The Masters
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2018
- 4,402
- 6,037
That's click bait garbage.
Ya pretty good. I'm going off vague memory but I think he had a few points in Game 7. Wasn't much of a difference maker in the first four games. I could be wrong but I do remember that narrative.The stats say he played in 7 games, scored 4 goals and 2 assists, for 6 total points, with 2 game winning goals, and a plus 3.
During the combine, TSN's Pierre LeBrun caught up with Treliving. Obviously, with the Mitch Marner chatter, LeBrun was keen on getting an update, which Treliving was happy to provide.
Judging by his comments, Marner will not be moved for the sake of moving him. The star winger will need to draw a significant return for the Leafs - one that will improve the team - in order for Treliving to pull the trigger.
Treliving acknowledged Marner's no-movement clause, but re-affirmed that the goal is and always was to make the team better.
Here are the first 2 comments from that link, interesting when juxtaposed with Marner's comment.
The pot calling the kettle black once again, do as I say, not as I do. Hypocrisy World Champion right here folks……Yep, opinions are fine it's the idiocy used by some (most of which have nothing to do with the play on the ice) to arrive at their opinion that's the issue.
I have to look up, 2013 was a long time ago. So he scored the game winners in game 2 and game 6. Mostly what I remember was the feeling in game 7 that any shot on net against James Reimer was going in. I literally didn't think we were going to make it to OT.Ya pretty good. I'm going off vague memory but I think he had a few points in Game 7. Wasn't much of a difference maker in the first four games. I could be wrong but I do remember that narrative.
If I were to guess he had 1 or 2 points in the first 4 games and then maybe 3 in game 7. A game winner and some other points in game 5/6.
Nah it's the same garbage Marner's camp has been spewing out there to the mediaThat's click bait garbage.
Edmonton offers McDavid straight up and marner says no, the answer is no.
I’m hoping this pisses off Leaf management, and they start to play hardball with 16. Conn Smyth used to say “if you can’t beat them in the alley, you won’t beat them on the ice…….”Ha .. this leafs team is such a soap opera
all the constant noise will never end with marner and his agent always negotiating through the media
I have to look up, 2013 was a long time ago. So he scored the game winners in game 2 and game 6. Mostly what I remember was the feeling in game 7 that any shot on net against James Reimer was going in. I literally didn't think we were going to make it to OT.
It will be a media circus year the longer this goes. Unsigned and unmoved.I’m hoping this pisses off Leaf management, and they start to play hardball with 16. Conn Smyth used to say “if you can’t beat them in the alley, you won’t beat them on the ice…….”
they wont do anything. they are too scared of a mgm. groupI’m hoping this pisses off Leaf management, and they start to play hardball with 16. Conn Smyth used to say “if you can’t beat them in the alley, you won’t beat them on the ice…….”
So is frank seravelli the new ekkund sinxe he haa marner on his trade bait board no 1?Why would they shop him if he wants to stay?
They're spilling the news to Leafslatest?Nah it's the same garbage Marner's camp has been spewing out there to the media
Never boring I suppose…….It will be a media circus year the longer this goes. Unsigned and unmoved.
Tavares karma? The Winter Soldier will love it.
Fear on the ice, fear in the boardroom…….they wont do anything. they are too scared of a mgm. group
read the bottom. justin bourne. leafslatest has been quick on media guys speaking re: leafs rumoursThey're spilling the news to Leafslatest?
Yes, I do know. Don't you?Yes, I do know. Don't you know?
Is this the same information that came out yesterday?read the bottom. justin bourne. leafslatest has been quick on media guys speaking re: leafs rumours
no, that was brad to pierreIs this the same information that came out yesterday?