Marner was doing the important skill work. He concludes that most were not tap-ins and even for those that were you must give credit to JT for making himself available in the slot as a target etc.
For those that didn't notice, the bad article that the individual incorrectly paraphrased the conclusion of was from 4 years ago, and the player card (that actually took market value from an outdated and problematic external model) was from over 3 years ago after his worst season of the last half-decade (the season where he had a high ankle sprain). There's a reason that something more recent wasn't chosen.
