I dont mind taking each playoffs at face value but its exactly because the sample sizes are so small that we have to expand to get a bigger picture.
If you took McDavids first 3 years of his contract and applied faulty playoffs points to dollars mentality to his value then you would end up with a bunch of nonsense.....and the reason he didnt make the playoffs in earlier years, despite being the greatest player on the planet, was because its a team sport. Even now with a far more solid team, things look shaky due to poor depth and goaltending. (Im rooting hard for him though as this chance might not come again).
PPG literally levels the playing field for those great players that have incomplete teams.
Has Necas really been better than Nylander the last 3 years? He has one more point in twice the games. Using this flawed logic, you can already label the Nylander contract maybe the worst in the league no? If the Leafs run another few years of Samsonov/Campbells, Nylander should be declared a complete scrub right?
For starter, I would not look at the past few years in playoffs but rather look at each playoffs(year) individually. As why do you need to lump the past three years or four years or two years? What is the purpose of that? As I said earlier, playoffs is not like the regular season where players played 80 games or so.
Think the most recent playoffs(given it was not 4-5 seasons ago) is a pretty good indicator of the players ability in playoffs.
Secondly, Goals matter more.
Thirdly, our boys are a whole bunch of Betas that thinks they are Alphas, they will always hide behind these advanced stats instead of real stats, such as WINS in playoffs.
Skinner is by far the worst goalie this playoffs and yet he is going to play in the SCF b/c the big guys on the team showed up to play instead of kept learning lessons or being right there.